Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Shaun Deeb 180 Strategy???????

Reply to Thread
  1. TonyBlaze TonyBlaze is offline

    Posts: 808
    Joined: Apr 06

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:10pm)

    Can't find it...does anyone have the link?
     
  2. YoungGunKid YoungGunKid is offline

    Texarkana, AR
    United States

    Posts: 108
    Joined: Mar 09

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:13pm) in reply to TonyBlaze

    Shaun Deeb's guide to beating 180 man's<A target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Number=9209807">

    http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Number=9209807</A>

    Your Welcome
  3. TonyBlaze TonyBlaze is offline

    Posts: 808
    Joined: Apr 06

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:16pm) in reply to YoungGunKid

    Thanks!
     
    Thread Starter
  4. iatetheredcrayon iatetheredcrayon is offline

    Austin, TX
    United States

    Posts: 1,722
    Joined: Mar 06

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:17pm) in reply to YoungGunKid

     
    Originally Posted by YoungGunKid View Post

    Shaun Deeb's guide to beating 180 man's<a target="_blank" rel="nofollow" href="http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Number=9209807" >

    http://archives1.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Number=9209807</a>

    You're Welcome

    FYP

    You're welcome.
  5. kasey_gcp kasey_gcp is offline

    Ozark, MO
    United States

    Posts: 2,302
    Joined: Feb 07

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:18pm) in reply to iatetheredcrayon

    Isnt it like 4 years old? Alot's changed since then...

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
  6. ApesAreFun ApesAreFun is offline Moderator/Euro Donk

    Norway

    Posts: 6,246
    Joined: Aug 07

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:19pm) in reply to kasey_gcp

     
    Originally Posted by kasey_gcp View Post

    Isnt it like 4 years old? Alot's changed since then...

    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    Not in those tournaments... People still suck in them!
     906 
  7. kasey_gcp kasey_gcp is offline

    Ozark, MO
    United States

    Posts: 2,302
    Joined: Feb 07

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:22pm) in reply to ApesAreFun

     
    Originally Posted by ApesAreFun View Post

    Not in those tournaments... People still suck in them!

    Trust me i know, i've got like 90% roi in em and i'm ranked 13th in avg profit at that buyin level on sharkscope, but i remember reading that strategy he posted and i would say not all of it holds as true now as it used to...
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">
  8. TonyBlaze TonyBlaze is offline

    Posts: 808
    Joined: Apr 06

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:23pm) in reply to kasey_gcp

     
    Originally Posted by kasey_gcp View Post

     Isnt it like 4 years old?  Alot's changed since then...

    <INPUT id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><INPUT onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    I just remember I liked some of his thoughts and wanted to read it again because I couldnt remember it all.
     
    Thread Starter
  9. TonyBlaze TonyBlaze is offline

    Posts: 808
    Joined: Apr 06

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 6:25pm) in reply to kasey_gcp

    I realize it may be in part out of date I wanted to read it again for some of his chip accumulation thoughts that may still be valid. I have read it many times before and it seems to evoke an idea or two .... I just lost the link
     
    Thread Starter
  10. Whatshoulditbe Whatshoulditbe is offline

    Posts: 1,491
    Joined: Apr 07

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 9:25pm) in reply to kasey_gcp

     
    Originally Posted by kasey_gcp View Post

    Trust me i know, i've got like 90% roi in em and i'm ranked 13th in avg profit at that buyin level on sharkscope, but i remember reading that strategy he posted and i would say not all of it holds as true now as it used to...
    <input id="gwProxy" type="hidden"><input onclick="jsCall();" id="jsProxy" type="hidden">

    This. It's a game strictly about adapting or staying one step ahead. Chances are tons of people have read that strategy and the games have gotten tougher although it may not seem like it much.

    TBH I feel the same way about training videos/books you name it anything that teaches poker. It may be an applicable winning strategy now, but in time it will become out dated.

    Start discussing hands with better players than yourself OP. imo this is what will help you learn the most.
     
  11. Kreuznagel Kreuznagel is offline Banned Troll

    Frankfurt Am Main
    Germany

    Posts: 179
    Joined: Apr 09

    Dec 10th, 2009 (12/10/2009 9:51pm) in reply to Whatshoulditbe

    Bunch of useless, incoherent run-on sentences, like all of Deeb's posts.
  12. Drewace34 Drewace34 is offline

    New Westminster
    Canada

    Posts: 1,961
    Joined: Jan 08

    Dec 11th, 2009 (12/11/2009 1:24am) in reply to Whatshoulditbe

     
    Originally Posted by Whatshoulditbe View Post

    This. It's a game strictly about adapting or staying one step ahead. Chances are tons of people have read that strategy and the games have gotten tougher although it may not seem like it much.

    TBH I feel the same way about training videos/books you name it anything that teaches poker. It may be an applicable winning strategy now, but in time it will become out dated.

    Start discussing hands with better players than yourself OP. imo this is what will help you learn the most.

    couldn't have said it better myself....100% this ^^^ imo this approach is one step behind optimal...

    the game of poker doesnt change, what changes is the villians level of thinking (good, bad, aggro, tight etc..) even the worst of the worst of players r adaptin and understandin some advance plays its understandin where exactly thier at to play the most optimally against imo
     
Reply to Thread

Similar Threads