+ Reply to Thread
  1. #1
    Icon

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    494
    After having had runs of both ridiculously good and bad luck lately, as well as SCTrojans numerous comments about a lifetime not being a big enough sample size, I got to thinking about how much variance really does impact profit in MTT poker.

    So I looked through some stats and figured that your average good player makes it ITM about 15% of the time. Then I made the following crude assumptions:

    *A good player is twice as likely to final table as an average player.
    *A good player is twice as likely to finish in places 1-3 as they are 7-9

    Then I ran it assuming 100 of these "good players" each played the FTP 50-50 (including rake) -

    100 times:
    Worst Profit/tourn = -$48 Best = $248

    500 times:
    Worst Profit/tourn = -$14 Best = $124

    1000 times:
    Worst Profit/tourn = -$21 Best = $115

    5000 times:
    Worst Profit/tourn = $21 Best = $64

    100000 times:
    Worst Profit/tourn = $36 Best = $46

    1000000 times:
    Worst Profit/tourn = $39 Best = $43

    10000000 times:
    Worst Profit/tourn = $40 Best = $41

    Basically...variance between two players of the exact same "skill level" is huge even over 5000 tournaments. Also, this shows that a player who is roughly 80% ROI over infinite MTTs can actually run at -42% ROI over 1000 tourns. This is definitely worth thinking about before you call someone out over their stats when you have a sample size of two or three hundred tourns.

    Also, along the way with this simulation, the worst streak of not cashing was at 79. This is also worth thinking about next time you think you're having an impossibly bad run, and it also fits in with most theories about conservative big-field MTT bankroll management.

  2. #2
    Icon
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    City
    Deal
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,527
    Nice post, variance is a bitch.

  3. #3
    Icon
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    City
    Austin, TX
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    4,832
    Blogs
    2
    Post more. This should be in the 99 thread too...

  4. #4
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    City
    Surrey
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    3,547
    can you explain this to me? i dont get it
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  5. #5
    Icon
    Moderator / Poker Coach
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    City
    Niagara Falls, NY
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    10,012
    Blogs
    4
    Post more.
    • Moderator
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  6. #6
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    City
    Henderson, NV
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,081
    Nice post.

    It constantly amazes me how alot of people don't see how much variance there really is in tournaments.

    In an extreme case there could be a player who is one of the best in the world that will never get his break because he simply loses most of his key flips/etc late. Variance is THAT powerful in tourneys.

    And I agree that a lifetime is not near a large enough sample size to balance out all the variance in tourney poker. Here's a thought....that no matter how good you are, its mathematically possible that you may never win another big field tournament in your lifetime simply due to variance.
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  7. #7
    Icon

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    City
    Greensboro, NC
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    971
    really really cool post

  8. #8
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    City
    Surrey
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    3,547
    Quote Originally Posted by spectrefax View Post
    Nice post.

    It constantly amazes me how alot of people don't see how much variance there really is in tournaments.

    In an extreme case there could be a player who is one of the best in the world that will never get his break because he simply loses most of his key flips/etc late. Variance is THAT powerful in tourneys.

    And I agree that a lifetime is not near a large enough sample size to balance out all the variance in tourney poker. Here's a thought....that no matter how good you are, its mathematically possible that you may never win another big field tournament in your lifetime simply due to variance.
    yep, i actually blogged about this yesterday. almost every successful player at any level has a friend who they consider to be very talented who just can't seem to break through in tournaments for whatever reason. some people play great and also run way above expectation and are considered amazing players, which they are. while maybe another player plays even better, but can't overcome their own shitty luck. or others who play stupid, and run great for a short time.

    many players end up quitting poker because of their lack of success in mtts. they just assume they stink because they've never had a big score. sure, some players actually do stink, but some do not, and just run bad enough for a long enough time that they theyre not good enough.
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  9. #9
    Icon

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    City
    Charlotte, NC
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    757
    I feel like the two assumptions about good players may be a little liberal as well, so the variance gap is probably even wider then speculated here.

    Bottom line: Run good.

  10. #10
    Icon

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    City
    College Station, TX
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    3,485
    some intelligent players really cant even fathom the true meaning of variance pertaining to tourneys and luck, situational luck, etc. etc. and some dont believe in luck and think it all evens out for everyone lol (generally because they are a product of positive variance and delusional about their own game, obv different degrees for some opposed to others (vietcong being on the extreme end of one spectrum))

    ok, better stop before the valium rambles more

  11. #11
    Icon
    cool starry bra
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    City
    Henderson, NV
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    28,661
    Quote Originally Posted by m_hawk_1 View Post
    Also, this shows that a player who is roughly 80% ROI over infinite MTTs can actually run at -42% ROI over 1000 tourns.
    this sounds exactly like my last year or so...

    the last 6 months especially have made me realize just how fucking brutal variance is...

    have to admit at this time last year there is no fkn way I would have thought I could lose for this long...

  12. #12
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    City
    Surrey
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    3,547
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWacoKidd View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by m_hawk_1 View Post
    Also, this shows that a player who is roughly 80% ROI over infinite MTTs can actually run at -42% ROI over 1000 tourns.
    this sounds exactly like my last year or so...

    the last 6 months especially have made me realize just how fucking brutal variance is...

    have to admit at this time last year there is no fkn way I would have thought I could lose for this long...
    sounds like a lot of people i know
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  13. #13
    Icon

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    City
    Cambridge, MA
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    2,704
    Quote Originally Posted by Jennifear View Post
    Post more.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    Agreed.

    I tried to replicate what you did (I'm bored) and once I got started I realized you probably made about another 10 assumptions or decicsions in order to do the analysis. As posted there is no way to validate your result (which might be dead on 100%, but it might not.) The crux of any good analysis like this is in the assumptions anway so please fill in the details!
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  14. #14
    Icon

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    City
    Plano, TX
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    16,306
    Quote Originally Posted by TheWacoKidd View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by m_hawk_1 View Post
    Also, this shows that a player who is roughly 80% ROI over infinite MTTs can actually run at -42% ROI over 1000 tourns.
    this sounds exactly like my last year or so...

    the last 6 months especially have made me realize just how fucking brutal variance is...

    have to admit at this time last year there is no fkn way I would have thought I could lose for this long...
    not to be a dick because it sucks for you right now... but you have had the good side of variance in how well you ran last year... and whether you ran exceptionally well or not, you were able to get huge scores from good play and running decent, which net net pays you a lot more than someone who runs average over the same period. Emotionally though, it sucks to get paid it all up front and then go through a downswing.
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  15. #15
    Icon

    Join Date
    May 2007
    City
    Fort Myers, FL
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    4,969
    Blogs
    1
    Damn all my assumptions of me actually being a sick player and just being the most unluckiest player in the world have all come true. I knew I was on to something maybe now everyone will believe me, that my poker career just STARTED with the awfull side of variance.

  16. #16
    Icon

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    City
    Paris
    Country
    France
    Posts
    314
    Not sure about online tournies since you can play way many, but I had a friend who ran real bad in cash games online at some point, and over the sample he had, he was 30/70 in equity (whenever he was allin, he ran 20% worst then he should have) and he told me his sample was big enough to compare to a lifetime of tournies, so basically you could play a big event almost every week of your life and not play enough hands to eventually come even close to breaking even luck wise. Kind of scary.
    • Total Cashes over $500k

  17. #17
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    City
    Henderson, NV
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,081
    Well naturally you can go even deeper with this topic and base your play style around it.

    If you make the assumption that variance being the beast that it is you could play insanely loose aggressive and unorthodox in order to try and make most of your pots winable w/o showdown. Doing this however becomes problematic as playing this way in an attempt to reduce variance may actually increase your variance depending on the players your playing against.

    Bottom line is that the only sure way to win a pot is to win w/o showing your cards at the end.

    I really like this topic though as its something I've went over in my head countless times. I've been at several final tables where first place is getting a handsome 50K-100K and never ran well enough to take it down.
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  18. #18
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Country
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,822
    my average tourney size is a lot smaller than this, as are a lot of people, would be very keen to see some results for 500 and 200 people average field sizes.

    maybe a table would work well?

    great post, btw

  19. #19
    Icon

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    City
    Minneapolis, MN
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    679
    i once went 0/65 on full tilt mtt cashes...... i kept reviewing hand histories etc.... seeing what was off on my game, but i felt confident that i was playing solid. I guess it just shows how brutal variance can be at times.

    Eventually the cold streak snapped and began cashing normal again, but def brings home the point of proper br management. I generally play way under my bankroll in most situations, which has allowed me to overcome some nasty downswings in mtt's.
    • Total Cashes over $1 million

  20. #20
    Icon

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Country
    Bosnia and Herzegovina
    Posts
    5,581
    I am experiencing this redic variance on ftp atm.

  21. #21
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    City
    Sydney
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    653
    Blogs
    3
    Very interesting post. I would be interested to see what the results would be look for an average and bad player too.....lets face, unless we are that delusional, we are not ALL top players :)

    SNGs FTW!
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  22. #22
    Icon

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    City
    Alto, MI
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    1,200
    Quote Originally Posted by spectrefax View Post

    It constantly amazes me how alot of people don't see how much variance there really is in tournaments.
    Or the people who refuse to accept the reality of variance.

  23. #23
    Icon

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    City
    Strathroy
    Country
    Canada
    Posts
    1,350
    not to be a dick because it sucks for you right now... but you have had the good side of variance in how well you ran last year... and whether you ran exceptionally well or not, you were able to get huge scores from good play and running decent, which net net pays you a lot more than someone who runs average over the same period. Emotionally though, it sucks to get paid it all up front and then go through a downswing.

    Resilient, Guys like Waco, apestyles, Busto, Stevie do make big scores, but remember the size of buying and how many MTT'S they play per day.

    They play smaller more skilled fields so a score of say 20k for first in any given event could easily be eaten up in a weekend or 2 with a run of bad cards IMO imagine 4 months and no cashes (not that i know you and that you do not do this aswell. It's just a general observation.)

    I say this from watching doubledave's day in the life of a midstake grinder, the buyins at his level totalled a 1/2 months salary for me.

    Imagine playing the biggest mtt's every day at the higest skill level for the most amount of money you can and hitting a 3-6 month sebatical from cashing.

    I certainly have the utmost respect for the amount of stress these guys put on themselves and thier bankrolls and still come out on top. I can barely handle my smallish stakes and the bad beats i take and the swings i take on my miniscule bankroll.

    Good post OP.

    Post More.

  24. #24
    Icon

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    494
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by CJDeman View Post
    Very interesting post. I would be interested to see what the results would be look for an average and bad player too.....lets face, unless we are that delusional, we are not ALL top players :)

    SNGs FTW!
    ok. I've reworked the "profile" of the sample player. My assumptions are now that the player cashes 20% of the time, but is half as likely as the "good" player from before to final table, and then once at the final table, is twice as likely to bust out 7-9 rather than 1-3.

    This player profile creates a player that runs at about -8% ROI after rake over infinite tournaments.

    Over a sample of 100 players playing 1000 tourns:

    Worst: -$23/tourn Best: $30/tourn

    Over this sample of 1000 tournaments - the "luckiest" player actually won the tournament 3 times. It's pretty clear that it is this possibility that keeps losing players in the game. So next time you see someone luckbox their way to a big win, keep in mind that this luck factor is probably what keeps the poker economy alive.

    Over a sample of 10,000 tourns:

    Worst: -$13/tourn Best: $6.6/tourn

    So basically, over 10,000 tourns, it's statistically possible for a long-term losing player to run at a 13% ROI, and probably have a decent P5s PLB score and a great OPR ranking.

    Over 50,000 tourns:

    Worst: -$7/tourn Best: -$0.20 a tourn.

    While there's still a big gap between the unluckiest and the luckiest players after 50,000 tourns, this is seems to be the point where even the luckiest -8% ROI player will almost certainly lose money.

  25. #25
    Icon
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    City
    Deal
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,527
    Quote Originally Posted by m_hawk_1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CJDeman View Post
    Very interesting post. I would be interested to see what the results would be look for an average and bad player too.....lets face, unless we are that delusional, we are not ALL top players :)

    SNGs FTW!
    ok. I've reworked the "profile" of the sample player. My assumptions are now that the player cashes 20% of the time, but is half as likely as the "good" player from before to final table, and then once at the final table, is twice as likely to bust out 7-9 rather than 1-3.

    This player profile creates a player that runs at about -8% ROI after rake over infinite tournaments.

    Over a sample of 100 players playing 1000 tourns:

    Worst: -$23/tourn Best: $30/tourn

    Over this sample of 1000 tournaments - the "luckiest" player actually won the tournament 3 times. It's pretty clear that it is this possibility that keeps losing players in the game. So next time you see someone luckbox their way to a big win, keep in mind that this luck factor is probably what keeps the poker economy alive.

    Over a sample of 10,000 tourns:

    Worst: -$13/tourn Best: $6.6/tourn

    So basically, over 10,000 tourns, it's statistically possible for a long-term losing player to run at a 13% ROI, and probably have a decent P5s PLB score and a great OPR ranking.

    Over 50,000 tourns:

    Worst: -$7/tourn Best: -$0.20 a tourn.

    While there's still a big gap between the unluckiest and the luckiest players after 50,000 tourns, this is seems to be the point where even the luckiest -8% ROI player will almost certainly lose money.
    This is only for a sample of 100 players though, correct? If you expand that to 1000 or 10000 players you would no doubt see someone win money over 50k tournaments who was a losing player.

  26. #26
    Icon

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    494
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post
    This is only for a sample of 100 players though, correct? If you expand that to 1000 or 10000 players you would no doubt see someone win money over 50k tournaments who was a losing player.
    If I run it for 1000 players I get 1 player with an avg profit per tourn of $1.16.

    10000 players I get a player running at $1.65.

    So yeah, once you factor in how many players are playing online poker...there are bound to be some serious statistical outliers in real life tournaments.

  27. #27
    Icon

    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    City
    Plano, TX
    Country
    United States
    Posts
    16,306
    my only point, and using Waco's results as an example, is that MTT results variance is associated wth a fairly normal distibution (and this has nothing to do with the very good skills of players with results).

    "Variance" as commonly referred to here = negative variance.

    "Running like God" = positive variance.

    Someone who experiences a lot of positive variance, whether it is running like God or even just running decently at key times - combined with a period of large negative variance - will make a lot more money than someone who runs average (average ups and downs over the same period). Obviously, high volumes of MTTs will smooth that, and how many it takes is the point of the OP.

    I'm not tryng to all diminish the results or skills of Waco or any winning player, but rather to point out that statistical variance encompasses the positive results as well as the negative.
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  28. #28
    Icon

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Country
    New Zealand
    Posts
    612
    This is really interesting. Is there some user friendly program to do these variance calculations? free download?
    • Total Cashes over $100k

  29. #29
    Icon

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Country
    Australia
    Posts
    494
    Thread Starter
    Quote Originally Posted by Faecal Matter View Post
    This is really interesting. Is there some user friendly program to do these variance calculations? free download?
    Not that I know of. I just wrote up a quick program without a real user interface to see how the numbers worked out and to satisfy my own curiosity.

  30. #30
    Icon
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    City
    Deal
    Country
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,527
    Quote Originally Posted by Faecal Matter View Post
    This is really interesting. Is there some user friendly program to do these variance calculations? free download?
    RVG's ROI simulator

    ^^This is technically for sngs I think but can be used for mtts just the same.

+ Reply to Thread
Hide
NewPM
Forum Jump Subscriptions Search