[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
As we all know, Josh fields is a known thief and multiaccounter. I personally do not think that he should be allowed to play at PCA. While "Zee" Justin Bonomo was allowed to play, I feel that his situation may be a little different, but I don't think that ZeeJustin should have been allowed to play at PCA either.
Though I have no doubt that Justin still plays online (sponsored by bodog), evidence of him multiaccounting is not present. GBmantis has openly admitted to how much JJ has won, how much he owns, etc. He has made it clear that he still plays online and has won majors under various screen names.
This is evidenced by the fact that Stealthmunk was banned for being associated with his FTP SNs. I think that pokerstars should ban him from PCA. If you agree sign below and I will send this link to Stars
DISCLAIMER: I only mention this because Stars runs this tournament and it is not in the USA. He can be banned directly by stars for his offenses. I know that B&M won't ban him in the US -
i believe he should play, his money is as green as anyone elses.........and multiaccounting live is an absolute bitch, not even worth the effort really
-
I was looking forward to the field sizes dropping on stars about 20% the week of PCA. Please let him play live.
-
This isnt Natzi Germany and its LIVE poker....If he pays the buy in fee ......he can play tourney.
-
Nazi* and thanks for your input. Its not just "LIVE" poker...it's put on by stars, an online site which he was banned from for multiaccounting
-
OP im sorry to say but this is idiotic to think he should not be allowed to play live even though the tournament is run by stars.
-
PCA is an EPT event which although affiliated with pokerstars, pokerstars doesn't get final say.
This topic has been brought up before prior to zeejustin live debut.
Josh can and will be playing in the PCA. (and crushing it, ldo) -
Wouldnt that be funny if it WAS Nazi Germany? Oh, the good times to be had by all, wearing leiderhosen, drinking beer, peeing in the Rhine...
good times...good times....
i cant stand idiots who compare every little thing with nazi germany...its just lazy -
THIS IS SUCHA JOKE POST...
Let the kid play and im sure he will do great....
F THE JJ HATERS!
=MOOK= -
Jon you would like him to if he was backing you and winning majors for you :)
-
ill allow it.
-
People have been banned for much much less:
Harrah's Bans Richard "Quiet Lion" Brodie from their Casinos, World Series of Poker

<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td bgcolor="#cc0000" height="2" width="100%">
</td></tr></tbody></table> 
This piece of news is absolutely mind-boggling to me, but it's true, and I can't say that I am surprised considering how the World Series of Poker has been run so far.
Richard "Quiet Lion" Brodie, who is a fixture at Full Tilt Poker, received a certified letter from Harrah's on May 10th, stating that he will no longer be allowed to set foot inside of Caesar's Palace (now owned by Harrah's) or any other Harrah's property in Nevada, California and Arizona. Brodie was one of a number of "high-rollers" that was banned from Harrah's properties. Obviously this means that he will not be able to play at the World Series of Poker.
For those of you who don't know, Richard Brodie was the original author of Microsoft Word, and employee #7 at Microsoft. He is obviously very rich.
The funny thing about this situation is that Brodie stated that he only played two games at Caesar's Palace: poker and video poker. Now, the house is taking their rake on each hand of poker, so Brodie didn't get banned for winning big at poker. Harrah's banned Brodie because he was a big winner at video poker. Video poker!
It's not like he was counting cards in blackjack, or running up a huge winning streak in sports betting. That would be different. Harrah's banned Brodie from their casinos because he got lucky playing video poker, and managed to hit four royal flushes. A game in which the "house" has it coded into their computer program the exact % amount that their customers will win over time. It is honestly ridiculous, and I can only hope that this story gets out, and Harrah's softens their stance. For a casino to ban someone for winning at video poker is absolutely ridiculous, and I feel sorry for Brodie, who doesn't deserve this fate. At all. -
Exactly^^ He's a POS and if I ever see him live, i'm gonna stomp him.
-
For the record, I'm not taking a stand on the issue, I just remember that story from last year and it kind of made me sick. Anyone know if this travesty was ever reversed, or is Richard Brodie perma-banned from Harrahs properties?
-
Edit:they let him play
-
i thought video poker was supposed to be random by law... you can put payouts as whatever you like, but the cards dealt were to be random.
not sure where i heard it, so it may be wrong.
EDIT: no offense, but anyone feeling sorry for richard brodie is what's ridiculous. unless like his mom dies or something, of course. -
so he is just a total life luckbox, that must be sweet
-
Yea, I agree all 16 year old kids who f up should just be punished for life.
Edit: this could be teh dumbest post I've ever read. -
dont be afraid of how many horses he has and chips being passed off at the breaks. his fingers also dont mean hearts spades diamonds and clubs
-
I think that anyone who's ever cheated in any substantial way (obviously JJ counts) and been caught for it should not be allowed to play the game whenever it is possible to stop them. Can't really stop him online, can stop him live at this tournament, definitely should.
-
dah you might, MIGHT hit him but he probably has enough money to have you killed later so go ahead and push your luck lol
-
f cheaters...ban him
-
Lol true...i really would though. Not because i think im a badass or whatever. I'm not just some online poker player nerd who talks a big game either. I play live every night and listen to people bitch about "soooo much cheating online". I used to defend online poker but what can I say now?
-
if he pays for the buy in then for sure he can play.. until he's caught cheating in live poker i don't see why he should be banned. but if he qualified on pokerstars then it's obviously a problem... it would mean that pokerstars are being apathetic about cheaters creating new accounts and using new IP addresses.
Similar Threads
-
17 Replies
Why is 1BIGDUMBDONK still allowed to play on AP/UB?
By GRIZZKID33 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Dec 3rd, 2010, 03:31 AM -
423 Replies
*MESSAGE/APOLOGY FROM JJPRODIGY/JOSH FIELD**
By gbmantis in Poker Community
Last Post: Dec 30th, 2007, 01:01 PM -
63 Replies
Cutting Down on Buyins & How to Play Larger Fields
By Mkind16 in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Sep 28th, 2007, 07:25 PM -
5 Replies
Are two people allowed to play under the same account?
By sloverville in Poker Discussion
Last Post: Mar 20th, 2007, 06:18 PM - 3 Replies









