[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
OK, given the recent quality PD threads, such as the BeL0Wab0Ve thread in a similar spot to this one, I am going to give P5s another go for a serious strategy discussion.
This is the Final Table of the big Sunday 300K GTD $100 Rebuy. I have observed rookie 3-betting LP raises quite a lot during the final 2-3 tables and he generally makes it less than a full shove even when he has under 20BBs.
As such can I ever find a fold here and why?
pokerstars Game #22309735112: Tournament #120443196, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XXVI (15000/30000) - 2008/11/23 20:55:39 ET
Table '120443196 2' 9-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Zpaceman (850379 in chips)
Seat 2: TherookieQQ9 (535579 in chips)
Seat 3: SixthSenSe19 (1820997 in chips)
Seat 4: wmdbaker (310526 in chips)
Seat 5: toweliestar (567824 in chips)
Seat 6: Tmay420 (445214 in chips)
Seat 7: lauraj (343348 in chips)
Seat 9: wywrotX (673133 in chips)
Zpaceman: posts the ante 3000
TherookieQQ9: posts the ante 3000
SixthSenSe19: posts the ante 3000
wmdbaker: posts the ante 3000
toweliestar: posts the ante 3000
Tmay420: posts the ante 3000
lauraj: posts the ante 3000
wywrotX: posts the ante 3000
TherookieQQ9: posts small blind 15000
SixthSenSe19: posts big blind 30000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Zpaceman [Ah Td]
wmdbaker: folds
toweliestar: folds
Tmay420: folds
lauraj: folds
wywrotX: folds
Zpaceman: raises 37775 to 67775
TherookieQQ9: raises 127725 to 195500
SixthSenSe19: folds
Zpaceman: -
Wow hes back. I have actually replied in a post or two as to where you have been. I do hope that you get some srious replies.
I know that you have what you think is a read on his play, now how does he see you? I'm folding here if I'm you. I mean you've hardly invested at all, he may be pot committed and he does this with the big satck still to act behind him. easy fold IMO. -
even though as you say rookie been 3betting a lot this is a small trap raise OOP begging for a 4bet shove IMHO
this really is a fold 100% of the time not really much to discuss (unless you playing a donkfest) but this is FT of 100r so you must be able to see this is a trap -
That is part of my thinking: this is so obviously a trap. If he simply jams here I snap call without a second thought, but by 3-betting small, I immediately think he is setting a trap, but isn't that too obvious?
First level thinking: It is a trap = fold
Second level thinking: He thinks I will perceive his small reraise as strength and is therefore making this play with a weak hand = shove
Third level thinking: He thinks that I will perceive the obvious trap as too obvious and therefore read it as weak, so he is really doing this with a strong hand to deceive me = fold
So which level do we put him on here? -
Yes, we have history and this may play into our actions here. In the final few tables of a $1K Venetian Deepstack tourny this summer I shoved a perfect reraise stack over a MP raise from the SB with Q6 (I think) and Rookie woke up with AK in the BB and I sucked-out a massive pot, propelling me to the FT and him on his way out of the tourny.
He was visibly upset about this at the time, his crew subsequently criticized my play in that tournament (I finished 8th when I made one reshove too many) and one of his railers had even confirmed in the chat earlier on in this tourny that he was out to get me.
I don't take things personally when I'm playing, but I think the above gave me the perception that he would somehow try to outplay me and that, in general, he thinks he is a better player than me. -
Seems like you are really overthinking this spot imo. Judging by this post and the general tone, i'm gonna say you snap 4 bet all in and he snapped with aq/ak etc and you lost.
While it is a tough spot, I do think you can find a fold especially this early in the FT, you will find a better spot, even if you do think he's 3 betting because
a) he's out to get you
b) he knows your calling range is pretty narrow given the table dynamics
c) he knows you know he knows all of these things
imo -
Going to have to agree with what others have said. I really don't think leveling comes much into play here. It's all about stack sizes, positions, and ranges. Based on what you said of him, even though you were caught in a live mtt, he likely just assumes you're a good player. That said, his raise does seem exceptionally strong this early in the FT, and I don't know anything about therookie's game. Like I said in the bel0w thread, it's probably not correct to shove here 100% of the time, but it can't be right to fold here 100% of the time either.
-
it looks like the only way to play it is raise/call imo..
-
So basically what you are saying is that you don't know 100%?
Originally Posted by Frank1The1Tank
Going to have to agree with what others have said. I really don't think leveling comes much into play here. It's all about stack sizes, positions, and ranges. Based on what you said of him, even though you were caught in a live mtt, he likely just assumes you're a good player. That said, his raise does seem exceptionally strong this early in the FT, and I don't know anything about therookie's game. Like I said in the bel0w thread, it's probably not correct to shove here 100% of the time, but it can't be right to fold here 100% of the time either.
FWIW, I think AT is a fold here... Doesn't this come down to ranges.. if his range is wide.. how wide? -
From a pot odds perspective, it is a 465k bet for a pot of 1119k (assuming he never folds when we shove), so we need 41.5% equity.
I think his range can be somewhat looser than that, e.g.:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 45.715% 41.70% 04.01% 1490936376 143523048.00 { ATo }
Hand 1: 54.285% 50.27% 04.01% 1797308280 143523048.00 { 22+, A8s+, KTs+, QTs+, JTs, A8o+, KQo }
For my equity to be below 41.5% I need to make his range:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 41.361% 35.83% 05.53% 905595612 139736352.00 { ATo }
Hand 1: 58.639% 53.11% 05.53% 1342292388 139736352.00 { 55+, A8s+, A8o+ }
So the question becomes, do we put his range as tight or tighter than that, given that he 3-bets LP raises a lot, has a very robusto BR from recent scores and is definitely playing to win and use his position over me? -
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 41.361% 35.83% 05.53% 905595612 139736352.00 { ATo }
Hand 1: 58.639% 53.11% 05.53% 1342292388 139736352.00 { 55+, A8s+, A8o+ }
This is probably the most accurate range, but makes your shove neutral ev in that case. You can probably add KQo, KQs, QJs, into the mix to make it +ev. I think its tight but its still a fold even if it is very slightly +ev. -
Well that's the thing: is a player like this going to fold KQ here or KJs or QJs or even JTs? I think not. And if he is going to reraise, he is going to reraise small to make it look strong, just like he did twice over a bigstack at the second-to-last table when he had <20BBs:
pokerstars Game #22308969815: Tournament #120443196, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XXIV (8000/16000) - 2008/11/23 20:25:56 ET
Table '120443196 84' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: SixthSenSe19 (776543 in chips)
Seat 2: driverseati (556529 in chips)
Seat 3: TherookieQQ9 (280319 in chips)
Seat 5: Teldar (388754 in chips)
Seat 6: Zpaceman (183613 in chips)
Seat 9: germain133 (800560 in chips)
SixthSenSe19: posts the ante 1600
driverseati: posts the ante 1600
TherookieQQ9: posts the ante 1600
Teldar: posts the ante 1600
Zpaceman: posts the ante 1600
germain133: posts the ante 1600
TherookieQQ9: posts small blind 8000
Teldar: posts big blind 16000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Zpaceman [8s 7s]
Zpaceman: folds
germain133: folds
SixthSenSe19: raises 19289 to 35289
driverseati: folds
TherookieQQ9: raises 90211 to 125500
Teldar: folds
SixthSenSe19: folds
Uncalled bet (90211) returned to TherookieQQ9
TherookieQQ9 collected 96178 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 96178 | Rake 0
Seat 1: SixthSenSe19 folded before Flop
Seat 2: driverseati (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: TherookieQQ9 (small blind) collected (96178)
Seat 5: Teldar (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: Zpaceman folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: germain133 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
PokerStars Game #22309466829: Tournament #120443196, $100+$9 Hold'em No Limit - Level XXV (10000/20000) - 2008/11/23 20:45:11 ET
Table '120443196 84' 9-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: SixthSenSe19 (1686606 in chips)
Seat 3: TherookieQQ9 (383896 in chips)
Seat 5: Teldar (163764 in chips)
Seat 6: Zpaceman (754052 in chips)
Seat 7: Tmay420 (574989 in chips)
SixthSenSe19: posts the ante 2000
TherookieQQ9: posts the ante 2000
Teldar: posts the ante 2000
Zpaceman: posts the ante 2000
Tmay420: posts the ante 2000
Teldar: posts small blind 10000
Zpaceman: posts big blind 20000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Zpaceman [3c Qc]
Tmay420: folds
SixthSenSe19: raises 29158 to 49158
TherookieQQ9: raises 115842 to 165000
Teldar: folds
Zpaceman: folds
Zpaceman said, "thx"
SixthSenSe19: folds
Uncalled bet (115842) returned to TherookieQQ9
TherookieQQ9 collected 138316 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 138316 | Rake 0
Seat 1: SixthSenSe19 folded before Flop
Seat 3: TherookieQQ9 (button) collected (138316)
Seat 5: Teldar (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: Zpaceman (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 7: Tmay420 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
So I think I have +cEV versus his range and, importantly, I don't like having him on my left with a 3-bet stack, so trying to eliminate him is a very important tactic in my attempt to win the tournament (I am playing to win, not move up the money ladder).
If I am bet-folding ATo OTB what should I be bet-calling with? I can't see it is an "easy fold" nor is it an "easy shove", but how much value should I place on potentially eliminating a dangerous opponent versus preserving my stack for better spots (and note that with the stack sizes at the table being fairly short, gaining a big edge in any one hand is unlikely)? -
I'll leave your questoin alone as it has to deal with ranges. What he perceives your raising range to be, what he perceives your raise/calling range to be, and therefore, what his range is are all important factors.
This might make for a good tiebreaker:
TherookieQQ9 is a good player and he's on your left. If you fold, he will still be on your left no matter what. If you call, there's a chance that he will be eliminated. Any time you can remove a really good aggressive player from your immediate left, that's a good thing. So if it is determined that shoving and folding have the same EV, then I'd lean towards shoving. -
i've seen therookie make the smaller 3bet when hes clearly committed, rather than jamming, with the bottom of his range, so that shouldn't bother you..... shove.
-
qft.
Originally Posted by SEABEAST
"he generally makes it less than a full shove even when he has under 20BBs"
kinda feels like you answered your own question here
and if he was "trapping" wouldnt he flat pre or something. i dont see how 3betting any size w. an ~18 BB stack resembles trapping in any way etc ...
regardless, youve seen him making committing non-all in 3bets in the past, A10 in a button/blind dynamic, pretty standard raise/call i would think. -
Having seen the other 2 hands where he 3-bet like 1/2 his stack instead of shoving, I cant see how we can fold this.
You said you were snap-calling if he shoved, you know he does the little 3-bets instead of shoving, so what is the problem? -
if rookie thought youd be folding AT to his resteals when he's obv committed here (so a 3 bet reraise or 3 bet ship is the same thing bc he's never folding to a 4 bet shove with his stack) then he or anyone else would be restealing on your button raises with atc... i really dont see how you could possibly fold this
-
would love to hear what happened here in the end.
would also rather read posts from a good player like zpace than a lot of the other hand analysis that we get in here.










