Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. Haven't been on here forever. This is one of the most unique MTT spots I just got in, so weird wanna know the math and what you think. I know in STT there are correct spots to fold AA, but is this another spot where you fold a monster.

    $5/2R1A Top 135 money. Bubble play hand-for-hand. When hand started literally one more elimination till the money. I was like bottom 3 in chips before hand started. Midway in my hand someone bust at another table. Still reads 136 in lobby with smallest stack being 0. So if I fold I cash for sure. My immediate right opens 2.5x vs my less than 5x so obv I'm all in if I choose. I don't know if I lose this hand if I finish 136 or not because of starting chips.

    So this is somewhat of a technicality question as well as pure math equity question. Any ICM-ers out there? Don't ask how I got that low in chips, because its not pretty and its not what I am wondering.

    pokerstars Game #47593061653: Tournament #323010977, $5.00+$0.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XX (700/1400) - 2010/08/02 0:07:27 ET
    Table '323010977 23' 9-max Seat #7 is the button
    Seat 1: buitbeat (14897 in chips)
    Seat 2: chawins (13661 in chips)
    Seat 3: Croustille (48016 in chips)
    Seat 4: MJstud (17300 in chips)
    Seat 5: pitbulz (25463 in chips)
    Seat 6: meDiOCREiAM (6784 in chips)
    Seat 7: fatnines (87284 in chips)
    Seat 8: bubbleoutcas (133675 in chips)
    Seat 9: JoshuaVok3 (23689 in chips)
    buitbeat: posts the ante 175
    chawins: posts the ante 175
    Croustille: posts the ante 175
    MJstud: posts the ante 175
    pitbulz: posts the ante 175
    meDiOCREiAM: posts the ante 175
    fatnines: posts the ante 175
    bubbleoutcas: posts the ante 175
    JoshuaVok3: posts the ante 175
    bubbleoutcas: posts small blind 700
    JoshuaVok3: posts big blind 1400
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to meDiOCREiAM [Kh Ac]
    buitbeat: folds
    chawins: folds
    Croustille: folds
    MJstud: folds
    pitbulz: raises 2100 to 3500
    meDiOCREiAM said, "i really dont know what to do"
    .........................

    Thanks
  2. I don't think this is a unique weird situation just stick it in you can never ever fold here.
  3. is this real?
  4. no it's not
     
  5. [ ] Unique
    [ ] Really
    [ ] Weird
    [x] situation
  6.  
    Originally Posted by Steve Murkle View Post

    [ ] Unique
    [ ] Really
    [ ] Weird
    [x] situation

    True that. I just like ridic bolding obv. My answer is never, but maybe if your around the bubble and really need to cash in the tournament to buy food or something.
    But in all seriousness how does the software work and can this be translated by ICM, its just interesting to me (like folding AA pre in certain Sattys) since I'm fairly new to MTT.
    Thread Starter
  7. If you're considering a fold to minimum cash rather than taking a great spot to more than double up and actually have a chance at winning more money, you should probably quit poker.... or search for my screen names and come play.

    The only reason it's a unique situation is that you are scared money. If you're rolled properly for the tournament you're in, you should windmill-slam snap high five your monitor and ship it in. If you're afraid that you might bubble even though it's a tremendously +ev spot, you should probably step down in lower buyins until you aren't afraid to make the right decision and would rather fold to profit like 3 dollars instead of playing, correctly, to win.

    Never. Ever. Fold.
  8. I don't fold, but I'm sure it's closer then everyone is making it out to be.
     
  9.  
    Originally Posted by zander View Post

    If you're considering a fold to minimum cash rather than taking a great spot to more than double up and actually have a chance at winning more money, you should probably quit poker.... or search for my screen names and come play.

    The only reason it's a unique situation is that you are scared money. If you're rolled properly for the tournament you're in, you should windmill-slam snap high five your monitor and ship it in. If you're afraid that you might bubble even though it's a tremendously +ev spot, you should probably step down in lower buyins until you aren't afraid to make the right decision and would rather fold to profit like 3 dollars instead of playing, correctly, to win.

    Never. Ever. Fold.

    +1 million ... you are playing for first place correct? who gives a shit on the mincash you fold this on the reg that's the best ur gonna hope for is the mincash epidemic
  10. fold.
  11. OMG obv its never a fold! +1 million here too. I think rivverkiller is the only one who sees what I mean, by playing with the idea possibly pure math be closer than snap calling. Its not a question of correct play, bankroll management, tourney strategy, or scared money cuz everyone should know that.

    Folding is wrong, play with good bankroll, always go for top spots since its weighted and win not min cash, no scared money if good bankroll.

    Just wondering equity and what does software do there for pure curiosity, because its really never application. Rereading my original post it sounds really retarded I see that now.
    Thread Starter
  12. Buy Bubble insurance, its cheap and allows you to shove.
  13. The only reason AA can be a fold in a satellite is because of the payment structure, i.e. there is only =1st or nothing. I highly doubt whether ICM would make this a fold, and even it did, you still shouldnt.
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by CJDeman View Post

    The only reason AA can be a fold in a satellite is because of the payment structure, i.e. there is only =1st or nothing. I highly doubt whether ICM would make this a fold, and even it did, you still shouldnt.

    This is obv not one of those situations, but if you are playing poker basing your decisions soley on making the most long term money, than there are times in normal mtt's where it is correct to fold AA preflop, though extremely rare.

    EDIT** I also hate this mentality in advice where everyone says "you have to call if you are playing to win". This isn't a good mentality to take to approach poker if you are trying to grind a living in poker. There are definitely situations that are +cEV but -$EV and situations that are -cEV but +$EV. Lumping every bit of advice into you must do X to play for a win is ridiculous. I play to try to make the most longterm $$ with my decisions. Most of the time the decisions are in line with playing for the win because that is where most of the money is in tournaments. But sometimes it makes more sense to take a -cEV situation (which ultimately reduces your chance of winning the tournament) to increase your overall $$ expectation.
    Edited By: qjuice14 Aug 2nd, 2010 at 07:36 AM
     
  15. A mincash is worth $23.58 and you have ~2/3rds of a starting stack (we'll call a starting stack 10k if you got in for $20.50).

    It's way closer than everyone is making it out to be. Let's put it this way -- if you had 4,000 chips I'm positive it's a fold. You bust 35-40% of the time here. Cashing becomes much more important as your stack gets shorter.

    If you are never factoring in the value of a mincash, you are bleeding money. I make folds every week when close to the $ that are influenced by the value of a mincash.
  16.  
    Originally Posted by rfohrenbach View Post

    A mincash is worth $23.58 and you have ~2/3rds of a starting stack (we'll call a starting stack 10k if you got in for $20.50).

    It's way closer than everyone is making it out to be. Let's put it this way -- if you had 4,000 chips I'm positive it's a fold. You bust 35-40% of the time here. Cashing becomes much more important as your stack gets shorter.

    If you are never factoring in the value of a mincash, you are bleeding money. I make folds every week when close to the $ that are influenced by the value of a mincash.

    But the choice here is not between min-cash and busting. If he busts 40% of the time here, then he only needs his equity in the tournament to be $39.30 ($39.30 x 60% = $23.58) for the decision to be EV neutral. I cant do that calculation, but I cant believe he wouldnt have that equity with 13BBs in the money,
     
  17. yah it is interesting but you shouldn't be playing to min-cash a double up and a blind steal later and you got a workable stack again.
    if you had like 1 bb or less I think people would be saying differently.
  18. even if he calls and wins its not like it puts him in a great spot to win alot of money. this does seem like a wierd situation especially considering some1 just busted and u know ur in no matter what as long as u fold. what does calling and winning really do for him anyway?? hes still gonna have around 10 bb's and good chance he's not gonna do much better than min cash anyway. i never folded in that spot in my life and ive blown 100k stacks w/ AK (or worse) two off the money like a mule plenty of times but thats my point. doubling 100k could possibly propell u to the FT. doubling 6k at 700/1400 doesnt do anything for u whatsoever. i could still never fold tho just seems more borderline as its broken down. i think my head just exploded :(
     
  19. ^^^

    yeah idk sure he's not a lock if he doubles but honestly when are you ever a lock when you get to the final 100 or so people.
    just play your game best you can and hope you get there.