Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Satties to multiple tournies

Reply to Thread
  1. Shinerbock83 Shinerbock83 is offline

    San Antonio, TX
    United States

    Posts: 52
    Joined: Sep 07

    Aug 19th, 2009 (8/19/2009 8:28pm)

    I just had an idea in my head which at first glace seems pretty neat to me. I was just wondering other peoples opinions. My idea was a little like a PS extreme satty to the wcoop events buttt instead of to a wcoop event you get a sunday major satty. For example a $50 satty that would attract alot of runners and winners would get entry to Warm-up, Million and Mulligan. Buy in may have to be $100+ but would still be sweet imo. Anyways how stupid is my idea?
     
  2. YULivin4 YULivin4 is offline

    Carol Stream, IL
    United States

    Posts: 964
    Joined: Apr 06

    Aug 19th, 2009 (8/19/2009 8:35pm) in reply to Shinerbock83

    They could market that pretty well...only problem would be when they would have them because the largest turnouts for the sattys is on Sunday and by then it would be too late/early for the warm up
  3. Shinerbock83 Shinerbock83 is offline

    San Antonio, TX
    United States

    Posts: 52
    Joined: Sep 07

    Aug 19th, 2009 (8/19/2009 9:49pm) in reply to YULivin4

    Very good point. Maybe run 2 or 3 a week during the night. Like one Tue night, one Thur night and one or two on Saturday. It is very likely you are right that Tue and Thurs satties would not yeild many seats. Say buy in is $50, you wouldnt need too many runners to make a couple seats to the 3 majors mentioned in OP. I def believe a Saturday night version of this would yeild many seats for Sunday. I know I would grind those every week because I usually only play the million or the WU(one or the other) and it would be nice to play the WU, Million and 2nd chance or WE.
     
    Thread Starter
Reply to Thread