Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. pokerstars Game #55805582671: Tournament #402010433, $20+$2 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level III (20/40) - 2011/01/12 13:25:28 ET
    Table '402010433 23' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
    Seat 1: sizzlinbetta (2960 in chips)
    Seat 2: menslone (2565 in chips)
    Seat 3: pOmPaNoPiMp (3065 in chips)
    Seat 4: Feniks208 (2905 in chips)
    Seat 5: mtv97 (1625 in chips)
    Seat 6: SlevinUp (3045 in chips)
    Seat 7: bustuw72 (2885 in chips)
    Seat 8: Loose1990 (7910 in chips)
    Seat 9: okse54 (3040 in chips)
    bustuw72: posts small blind 20
    Loose1990: posts big blind 40
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to okse54 [Jc Jh]
    okse54: raises 60 to 100
    sizzlinbetta: folds
    menslone: folds
    pOmPaNoPiMp: calls 100
    Feniks208: folds
    mtv97 has timed out
    mtv97: folds
    mtv97 is sitting out
    SlevinUp: folds
    bustuw72: folds
    Loose1990: calls 60
    *** FLOP *** [3s Js 5c]
    mtv97 has returned
    Loose1990: checks
    okse54: bets 180
    pOmPaNoPiMp: calls 180
    Loose1990: folds
    *** TURN *** [3s Js 5c] [8h]
    okse54: bets 360
    pOmPaNoPiMp: calls 360
    *** RIVER *** [3s Js 5c 8h] [Qs]
    okse54: ????

    dont rly know much on the villian, i OPR'd him and found he has about 4500 MTTS at ABI $80 with a 7% ROI.

    so while hes not an elite player he prob has somewhat of a clue and isnt just clicking buttons

    wats your play on the river
     
  2. Missed str8 draw?
    As played....id prly bet river. Checking aint a bad option, maybe get a read from his river bet.
    A4 soooted is likely.
    Edited By: DFH Jan 12th, 2011 at 06:58 PM
  3. I would bet more on the turn. Here check-calling seems better than betting and then folding to a huge raise. Checking also gives him the opportunity to bluff his less strong hands which he might fold if we bet. He is either raising or folding to a river bet in most cases, and we wont be very comfortable calling a raise here.
  4. def bet
  5. I bet/fold. Prob a lot of hands that can call a bet but won't bet the river because they have showdown value but prob wont be good if they bet and are called.
  6. I bet/fold these spots. A lot of players aren't capable of bluff raising the river and if he had a set he most likely wouldve raised an earlier street.
  7.  
    Originally Posted by The Lab Rat View Post

    I bet/fold these spots. A lot of players aren't capable of bluff raising the river and if he had a set he most likely wouldve raised an earlier street.

    this is part of the reason im not so sure about B/F. how many hands in his range that hypothetically would call a river bet wouldnt raise on an earlier street.

    sets prob raise somewhere, i dont see all that many if any 2prs in his range and even 2prs might not just flat all the way down. and how many single pairs are calling a 3rd barrel on that river

    the only hand that prob could play that way and pay me off is JQ and im not even sure thats really in his range, i guess maybe like QQ/KK but meh im not rly feeling those

    are there hands that likely call a river bet here?
     
    Thread Starter
  8. you should probably C/F but I'd C/C cus i cant fold sets
  9. Hes plenty chips, so he could be chasing draws.
    Dont think its impossible he has a smaller set is it? (he said bowing to Labs/& your much greater experience) youve raised both the flop & turn.
    Theres 1400 chips in the pot on my reconing, why not bet 250 as if you want a call, if he shoves over that, I think you should seriously consider folding.
    Edit. But still think a smaller set is favourite and I would call if he shoved.
    Edited By: rayfox111 Jan 12th, 2011 at 10:03 PM
  10. What was the end result?
  11.  
    Originally Posted by okse54 View Post

    this is part of the reason im not so sure about B/F. how many hands in his range that hypothetically would call a river bet wouldnt raise on an earlier street.

    sets prob raise somewhere, i dont see all that many if any 2prs in his range and even 2prs might not just flat all the way down. and how many single pairs are calling a 3rd barrel on that river

    the only hand that prob could play that way and pay me off is JQ and im not even sure thats really in his range, i guess maybe like QQ/KK but meh im not rly feeling those

    are there hands that likely call a river bet here?

    I only see QJ for calling otr..

     
    Originally Posted by DFH View Post

    What was the end result?

    Pretty sur okse check and the villain maid a big riverbet...

     
    Originally Posted by The Lab Rat View Post

    I bet/fold these spots. A lot of players aren't capable of bluff raising the river and if he had a set he most likely wouldve raised an earlier street.

    I would follow the Rat line in this spot.
  12. If he had a flush draw hed be pretty bad imo since u bet almost pot on the flop and he should expect u to bet big on the turn, thats the only thing i woulda done different: bet more on the turn. Id c/c probably cause we dont get a worse hand to call anyway imo, hate bet folding after building up a pot.. Id either pay him off or catch a bluff. And i would snap call. If he checks behind and we lost a bit value whatever, he prob wont call anyway. Tough hand! Like also to see results
  13. for those of you that said to check/call the river, what bluffs do you expect him to ever turn up with?(64s maybe?) bet/folding is so much better than check/calling. You can always get called by worse on the river and check/folding just seems to weak with a set
  14. actually this is a tough spot so i dont know what the right move would be, just sayin how i probably would do it without having reads. ok lets say we make a 1/2 pot bet on the river out of position, i really would have problems to fold after commiting so many chips, as everybody else would.. it lets us with 1700 (if my calculation was right lol) in chips, far from crippled but still hurts. how much would u bet 1. without looking weak so villain raises light and represents the flush, and 2. to get worse hands to call? we have to make a small bet on the river imo but will (probably/maybe, depends on the player) get raised light because villain can be sure we do not have a flush . i really like to look weak in those spots to make sure i get value from worse hands... i mean if he has the flush, how much would he bet to make sure he gets value from us? probably 1/2 pot or even less, plus we get to see the hand and make a note on him. dont know if my argumentation is strong anough but i really dont like to turn my hand into i bluff since im not sure where im at here
  15. what lab rat said and c/f is absurd
    Edited By: FivePercentTint Jan 13th, 2011 at 12:36 PM
  16. I dont mind making it around 700 and folding to a raise. But I see some merit in the check call to catch bluffs etc, only problem is you cant control how much he bets. The way the hand played out he would probably bet the pot, around 1300 if he has the flush and its tough to call a bet that size.
  17. sry if i forgot to write this but i def could see myself c/f here, depends on the bet villain fires. really hard to put him on a hand here and an ugly river. no way he has a straight, doesnt make sense, but some ppl get married to flush draws and dont know if hes one of them. is 7% roi on ABI 80$ good? no clue, my abi is much lower. only hands that make sense somehow are pairs which turned into sets (or maybe not lol), 45s+, TJ, JQ... BUT i think a made hand woulda bet the flop in position on such a board, and how tf will he call a river bet with TJ on that board.. most likely will check behind with such a hand on that board but thats ok for me in such an ugly spot. that bein said i will prolly fold to every bet that is more than 1/2 pot cause its a value bet too often, here i really see the advantage to see his hand, what wont be the case if i fire the same bet im ready to call and then have to fold to a reraise... would be funny if he has QQ or something else absurd... dont attack me if im wrong here just posting my opinion, many said they would bet/fold but i see more disadvantages than advantages in taking that line
  18. I think AJ is a possibility, and I'd bet every street for value here. He'd probably fold the river, but I'd go the bet/sighfold to a raise route per Lab Rat.
    Edited By: CL Type-S49 Jan 13th, 2011 at 04:32 PM
     
  19. b/f >>>> c/f and you should probably be b/c against some villians

    lol @ c/f, seriously? he flopped top triples. if you check, it's gotta be w/ the intention of snapping IMO. giving this guy an awful lot of credit to be folding three jacks on the river
  20. For me, it depends a lot on the reads you have on him. But I suppose you have not much in the level 3 of a tournament.
    I would BET/CALL. I would bet like 1/4 or 1/3 so he thinks he has fold equity to his shove.
    IMO the most probable hands are a set or (AA,KK,TT,99). He could have AQ also (imo AK, JQ and AJ are less probable).
    If you make a 1/3 bet you can be called by hands like TT 99 JQ AQ that would probably check back the river.
    I think all the sets will raise the river for value. Even AA and KK and JQ can sometimes raise beause they will think that you would bet more with a flush or a set.
    The only hands I could play so passively and beat you are AsJs, JsQs and QQ...

    Do you guys think I am way wrong? (nobody said he would bet/call)
  21. If you bet/call, you beat nothing but 46o. I don't even think Pimp would raise that river with JQ and he most like is not going that line with 33 or 55
     
  22.  
    Originally Posted by CL Type-S49 View Post

    If you bet/call, you beat nothing but 46o. I don't even think Pimp would raise that river with JQ and he most like is not going that line with 33 or 55

    Abs this. Problem is he either has a made hand and will check behind, or he hits a draw and
    Bets the river, and he hits a draw here very often. He has position so why doesnt he raise the flop or turn with his made hand on a drawheavy board at least to see where hes at? If u really think about it betting river will cost us. Hate to c/f but if he fires a redic big bet its rarely a bluff, cause like i said he has to have a made hand on the flop, and at the same time has to think that he was behind from the start, whats pretty redicolous. He mabe makes a smallish value bet with JQ but thats it. And why should he call us down with top top? If hes scared that we gave jj+ why does he play aj at all if hes scared of an overpair on such a good board for aj.
  23. I'm bet calling against this type of villain and am shocked that I am in the minority here.

    This type of villain is going to almost always raise this flop with a FD (and he didn't), there are no plausible straights that got there and OP is barreling XJ/overpairs here 100% of the time. Once OP bets the river a higher buy-in villain is going to bluff this a whole lot of the time to blow us off of these exact hands. Villain doesn't expect you to have JJJ here (and almost never a flush) on a 3 street barrel so he is bluffing a hand that he doesn't expect to fold. So bet and don't fold.
     
  24. b/f > c/c > b/c > c/f
    3
  25. This is a b/f although shallow stack sizes by the river make it awkward. I probably end up bet/spite calling because the price is absurd. Def bet more on the turn.

    BTW if I was in the villain's shoes with 55 I would certainly consider just calling the turn as well ... not every reg takes the absurdly transparent CIB line on the turn.
  26. okse, any chance of the end result of this hand.
    Edited By: rayfox111 Jan 14th, 2011 at 11:07 PM
  27. I would bet around 685-735 on river here and pretty confident too...if villain raises or jams then insta fold... but I just don't see too many hands in his range that can beat you with that board unless he made his flush with some sort of combo. Def a tough spot but I would go with b/f.

Similar Threads