[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
can someone with experience explain to me how i would go about staking a player in say the sunday tournies...what is a normal cut, does he get an hourly rate he doesnt cash?? what if he plays for 4 hours and bubbles he gets nothing? thanks casino-kid
-
The terms depend on a couple different things including make-up and if it's a series/single event.
Example:
Let's say you are staking a player for the stars million and only the stars million this sunday and don't expect anything in return if he doesn't cash. A standard % is 75/25 w/ you obv getting the larger portion. The horse doesn't get an hourly wage, or anything if he doesnt cash, because basically he is free-rolling for 25% of the prizepool which is hugely +EV for him.
EDIT: Obv SCT beats me to it...do you ever sleep?? Anyways if you're doing make-up what he posted is standard. -
i was thinking a whole month, 2 tournies a day, and 2 sunday tournies...ie. 50/50 daily on fulttilt, daily 50 on stars. sunday million on stars and whatever they call it on fultilt....so i like the 75/25 split , but with the schedule i talkd about does he deserve anything for his time? pleas explain make up term you used...Thanks so much
-
There is an atricle covering this in this monthes bluff mag, you guys covered most of it tho ^^^
-
what's make-up?
-
I beleive make up is:
If i say put in 10 $109 mtt;s so about $1000 worth and u dont cash in any, but on the 11th one cash for $2500, you would pay me back the $1000 in makeup then spilt the profits from the previous tourney -
so you would both pay your backer completely back, and then on top of that split the remaining profits? so like $750 each?
-
I beleive so Mcdiddy, u have to usually payback what u have lost in previous tourenys. Then split profits after that
-
i never figured that because there are some great winning players who are being staked, i figured the whole perk was that they got their buy-ins for free and provided security.
But if they had to pay back all the buy-ins plus more then what's the point? -
WEll mcdiddy the point is u still cant lose if ur the player. But as far as the backer goes if u were doing say 1k tourneys, and he played 10 with no cashes and lost 10k, then cashed for 15k, it would not be fair to the backer at all if all he got is $7500 and still be down
The player shud have to pay back 10k
Then the remaining 5k be split 50/50 - buyin is usally what i hear -
so the player would still be backed for the 11th tourney also? 'cause if not then there is still a chance for the player to lose. and if so then when's the line drawn? what if you lose your first tourney then win the second, do u payback the buy-ins for both? or is the first one waived because u paid of the backer so quickly?
on whether or not its fair, it obv depends on the backing arrangements. if two people agrre that make-up is fair, who am i to tell them otherwise? if another situation says that the backer can only win money on the tourneys entered and the prize pool of that one without make-up, then that's fair also. -
stake back 50/50










