[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
ok can someone answer this hypothetical for me. I asked a couple of friends and some of them arent even sure so i hope someone can help me out here.
Ok lets say i back someone named Dave in MTTs on pokerstars. for the first two weeks of the backing he is down 10k in make-up. Lets say he plays a 200 freeze on sunday and hits a 34k score. After we split 17k down the middle and after he pays back the 10k in make-up he owes me. I walk away with 27k to his 7k. Now here begins the real question. Lets say he plays the next couple of day and loses 3k more in make-up in MTTs. What would his make-up be ? would it be 3k becuz we start fresh over again or would he have a free 27k worth of make up from me becuz of the score he hits since that money is money he has techically won?
Thanks for your help
Jordan -
Sounds like he owes you 3K.. IM trying to figure out the math to see whos getting the better deal. Im gonna think outloud here.
13K in makeup.. he wins 34.. So thats 21 in profit.. But he only gets 4 total? I dunno.. -
take the 10k back first, chop the 24K and start fresh imo
-
I have no clue bro. Im curious at to this works when one of you ballers back me.. I would think you would split profits fiddy Fiddy no?
-
I'm pretty sure that you should take the 10K in makeup and take that out of the 34K in winnings and then split the remaining 24K and that Dave should get 12K. After that make-up starts fresh and he now owes 3K in make-up. I have never been involved in backing deals but it seems like common sense to me.
-
^^^^DC sounds rigth to me.
-
What calband said. Subtract the makeup then divide the total (minus any stakeback). After that you begin from even. He has $3k in makeup. It's never based on past winnings because he can essentially freeroll his backing after one score, which is BS since it only hurts you. It starts fresh whenever makeup is fully paid so yeah.
-
The best thing to do is to not split up all of the profit immediately after a cash. Keep the entire cash in the stakee's bankroll and allow them to take set draws every month from the bankroll. At the end of the staking deal divy up any additional profits that haven't been drawn off.
6 month stake deal with 20k starting roll, 2k per month draw
First month lose down to 10k, have 10k left.
Draw 2k , roll 8k
Second month win 34k, roll 42k
Draw 2k, roll 40k
Third month lose 6k, roll 34k
Draw 2k, roll 32k
Forth Month win 8k, roll 40k
Draw 2k, roll 38k
Fifth Month lose 2k, roll 36k
Draw 2k, roll 34k
Last Month win 15k, roll 49k
Draw 2k, ending roll 47k
Take back the original 20k, leaves 27k,
If the split is 50/50, then split the 27k into 2, for a total of 13.5k each, deduct the 12k of draws from the stakee's portion and the stakee gets a payment of 1.5k, and the staker would keep the rest. -
That's how I do it but with slight differences. I was staked $3k for 500 max live, and any time the profit was $2k or more, I withdrew $1k and gave $1k back to the staker to reset. Not a weekly draw, and we would just run thing until whenever, and have optional reloads and etc... Really flexible, and it makes sure both of us get max value and flexibility.
-
I say "Dave" gets all profits and don't owe you shit imo.
But then again, I'm biased.
Similar Threads
-
95 Replies
number of people backed online
By heather29360 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Jan 16th, 2008, 09:56 PM -
2 Replies
question for those who are backed
By rimmer27 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Dec 2nd, 2007, 12:21 PM -
10 Replies
Somebody help me with this question about being staked or backed!!!
By brianbeeper in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Apr 20th, 2007, 01:58 PM -
6 Replies
question for backed players...
By bustarimes in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Feb 11th, 2007, 10:13 PM - 0 Replies










