Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

SCT, what do you do here?

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2
  1. secretscar secretscar is offline

    Longview, WA
    United States

    Posts: 40
    Joined: Oct 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 8:16am)

    pokerstars Game #24326126324: Tournament #136336585, $10+$1 Hold'em No Limit - Level V (75/150) - 2009/01/27 9:13:58 ET
    Table '136336585 51' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
    Seat 1: AQUA RAIDER (13268 in chips)
    Seat 2: 1337 player (9550 in chips)
    Seat 3: PokerKoter (4292 in chips)
    Seat 4: zwaano (6343 in chips) is sitting out
    Seat 5: secretscarr (7125 in chips)
    Seat 6: Telecommuter (9160 in chips)
    Seat 7: bila46 (18981 in chips)
    Seat 8: EspBju (4850 in chips)
    Seat 9: novello (11196 in chips)
    bila46: posts small blind 75
    EspBju: posts big blind 150
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to secretscarr [8s 8d]
    novello: raises 450 to 600
    AQUA RAIDER: folds
    1337 player: folds
    PokerKoter: folds
    zwaano: folds
    secretscarr: ???????
  2. 8888kush 8888kush is offline

    GA
    United States

    Posts: 1,497
    Joined: Mar 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 8:32am) in reply to secretscar

    He jams and hits 2 outter or wins the flip
  3. sandler1860 sandler1860 is offline

    Dayton, OH
    United States

    Posts: 3,394
    Joined: Nov 05

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 8:48am) in reply to secretscar

    Since you only wanted his opinion on the hand, why not just PM him?

    Can I predict what SCT would do? You know, since Im not allowed to give my advice and all?
     
  4. Kochan Kochan is offline

    Sydney
    Australia

    Posts: 79
    Joined: Dec 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 8:50am) in reply to sandler1860

    reraise to 3.2k but fold to a shove...
     
  5. bigblacktruck bigblacktruck is offline

    Peterborough
    Canada

    Posts: 564
    Joined: Sep 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 8:54am) in reply to Kochan

     
    Originally Posted by Kochan View Post

    reraise to 3.2k but fold to a shove...

    The only problem with this would be his shove would be giving you better than 2:1 on your remaining stack. Could you get away with a lower RR?
     
  6. Wein Wein is offline Sunday Millionaire

    Posts: 9,189
    Joined: May 05

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 8:55am) in reply to sandler1860

     
    Originally Posted by sandler1860 View Post


    Can I predict what SCT would do? You know, since Im not allowed to give my advice and all?

     
  7. bigblacktruck bigblacktruck is offline

    Peterborough
    Canada

    Posts: 564
    Joined: Sep 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 9:00am) in reply to secretscar

    I for one would like to know what what Sandler or Wein would do.
     
  8. sirswish6 sirswish6 is offline i mean super business

    Palatine, IL
    United States

    Posts: 2,854
    Joined: Apr 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 9:04am) in reply to secretscar

    what would brian boitano do?
    145 
  9. HighPoint HighPoint is offline

    Suva
    Fiji

    Posts: 193
    Joined: Oct 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 9:17am) in reply to sirswish6

    What would Chuck Liddell do?
  10. Cuthroat187 Cuthroat187 is offline

    Norwalk, CT
    United States

    Posts: 1,951
    Joined: Jun 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 9:22am) in reply to HighPoint

    What would Al Pacino do?
  11. railbot railbot is offline

    Miami, FL
    United States

    Posts: 5,255
    Joined: Oct 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 9:39am) in reply to Cuthroat187

    stop and go any flop ftw
  12. holdplz holdplz is offline

    Mexico

    Posts: 1,000
    Joined: May 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 9:53am) in reply to sirswish6

     
    Originally Posted by sirswish6 View Post

    what would brian boitano do?

    QFSouthParkReference that i never understood but vividly remember
    128 
  13. xxjondxx xxjondxx is offline

    Buffalo, NY
    United States

    Posts: 1,720
    Joined: Apr 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 9:56am) in reply to secretscar

    ezy game
     11
  14. wackyJaxon wackyJaxon is offline Admin X

    Vilnius
    Lithuania

    Posts: 12,264
    Joined: Apr 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 10:07am) in reply to secretscar

    OCHOOOOOOOOOOOO
      1 
  15. Annette_15 Annette_15 is offline

    Norway

    Posts: 1,803
    Joined: Jan 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 10:10am) in reply to xxjondxx

    fold> call> shove> r/call> r/fold
     121
  16. pikappraider78 pikappraider78 is offline

    Gainesville, FL
    United States

    Posts: 2,039
    Joined: Aug 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 10:12am) in reply to Annette_15

    ez fold
     
  17. 7DeLuX 7DeLuX is offline

    Orlando, FL
    United States

    Posts: 1,357
    Joined: Nov 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 10:13am) in reply to Annette_15

     
    Originally Posted by Annette_15 View Post

    fold> call> shove> r/call> r/fold

    HEY! ARE YOU SCT??? WHO DO U THINK YOU ARE?????

    no but seriously this prob tilts me more then running ks < as deep in the mil..

    there are other people at p5s who are competent enough to give good advice

    good day sir..
     3
  18. Jax0910 Jax0910 is offline

    Burnham-on-Sea
    United Kingdom

    Posts: 404
    Joined: Jul 08

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 10:26am) in reply to secretscar

    what would chuck norris do?
  19. ficha19 ficha19 is offline

    Posts: 611
    Joined: Feb 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 10:45am) in reply to Jax0910

    u can call just for set value or implied odds...
    looking at expressed odds its a fold, not enough in there and i dont think u want to mess with a larger stack who just made a large raise utg with a marginal hand...

    fold>call>raise

    but wtf do i know everytime i post someone quotes me saying: this is horrible.
  20. 7DeLuX 7DeLuX is offline

    Orlando, FL
    United States

    Posts: 1,357
    Joined: Nov 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 10:48am) in reply to ficha19

     
    Originally Posted by ficha19 View Post

    u can call just for set value or implied odds...
    looking at expressed odds its a fold, not enough in there and i dont think u want to mess with a larger stack who just made a large raise utg with a marginal hand...

    fold>call>raise

    but wtf do i know everytime i post someone quotes me saying: this is horrible.

    horrible

    edit: i couldnt help myself obv jk
     3
  21. alit alit is offline

    Solbergelva
    Norway

    Posts: 18
    Joined: Aug 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 11:39am) in reply to Annette_15

     
    Originally Posted by Annette_15 View Post

    fold> call> shove> r/call> r/fold

    Why is it wrong to call here for set odds? (because of the 4K stack in BB in case he ships...?) - i believe i would call here a lot..... maybe i have to rethink...

    hjelp en landsmann her anette:-)
  22. andressoprano andressoprano is offline whaddya think of my game?

    Anchorage, AK
    United States

    Posts: 5,224
    Joined: Jan 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 11:49am) in reply to Wein

     
    Originally Posted by Wein View Post

     
    Originally Posted by sandler1860 View Post


    Can I predict what SCT would do? You know, since Im not allowed to give my advice and all?

     1
  23. OneTime_10 OneTime_10 is offline

    Chicago, IL
    United States

    Posts: 866
    Joined: Nov 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 11:52am) in reply to alit

     
    Originally Posted by alit View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Annette_15 View Post

    fold> call> shove> r/call> r/fold

    Why is it wrong to call here for set odds? (because of the 4K stack in BB in case he ships...?) - i believe i would call here a lot..... maybe i have to rethink...

    hjelp en landsmann her anette:-)

    She never said it was "wrong". If u can't understand, what she meant was folding (is better than) calling (is better than) shoving (is better than) raise/calling (is better than) raise/folding. So calling is actually the second best option in her opinion.
     
  24. alit alit is offline

    Solbergelva
    Norway

    Posts: 18
    Joined: Aug 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 12:07pm) in reply to OneTime_10

     
    Originally Posted by OneTime_10 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by alit View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Annette_15 View Post

    fold> call> shove> r/call> r/fold

    Why is it wrong to call here for set odds? (because of the 4K stack in BB in case he ships...?) - i believe i would call here a lot..... maybe i have to rethink...

    hjelp en landsmann her anette:-)

    She never said it was "wrong". If u can't understand, what she meant was folding (is better than) calling (is better than) shoving (is better than) raise/calling (is better than) raise/folding. So calling is actually the second best option in her opinion.

    English isn't my first language, so i probably got this wrong. I understood that she ment fold over call over raise etc... (symbols are the same in norwegian...lol) I still believe that choosing the second best option according to a top class player would have to be described as a mistake....(even tough a small one)?
  25. Clayton_27 Clayton_27 is offline

    San Diego, CA
    United States

    Posts: 231
    Joined: Jul 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 12:13pm) in reply to alit

    scott would probably freak out that he's playing a $10 online poker tournament, and subsequently would jump off a bridge
     
  26. myzislow myzislow is offline

    CA
    United States

    Posts: 460
    Joined: Nov 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 12:46pm) in reply to secretscar

    I def like a re raise to see where you are at, as this helps to define your hand. If the original raiser shuvs then I would fold as you're defnitely up against AA, KK at worst. You're welcome and GL!
  27. MarkFSU1 MarkFSU1 is offline

    Posts: 3,464
    Joined: Apr 07

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 1:33pm) in reply to myzislow

    its an ez fold a large % of the time...
     
  28. rocksolid124 rocksolid124 is offline

    Denham Springs, LA
    United States

    Posts: 9,352
    Joined: Sep 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 1:39pm) in reply to secretscar

    Is it a bad set mining situation just because of the fact that even though he has the stack that can give you 10-1 implied, the very fact that he's simply not stacking off in that spot a high enough percentage of the time that you need more like 12-1 or even 15-1 implied?
  29. SCTrojans SCTrojans is offline

    Los Angeles, CA
    United States

    Posts: 6,026
    Joined: Aug 06

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 1:39pm) in reply to Clayton_27

     
    Originally Posted by Clayton_27 View Post

    scott would probably freak out that he's playing a $10 online poker tournament, and subsequently would jump off a bridge

    and f>c>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>>>>>>anythingelse
     13
  30. BigRed0000 BigRed0000 is offline

    Austin, TX
    United States

    Posts: 521
    Joined: Jan 08

    Jan 27th, 2009 (1/27/2009 1:45pm) in reply to SCTrojans

    LOOOOOL what clayton and Annette said.
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2