Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Seat 1: hopeUsuck2 (1593 in chips)
    Seat 2: lapointe23 (2151 in chips)
    Seat 3: cghm69 (713 in chips)
    Seat 4: ackypoo (4297 in chips)
    Seat 5: vangink (3975 in chips)
    Seat 6: Rob314 (2790 in chips)
    Seat 7: Avery790 (1665 in chips)
    Seat 8: wtf ru doing (2901 in chips) is sitting out
    Seat 9: Obiwan48 (2910 in chips)
    vangink: posts small blind 25
    Rob314: posts big blind 50
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to ackypoo [2s Td]
    Avery790: folds
    wtf ru doing: folds
    Obiwan48: folds
    hopeUsuck2: folds
    lapointe23: calls 50
    cghm69: folds
    ackypoo: raises 127 to 177
    vangink: folds
    Rob314: folds
    lapointe23: calls 127
    *** FLOP *** [5d Ac 2d]
    lapointe23: checks
    ackypoo: bets 348
  2. even annette folds that preflop EDIT: I think

    Isolating limpers in position is a good strategy, but wait for something a little more playable than T2o imo.

    As played, you have to bet that flop, just too good of a flop to cbet. Obv fold to any action
    2
  3. Yes
  4. arent cards irrelevant here?
    Thread Starter
  5. is this a joke? lol. but c-betting this is ok i guess, more often than not limp-callers will fold with an Ace or King showing up.imho.
  6. Its spew without antes most of the time unless u think the limper will fold preflop. But u can really do it with any two if u want to.
  7. no...this isnt a joke.

    sure it looks ugly, but am i going to win more pots playing like this or lose more?
    Thread Starter
  8. but dont i need to build up a stack before then?
    shouldnt i be doing this with low blinds still? obvioulsy if 2+ people limp im folding.
    Thread Starter
  9. it doesnt really look ugly to make a move with ATC but with that potsize and no antes (just as annette said) it's certainly spewey. in general i would think that you might win more pots in situations like these than you lose, simply because limp-callers are generally weak. but everytime you risk twice as much as you can get, so you need to do better than that to jusitify the play. and i do not think that you can trap a limp-caller with a hidden monster here, thus giving you no extravalue from this play, coz. he will fold everytime against aggression unless he himself hits the flop hard. imho.
  10. tyty all for your ideas
    Thread Starter

Similar Threads