Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. PLO Double or Nothing

    pokerstars Game #42893598208: Tournament #264510571, $5.00+$0.20 USD Omaha Pot Limit - Level VIII (150/300) - 2010/04/19 11:13:31 MT [2010/04/19 13:13:31 ET]
    Table '264510571 1' 10-max Seat #9 is the button
    Seat 1: garky777 (1180 in chips)
    Seat 2: hell minth (1106 in chips)
    Seat 3: runninbad (1510 in chips)
    Seat 5: news24 (1684 in chips)
    Seat 6: ChatterH (2475 in chips)
    Seat 9: bucman41 (1895 in chips)
    Seat 10: ASE34 (5150 in chips)
    ASE34: posts small blind 150
    garky777: posts big blind 300
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to runninbad [8h 2d Kd Ac]
    hell minth: folds
    runninbad: folds
    news24: folds
    ChatterH: folds
    bucman41: folds
    ASE34: raises 300 to 600
    garky777: calls 300

    *** FLOP *** [Ah 6d 7h]
    ASE34: checks
    garky777: checks
    *** TURN *** [Ah 6d 7h] [9s]
    ASE34: checks
    garky777: checks
    *** RIVER *** [Ah 6d 7h 9s] [8c]
    ASE34: bets 300
    garky777: raises 280 to 580 and is all-in
    ASE34: folds
    Uncalled bet (280) returned to garky777
    garky777 collected 1800 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 1800 | Rake 0
    Board [Ah 6d 7h 9s 8c]
    Seat 1: garky777 (big blind) collected (1800)
    Seat 2: hell minth folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 3: runninbad folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: news24 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 6: ChatterH folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: bucman41 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 10: ASE34 (small blind) folded on the River

    PokerStars Game #42893841886: Tournament #264510571, $5.00+$0.20 USD Omaha Pot Limit - Level IX (200/400) - 2010/04/19 11:18:54 MT [2010/04/19 13:18:54 ET]
    Table '264510571 1' 10-max Seat #1 is the button
    Seat 1: garky777 (530 in chips)
    Seat 2: hell minth (1306 in chips)
    Seat 3: runninbad (1510 in chips)
    Seat 5: news24 (1184 in chips)
    Seat 6: ChatterH (2475 in chips)
    Seat 9: bucman41 (1695 in chips)
    Seat 10: ASE34 (6300 in chips)
    hell minth: posts small blind 200
    runninbad: posts big blind 400
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to runninbad [6d 7s As Kh]
    news24: folds
    ChatterH: folds
    bucman41: folds
    ASE34: calls 400
    garky777: raises 130 to 530 and is all-in
    hell minth: folds
    runninbad: calls 130
    ASE34: calls 130

    *** FLOP *** [Jd 8c Qs]
    runninbad: checks
    ASE34: checks
    *** TURN *** [Jd 8c Qs] [4d]
    runninbad: checks
    ASE34: checks
    *** RIVER *** [Jd 8c Qs 4d] [4s]
    runninbad: checks
    ASE34: folds (LOL)
    *** SHOW DOWN ***
    runninbad: shows [6d 7s As Kh] (a pair of Fours)
    garky777: shows [8h 6c Kc Ah] (two pair, Eights and Fours)
    garky777 collected 1790 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 1790 | Rake 0
    Board [Jd 8c Qs 4d 4s]
    Seat 1: garky777 (button) showed [8h 6c Kc Ah] and won (1790) with two pair, Eights and Fours
    Seat 2: hell minth (small blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 3: runninbad (big blind) showed [6d 7s As Kh] and lost with a pair of Fours
    Seat 5: news24 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 6: ChatterH folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: bucman41 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 10: ASE34 folded on the River

    There was one more hand I witnessed, after I got knocked out and while I was writing support, that also is evidence which adds to the proof. I don't have the hand history but here is the low-down.

    6 players remain Blinds 300-600
    ASE34 (8716 chips)
    garky777 (1790 chips)

    3 players under 1k chips.

    ASE34 Small Blind
    garky777 Big Blind

    Folds around to ASE34 who min raise to 1200
    garky777 moves all-in for 1790
    ASE34 folds

    garky777 now has 2990 and is assured a win.

    One other way the prevent from getting caught: Make sure you mix in some games where your partner is not in them. ASE34's last 18 games have all been with garky777. 15 PLO DoN's, 2 HE SnGs, and 1 5-Card Draw SnG.

    C'mon cheaters, use your heads a little.
  2. People actually cheat in $5 games?
    3 
  3. good thing most of the time bad ethics dont go hand in hand with intelligence
     
  4.  
    Originally Posted by MakeMeMaster View Post

    People actually cheat in $5 games?

    I'm sure they were playing a $5 game to practice their "skills" and one day move up to the higher levels and cost the ballers millions in equity, Therefore, all you HSMTTers can ship to runninbad (Reno) on pokerstars depending on how much you think I saved you.

    Nice job calling your shot BTW, and old MMM avatar > New MMM avatar.
    Thread Starter
  5. just...lol

    :)
  6. Good game stars accounts, people will probably get their mini-ships soon from the money confiscated on collusion here..
  7. I'm sure you're all sitting on the edge of your seats anticipating the outcome of this. So, I thought I would update.

    On Apr 19th I received an email from stars stating a formal investigation had been initiated. No findings have been made yet.

    Since my initial email to Stars, ASE34 has played 5 SnGs (including 2 today) and all of them have been with garky777. Micro-cheaters FTW!
    Thread Starter
  8. Uh, if u were cheating, y would u play HE SNG's?? Am I missing something here?
  9. hmmmm

    i remember this game, i bubbled because of it i beleive
  10. ridiculous
     
  11. nice catch man, good job.
  12. stars pretty much doesn't care about low limit cheating. I emailed them earlier due to a player saying they have to go, so he raised every pot and every bet, then mucked on the river till he busted himself.
    Some fishy things going at stars now.
    Even with the new BS law they still tell you ways to deposit.
    I've just read about the 100 million hands analyzed and the favorite winning 28% of the time.
    And they obviously don't give a shit about cheating.
  13.  
    Originally Posted by 4INSTANT View Post

    stars pretty much doesn't care about low limit cheating. I emailed them earlier due to a player saying they have to go, so he raised every pot and every bet, then mucked on the river till he busted himself.
    Some fishy things going at stars now.
    Even with the new BS law they still tell you ways to deposit.

    What does that have to do with cheating on the site?

     
    Originally Posted by 4INSTANT View Post

    I've just read about the 100 million hands analyzed and the favorite winning 28% of the time.
    And they obviously don't give a shit about cheating.

    Can you link me to where you read about that?
     
  14. http://www.google.com/gwt/x?q=100+mi...ysisReport.pdf

    I think this was posted on p5s last year sometime
    Edited By: phenompoker Jun 6th, 2010 at 12:49 AM
  15.  
    Originally Posted by 4INSTANT View Post

    Stars pretty much doesn't care about low limit cheating. I emailed them earlier due to a player saying they have to go, so he raised every pot and every bet, then mucked on the river till he busted himself.
    Some fishy things going at stars now.
    Even with the new BS law they still tell you ways to deposit.
    I've just read about the 100 million hands analyzed and the favorite winning 28% of the time.
    And they obviously don't give a shit about cheating.

    Fail!

    Hello Christopher,

    First allow me to apologize for the delay in responding to your
    report. This particular case was quite involved and more time
    than usual was required for the review.

    We have concluded that the play of 'garky777' and 'ASE34'
    violated the integrity of our games. They have been informed
    that they are no longer welcome to play on our site. In addition
    they were disqualified from events in which their unfair play
    affected the outcome. Players who advanced as a result have been
    compensated at the expense of the colluders. You advanced to the
    money in T#264510571. Your account has been credited $10.00 to
    reflect your new finish position.

    The integrity of the games at pokerstars is of paramount
    importance to us and we will not abide unfair play in our games.
    We work hard to police our games to assure our players of a fair,
    secure place to play. In the rare cases where collusion has
    actually occurred, we make sure that any players affected are
    compensated appropriately.

    Please accept our thanks for your timely report and continued
    play here on PokerStars. Please do not hesitate to let us know
    any time we can be of help.

    Regards,

    Julio
    PokerStars Support Team
    Thread Starter
  16. That's a good read but I don't see anything in there that says the favorite wins 28% of the time. Can someone point that out to me if it's there?

     
    Originally Posted by runninbad View Post

    Fail!

    Hello Christopher,

    First allow me to apologize for the delay in responding to your
    report. This particular case was quite involved and more time
    than usual was required for the review.

    We have concluded that the play of 'garky777' and 'ASE34'
    violated the integrity of our games. They have been informed
    that they are no longer welcome to play on our site. In addition
    they were disqualified from events in which their unfair play
    affected the outcome. Players who advanced as a result have been
    compensated at the expense of the colluders. You advanced to the
    money in T#264510571. Your account has been credited $10.00 to
    reflect your new finish position.

    The integrity of the games at pokerstars is of paramount
    importance to us and we will not abide unfair play in our games.
    We work hard to police our games to assure our players of a fair,
    secure place to play. In the rare cases where collusion has
    actually occurred, we make sure that any players affected are
    compensated appropriately.

    Please accept our thanks for your timely report and continued
    play here on PokerStars. Please do not hesitate to let us know
    any time we can be of help.

    Regards,

    Julio
    PokerStars Support Team

    Nice, glad to see they made things right. Stars pretty much always does...
     
  17. Nice! Glad ps followed through.
  18.  
    Originally Posted by 4INSTANT View Post

    stars pretty much doesn't care about low limit cheating.

    LOL...really? I get emails every few weeks from Stars refunding me money in SGs I was in where they found collusion. And I play $3-$12 SGs. Pretty sure they still care about collusion and cheating at any level.
  19.  
    Originally Posted by N 82 50 24

    That's a good read but I don't see anything in there that says the favorite wins 28% of the time. Can someone point that out to me if it's there?

    I think that his misunderstanding came right from the first paragraph:
     

    Cigital examined 103 million hands of Texas Hold’Em poker played
    at pokerstars. In the majority of cases, 75.7% of the time, the game’s
    outcome is determined with no player seeing more than his/her
    own cards and some or all of the community cards. In these games
    all players fold to a single remaining player who wins the pot. In
    the 24.3% of cases that see a showdown (where cards are revealed
    to determine a winner), only 50.3% of showdowns are won by the
    player who could make the best 5-card hand. The other roughly
    half of the showdowns are won by someone with an inferior 5-card
    hand because the player with the best 5-card hand folded prior to
    showdown.

    What it actually says (4INSTANT) is that out of those hundred million, 75% didn't see a flop, and then out of the remaining 24 million (24.3%), half of those were won by the (eventually) best preflop hand, (not the preflop favorite, but the holding that would have made a better five card hand than the rest of the table, whether it was AA or 62o). In the other half the best hand folded sometime before showdown (and usually ended up screaming at the monitor "damn, i should have played my 83s, i would have had a flush").

    Obviously another case of reading comprehension gone bad. (Caveat: I also only read the first paragraph, so I may be full of shiite too)
    Edited By: DSKekaha Jun 6th, 2010 at 07:43 AM
    Reason: Fixed the quotes

Similar Threads