Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
As you know Stammdog is a very successful high stakes. I don't really have any history with stammdog. Since I've joined the table I really haven't gotten out of line. I'll take suggestions on the flop too. Is 3 bet/calling good on the flop good here this deep. Folding seems pretty nitty. Notice I have the ace of diamonds so he can't have the nut flush draw. And to the river what's the best line. Check/call check/fold bet/call bet/fold. Thanks
pokerstars Game #59648418055: Tournament #413010001, $1000+$50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XI (125/250) - 2011/03/22 22:46:48 ET
Table '413010001 29' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ender555 (7100 in chips)
Seat 2: el_klonkador (9969 in chips)
Seat 3: siola (9520 in chips)
Seat 5: The Lag rat (11630 in chips)
Seat 6: papain7 (6545 in chips)
Seat 7: ykings777 (14055 in chips)
Seat 8: maverick570 (4765 in chips)
Seat 9: Stammdogg (17369 in chips)
ender555: posts the ante 30
el_klonkador: posts the ante 30
siola: posts the ante 30
The Lag rat: posts the ante 30
papain7: posts the ante 30
ykings777: posts the ante 30
maverick570: posts the ante 30
Stammdogg: posts the ante 30
el_klonkador: posts small blind 125
siola: posts big blind 250
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to The Lag rat [Ah Ad]
The Lag rat: raises 305 to 555
papain7: folds
ykings777: folds
maverick570: folds
Stammdogg: calls 555
ender555: folds
el_klonkador: folds
siola: folds
*** FLOP *** [4d 3d 7h]
The Lag rat: bets 825
Stammdogg: raises 1175 to 2000
The Lag rat: calls 1175
*** TURN *** [4d 3d 7h] [5c]
The Lag rat: checks
deamon10 is connected
Stammdogg: checks
*** RIVER *** [4d 3d 7h 5c] [Kc] Pot 5700ish
The Lag rat: -
just curious on your thoughts for flatting the flop (well i think i know.. but others may not).. then we'll go from there.. on second thought.. putting in the 3b would help better define his range.. im not opposed to 3b calling a shove. but seems marginal... played as is.. turn is fine.. and gonna lead out for 3100-3800 on river and if he shoves.. dfasp'jfasjfasfj player dependent read but I may be able to find a fold
Edited By: uga7211 Mar 23rd, 2011 at 05:35 AM -
Weird spot @ the river...
Edited By: iPlayTourneys Mar 23rd, 2011 at 01:25 PM
I doubt he'll check back KK on the turn, so not afraid he just rivered us a very high % of the time.... He might have had a hand like 56s and flopped decent and raised for value. Or he might have just random overcards or suited aces as well.
A hand like A5s for example that could definitely raise here and put you in a shitty spot with better/Aces. He'll get so many folds and otherwise he will get a lot of turn/river decisions where he can force you to fold an overpair (for example now, if he would have bet the turn ~60-70% pot....... how hard r u puking?).
To understand his turn check he must have picked up some SD value or expected not to get called by worse and didn't want to get x/r-jammed on the turn there. Your range is pretty face up as TT+ here and he probably doesn't expect you to fold that and he might want to see another 'cheap' river.
Because our range is face up, the river becomes very tough imo. If we donk, we can't really call a jamm since villain can almost play perfectly against our range, which also includes KK. A jamm must be super strong from his part (or at least wanting to look very strong, which would be a sick line w/A5 imo vs a competent villain who can thing before using his 'snap/call bluff catch button'). But checking he will expect us to never really x/f here so when he bets he must have it more often then not, or he'll be leveling us hard.
I think the river should go check/check a ton of the time, but betting doesn't look like its going to get a lot of value. If he bets, I think we should probably fold but in game I would probably x/c...... -
what was your initial plan after flatting the flop?? c/call, c/call?
Edited By: edc5036 Mar 23rd, 2011 at 04:26 PM
this seems like a board texture where stammdogg could raise the flop with a variety of hands you still have pretty good equity vs, so I definitely agree flop call is best. His turn check confuses me though... and makes me think he most likely has a hand with showdown value. Don't see many 2pair combos he could have... and I expect a lot of his airball hands would be barreling here. So I'd give him a range of something like 33-77, 99-KK, 45s, 56s, 76s, and then some flush draw / airball hands. That's a rough estimate but lmk what you think.
Now in a vacuum you could just c/c river vs this range all day... except I think he will check behind with most of the hands you beat and fire a big barrel with the hands that beat you. and leading doesn't seem good b/c your hand is pretty face up and leaves us exploitable to a bluff raise.
it seems nitty but I'm really thinking c/f river might be best... we can assume he will just check it back at least a decent % of the time. In game I'm gonna have a real hard time pressing the FOLD button though. Think you gotta make the judgement call and go for c/f or c/c if you wanna be the hero. -
I'm not sure if this is an issue for you anymore(the being nitty part) but I remember for a fact when I was trying to have it for awhile and being an uber nit. Id get put in these exact spots where my range was pretty much face up and just be leveling the shit out of my self.
Dont really see any value in betting the river but I also hate losing value to his showdown range that just can check back. It really depends I think a lot on what you think he thinks about you, if your ever turning hands into bluffs , floating here or even ck/shoving as bluffs etc. That can be the hardest part some time in these spots, not knowing how much someone else knows about your game and vice versa. -
I think stammdog is the kind of high level player who would be capable of leveling us hard here tbh, I wouldnt exclude a bluff here especialy he knowing u r a decent/good player.
Still like mentioned above it seems like a bluffcatcher so the standard play would be to fold caus elike frank said "people" tend not to bluff tehre after checking turn.
If he bluffed or went for thin value just gotta accept u got outplayed imo. I prob fold. -
Good players outplay other good players every day. It's part of the game. We all have bluffed the shit out of each other at one time or another. You can't think badly of it or that you got owned or whatever because it just happens, you get owned and you own even between the same people over and over. But thinking long term it just won't show a profit calling unless you really know a player will go for it that often, and in that case the hand would play a bit differently most likely.
-
i agree on getting it in on the flop, i'm torn on sizing/or how to go about it though...cause I am assuming stam probably views you as on the tighter side and not having a 3600/folding range here(esp with ur stack size)...but at the sametime if he does have a flush draw you need to give him room to put it in...especially since you are holding the Ad, there aren't many flush draws that he would be making it 2k/calling ur shove with. had he been holding A5dd for instance,he can easily make it 2k with the intent of calling off all the chips vs. you, knowing u can put in many weaker draws. But if he is holding a hand like 89dd for instance, he can't 3b to 2k and call ur shove, BUT he can easily shove over ur 3600.

the_dean22 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
r u completely ruling out a set? if so, why?
Originally Posted by the_dean22
i agree on getting it in on the flop, i'm torn on sizing/or how to go about it though...cause I am assuming stam probably views you as on the tighter side and not having a 3600/folding range here(esp with ur stack size)...but at the sametime if he does have a flush draw you need to give him room to put it in...especially since you are holding the Ad, there aren't many flush draws that he would be making it 2k/calling ur shove with. had he been holding A5dd for instance,he can easily make it 2k with the intent of calling off all the chips vs. you, knowing u can put in many weaker draws. But if he is holding a hand like 89dd for instance, he can't 3b to 2k and call ur shove, BUT he can easily shove over ur 3600.
-
i assume that if we can play it so that those draws get it in over our 3b, this makes our aa play well enough against his range here to make it profitible. in other words the times he has the draws here make up for the other times its sets
Edited By: mcandrews3rd Mar 24th, 2011 at 04:10 AM
Reason: missed out a word -
I wouldve felt more comfortable and probably would have gotten it allin on the flop if I didn't have the ace of diamonds in my hand. Just didn't think I'd get it in good enough with my perceived image here. I ended betting like 2kish on the river and he then put in a huge raise and I folded. I felt like I played the river pretty bad. Do agree that check folding is probably best. Thanks everyone for the replies
-
Is it wierd that I would've check folded but like bet/calling?

apestyles is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
note to self: check raise more flops 40 bets deep people give you absurd respect in mtts these days apparently! I cant imagine any range where you feel uncomfortably getting it in on the flop against a good reg.
I feel like everyone playing online tourneys these days are comfortable slamming 25bbs with 88 utg but completely shut down postflop with anything over 30bbs. Maybe its correct idk and regs are raising flops that tight, I dont play many tournaments, but in my experience with stamm he plays quite well and tricky. -
Was thinking that as well actually
To be fair, 46 effective is fairly different from 30, and hands tend to play different postflop in 1ks than in most other online mtts these days...but you make a valid point otherwise.Originally Posted by amak316
note to self: check raise more flops 40 bets deep people give you absurd respect in mtts these days apparently! I cant imagine any range where you feel uncomfortably getting it in on the flop against a good reg.
I feel like everyone playing online tourneys these days are comfortable slamming 25bbs with 88 utg but completely shut down postflop with anything over 30bbs. Maybe its correct idk and regs are raising flops that tight, I dont play many tournaments, but in my experience with stamm he plays quite well and tricky. -
i think there is absolutely 0 chance that 3b/calling the flop is profitable here. labrat is never bluffing if he does that, and everyone knows that....just jam the flop if youre gonna raise.
as played...if i checked, i would check/fold...but i def think there's some value in betting...stam could have some sort of diamond draw that has a pair now, or he could just level himself into calling with something
Gags30 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.
-
He raises in position, which is different then x/r'ing + if this hand occurs i make a note and adjust in the future.
Originally Posted by amak316
note to self: check raise more flops 40 bets deep people give you absurd respect in mtts these days apparently! I cant imagine any range where you feel uncomfortably getting it in on the flop against a good reg.
No I really like that.. -
I really hate lab rats bet of 2k on the river, so 875 would fit that category too prob. He's really just giving away money as it's extremely unlikely for lab rat to have a straight and playing guessing games in a spot where you bet just to induce a massively bloated pot cannot be a good play. I think it's a clear c/f on the river and shouldn't be played any other way once you get to the river.
-
Edited By: edc5036 Mar 26th, 2011 at 04:55 PMum what good reg WOULDNT be flatting 33/44 pre here??? I really don't like getting it in on the flop, especially since we have the ace of diamonds so its hard for Stamdogg to even have a flush draw here. He will just about NEVER be calling a flop shove with worse, and when he does call we're way way behind.Originally Posted by onefingerortwo
if you dont have a 3 bet fold range then shove. you almost certainly have the best hand as most solid regs prolly dont flat 44 or 33 and you are basically just losing to 77 or 56ss which a good reg wont flat that often here either.
with that said we still want to get to showdown. river just becomes a really sick spot. c/f or b/c are my preferred options and its not every hand you can say that haha. I think ultimately its gotta come down to game flow and how you think Stamdogg perceives you... or how he thinks you think he perceives you :p -
Lol I can't tell if you're serious, but nobody who's winning at high stakes poker calls with 33 or 44 there. And to say stamdogg NEVER calls the flop shove with worse is an extremely absurd statement. He definitely can and will. I still stick by my previous post of not getting it in on flop but your statements are just absolutely ridiculous.
Originally Posted by edc5036
um what good reg WOULDNT be flatting 33/44 pre here??? I really don't like getting it in on the flop, especially since we have the ace of diamonds so its hard for Stamdogg to even have a flush draw here. He will just about NEVER be calling a flop shove with worse, and when he does call we're way way behind.
with that said we still want to get to showdown. river just becomes a really sick spot. c/f or b/c are my preferred options and its not every hand you can say that haha. I think ultimately its gotta come down to game flow and how you think Stamdogg perceives you... or how he thinks you think he perceives you :p -
I was completely serious at least about pre. I always go by the 20:1 rule for strictly setmining which is about exactly what Stamdogg's getting here effective. Plus on the button... would you just be folding your low pairs here? and if so how deep would you have to be before you'd consider flatting??
Originally Posted by Frank1The1Tank
Lol I can't tell if you're serious, but nobody who's winning at high stakes poker calls with 33 or 44 there. And to say stamdogg NEVER calls the flop shove with worse is an extremely absurd statement. He definitely can and will. I still stick by my previous post of not getting it in on flop but your statements are just absolutely ridiculous.
and okay obviously saying he will "never" call with worse on flop is a little absurd, but I truly can't seeing him calling with much that we beat if we just jamball the flop over his raise. Seems like he would be able to find a fold even with 88-JJ, and I would have to think 3betting pre>>>flatting with QQ+ here. certainly don't see him calling with a7 or something.... and we have the blocker to the most likely combo draw. -
He's not on the button, not that it matters because I wouldn't flat with 33 and 44 there either. Getting 20 to 1 in todays poker game at tougher tables is not nearly enough. You are purely set mining with those pairs whereas 77+ has actual showdown value vs the bottom of lab rats opening range. You need better than 20 to 1 because the 3 people behind will squeeze a non 0% of the time containing some bluffs and value hands. A good player won't stack off AA often enough (look at this hand as an example). If this were a $55 tournament by all means have a field day as everyone sucks there for the most part. But not in a $1k vs relatively tough players.
Similar Threads
-
3 Replies
2 Aces in the deck, they had to come on the turn and river, and of course did
Last Post: Nov 5th, 2007, 11:39 AM -
5 Replies
Quad aces DId i over bet the River?
By echobravo007 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Oct 28th, 2007, 03:20 PM - 0 Replies
- 13 Replies
- 0 Replies









