[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
-
I rarely play more than 2 and preferto play one. I feel like my play does suffer if I play more than one unless I'm playing SNG's where reading the players seems less important then playing the situations or maybe early in MTT's. I dont feel as though I am losing much by playing one table and I enjoy it more.
-
I hated multitabling also at first. But really you dont drop that much in skill by playing 4 instead of 1 once you get use to it. Even if you play %50 worse you still make twice as much 4 tabling.
-
For me it depends on what I am playing. If they are single table sit and goes I don't mind playing a couple of tables at once because the blinds are small and playing isn't that involved, atleast early. But if I am late in Multi-table tourneys and the blinds are creeping up and stealing is key I like to play only 1 or 2 games. I see alot of pros that play a bunch of tables at once but i personally can't do it.
-
I prefer playing one or two at a time only, but like
everything else in poker ...
it depends on the situation. -
I think just about every pro multi-tables, mostly 4 or more. Of course when they're in real big tournaments or deep into tourneys they probably aren't gonna open up more tables.
-
Im definitely no pro but i have to multitable....if i play one table i simply get bored and dont focus on the table anyways, so if have have 4+ tables open i can play them all and not have to worry about losing focus...usually i play 3-5 tables while checking the P5 and CR forums....seems like once you play enough hands the reads become less important(although still important)....but like everyone else if i go deep in a MTT i dont start anymore SNGs and i sitout in the cash games because this requires more focus then early on....
-
only 1 table and i feel when i play more than 1 i lose because of not getting read on how certain players are playing
most of the tourneys and ring games that i win are from just playin 1 table -
Multitabling is the way to go. For instance 1 table = 10bb/100 hands so $100 at one $5/10 table per 100 hands. Suppose that it drops to 7bb/100 hands if you play 3 tables. 3 tables at 7bb/100 hands = $210/100 hands. If you have a winning bb/100 rate that doesn't suffer significantly, you will definitely win more multitabling!
-
I multi table on sitngos and multi table tourneys, but I will only play 1 heads up at a time. I won't play any other games when I'm playing heads up. It takes too much concentration.
cheers
KK -
Holla at me Willis.
-
I prefer to play 2 shortanded games at once so I can play my A game on both tables. Maybe 3 tops if Im feeling frisky. Here's a somewhat related excerpt from the Patrick Antonious interview in CP I found interesting.
"However, the bigger the games, the harder it is to keep them going on a regular basis. Because you are playing against good and highly experienced players, you have to stay in top form at all times. For this reason, I don’t multitable as often as most people do. When I’m in a very big game, I usually restrict myself to just one table, or two tables at most, for the simple reason that in these tough games, most plays you make are based on your opponents rather than on the quality of your cards — so you have to stay 100 percent focused to maintain your edge. Also, because these games are often shorthanded, you don’t have to wait hours for a good hand or situation. Instead, you’ll get involved in loads of hands. Up against top players, it requires lots of concentration to come out on top, mostly by taking advantage of your opponents’ specific tendencies and weaknesses."
link to whole article: http://www.cardplayer.com/cpeurope/a...04&m_id=22










