Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Rip off in "OWNS" tourney

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2
  1. feldliss feldliss is offline

    Eagan, MN
    United States

    Posts: 303
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:08am)

    Champking, ProjectSix, and AtticusAA agreed to a 1400, 1350, 1350 chop with ProjectSix getting the 1400. Once Atticus was knocked out Champking negotiated a new deal leaving Atticus out! This is CRAP!!! Remember that when you see them both!!!! feld
    1
  2. raiderman77 raiderman77 is offline

    Posts: 24
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:10am) in reply to feldliss

    Scumbag ownsssss...i cant believe what i just saw....what a bunch of BS that was.....aaticusaa we all saw the scam man...you guys should go jump off a bridge for what you did to him ..oh and then if scamming once wasnt enough..project just called champs all in after agreeing to 2400 and champ won it, then decides it shjould be 2050 each...you should be proud MAAM
  3. feldliss feldliss is offline

    Eagan, MN
    United States

    Posts: 303
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:11am) in reply to raiderman77

    YUP pay up guys!!!!!!!!!
    1
    Thread Starter
  4. mariebadee mariebadee is offline

    Minneapolis, MN
    United States

    Posts: 378
    Joined: Mar 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:13am) in reply to feldliss

    Champking pulled the fast one here. deal was definatley in effect. it was pretty bad. it seemed that projectsix was confused about the whole thing. hope thats the problem. messed up though
  5. feldliss feldliss is offline

    Eagan, MN
    United States

    Posts: 303
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:14am) in reply to mariebadee

    He knew the deal and gave in to greed, that's all it is!!!
    1
    Thread Starter
  6. coloradoking coloradoking is offline

    Posts: 30
    Joined: Mar 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:15am) in reply to feldliss

    I agree that Champking was the asswipe in this deal as he "negotiated" the whole thing but Six has to do the right thing and call him out on that bs. no need for this kind of crap.

    F champking
  7. kinkymoney kinkymoney is offline

    Eugene, OR
    United States

    Posts: 54
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:17am) in reply to mariebadee

    I think P6 was confused..he was also playing heads up on another table but ProjectSix did mention to Champ that he thought they agreed on a 3-way split.
  8. feldliss feldliss is offline

    Eagan, MN
    United States

    Posts: 303
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:18am) in reply to coloradoking

    Nope we all respect and trust each other, and they're ruining it.
    1
    Thread Starter
  9. westtexasman westtexasman is offline

    Lubbock, TX
    United States

    Posts: 785
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:28am) in reply to feldliss

    made me SICK when i seen them 2 make a deal after agreeing to a 3 way chop,sure hope this gets settled ,but my guess it will not,very sick day for chop agreements.
     
  10. ProjectSix ProjectSix is offline

    Toronto
    Canada

    Posts: 664
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:29am) in reply to feldliss

    I made a response to this in the other thread about myself winning an Aruba seat.. please read it there.
     
  11. feldliss feldliss is offline

    Eagan, MN
    United States

    Posts: 303
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:30am) in reply to westtexasman

    Can't you help by contacting UB WTM. Atticus is a new player at UB and just feels sick right about now.
    1
    Thread Starter
  12. westtexasman westtexasman is offline

    Lubbock, TX
    United States

    Posts: 785
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:35am) in reply to feldliss

    Feldless nothing i can do exept email support,i could wake annie or russ up if they are sheeping but ub allows no deals .lets give chipking time to make this right with all involved and if he does not,lets see where to go from here

    Shawn
     
  13. mariebadee mariebadee is offline

    Minneapolis, MN
    United States

    Posts: 378
    Joined: Mar 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:43am) in reply to ProjectSix

    next week is" the Champking OWNS" guy disrepects the best observer tourney out there and it will be named after him. gotta love that.
  14. 1.21Gigawatts 1.21Gigawatts is offline

    NY
    United States

    Posts: 12,935
    Joined: Oct 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:48am) in reply to ProjectSix

    This one is floating all around the internet. I was reading Daniel Negreau's site when I heard about this. You two had better be careful. The people are saying this Atticus guy is a lot like Teddy KGB. Definitely one guy you don't wanna f*ck with. I mean, this isn't Roman and Maurice we're messin' with here.
  15. codewizard codewizard is offline

    Posts: 295
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 1:52am) in reply to feldliss

  16. beanie beanie is offline

    Saint Paul, MN
    United States

    Posts: 6,272
    Joined: Jan 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 2:03am) in reply to codewizard

    I think ultimately what this will do is change the way that tournament works. If ChampKing's intent is to screw these 2, my guess is there is nothing to get at this point.
  17. 2 Guns up 2 Guns up is offline

    Yonkers, NY
    United States

    Posts: 3,632
    Joined: May 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 2:57am) in reply to beanie

    So those 2 were planning it the whole time?
  18. Dumb Walrus Dumb Walrus is offline

    S Lake Tahoe, CA
    United States

    Posts: 16,512
    Joined: Jan 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 3:54am) in reply to 2 Guns up

    I was busy watching J-Bax own in like 400 stars tournaments tonight, so what happened? Is this chit for reals? OMG, Ive never heard of something so shady since NoLimitPro! So is this ChampKing guy NLP under new name or this guy just the most hated player online right now?
  19. ProjectSix ProjectSix is offline

    Toronto
    Canada

    Posts: 664
    Joined: Apr 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 3:55am) in reply to Dumb Walrus

    Certainly the most hated by me.. I wish this whole mess hadn't happened.
     
  20. HelenRNurse HelenRNurse is offline

    United States

    Posts: 4,495
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 7:17am) in reply to ProjectSix

    Beanie? I can think of one possible solution to this problem. Simply have the winning money sent to you for you to distribute according to who wins or whatever chop is agreed upon. Think this would work???

    I saw this happen and honestly thought that project6 was just agreeing with Champking to make sure that he got his cut and that if Project6 won, he intended to chop as originally agreed. Glad you proved me right, Project6.
  21. digitalmonkey digitalmonkey is offline

    Posts: 863
    Joined: Jan 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:09am) in reply to beanie

    This begs the question:

    Why the f does Ultimate Bet not have a chop option like pokerstars?
  22. HelenRNurse HelenRNurse is offline

    United States

    Posts: 4,495
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:19am) in reply to digitalmonkey

    Monkey, can't answer that question, but what do you think of my solution 0f having Beanie distribute the winnings, if he is willing?
  23. digitalmonkey digitalmonkey is offline

    Posts: 863
    Joined: Jan 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:23am) in reply to HelenRNurse

    I am 99 44/100ths% sure that Beanie would not rip anyone off, but I think UB needs a system that is available to any player equally. They need to get on board and create a dealmaking system. Of course, they would probably charge a percentage to organize the deal.
  24. HelenRNurse HelenRNurse is offline

    United States

    Posts: 4,495
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:27am) in reply to digitalmonkey

    True, UB does need a system to allow chops. Do you want to start the petition or shall I?
  25. digitalmonkey digitalmonkey is offline

    Posts: 863
    Joined: Jan 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:33am) in reply to HelenRNurse

    Ladies first....
  26. HelenRNurse HelenRNurse is offline

    United States

    Posts: 4,495
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:34am) in reply to digitalmonkey

    :) TY, Sir
  27. lucky seven lucky seven is offline

    Escaz
    Costa Rica

    Posts: 379
    Joined: Jan 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:36am) in reply to ProjectSix

    Why do you chop with people you dont know in a winner takes all tourney? Champking is not even a good player.

    F champking
  28. Petoria Petoria is offline

    South Bend, IN
    United States

    Posts: 343
    Joined: May 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 9:44am) in reply to feldliss

    I posted this subject on FCP, I just couldnt believe what i was seeing. Champking's main excuse was that AtticusAA did not leave his name, but who cares, you can't tell me that the guy is never going to be online again. I don't hold P6 accountable for this too much, he did want to do the right thing, but Champking wouldn't allow it. I also noticed that they continued to play, and i was thinking exactly what P6 was, "This guy isn't going to transfer the money if he wins". This Champking guy seems very shady, and he is should be excommunicated from the online poker community. Whoever is at a table with him at his next tournament, should crucify him for pulling shit like this in a poker world whose reputation isn't exactly great after a show like Tilt. He's going on my buddy list, buddy in the loosest sense of the term, and I will be berating him whenever he plays next.
  29. TranquilChaos TranquilChaos is offline

    Provo, UT
    United States

    Posts: 1,845
    Joined: Feb 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 11:21am) in reply to Petoria

    correct me if I'm wrong: but shouldnt the "winner" have to transfer the appropiate amounts to the other players...therefore nobody is moving their own money? champking is credited w/ total amount, then he gives the amounts agreed upon to the "losers"? why would the 2nd placd finisher (projectsix) be responsible for 3rd place? makes no sense...sorry im done
     
  30. MrSneaky MrSneaky is offline

    Las Vegas, NV
    United States

    Posts: 308
    Joined: May 05

    May 18th, 2005 (5/18/2005 11:48am) in reply to feldliss

    I wonder if they will send me my $150 too? :)
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2

Similar Threads