Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. I was not involved... but what a weird hands...

    pokerstars Game #26761118253: Tournament #200904082, $300+$20 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (25/50) - 2009/04/05 22:31:31 CET [2009/04/05 16:31:31 ET]
    Table '200904082 143' 9-max Seat #5 is the button
    Seat 1: tpir90036 (10000 in chips)
    Seat 4: hdezpoker (10050 in chips)
    Seat 5: beeschnuts (9988 in chips)
    Seat 6: redhookesb (9950 in chips)
    Seat 7: POTTERPOKER (10000 in chips)
    Seat 8: polpolpol (10000 in chips)
    Seat 9: baletta (10012 in chips)
    redhookesb: posts small blind 25
    POTTERPOKER: posts big blind 50
    *** HOLE CARDS ***
    Dealt to polpolpol [9h Kd]
    polpolpol: folds
    baletta: raises 100 to 150
    tpir90036: folds
    hdezpoker: folds
    beeschnuts: folds
    redhookesb: folds
    POTTERPOKER: calls 100
    *** FLOP *** [Ts Qd 9d]
    POTTERPOKER: checks
    baletta: bets 250
    POTTERPOKER: raises 550 to 800
    baletta: calls 550
    *** TURN *** [Ts Qd 9d] [Td]
    POTTERPOKER: checks
    baletta: checks
    *** RIVER *** [Ts Qd 9d Td] [Qc]
    POTTERPOKER: bets 9050 and is all-in
    baletta: folds
    Uncalled bet (9050) returned to POTTERPOKER
    POTTERPOKER collected 1925 from pot
    *** SUMMARY ***
    Total pot 1925 | Rake 0
    Board [Ts Qd 9d Td Qc]
    Seat 1: tpir90036 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 4: hdezpoker folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 5: beeschnuts (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 6: redhookesb (small blind) folded before Flop
    Seat 7: POTTERPOKER (big blind) collected (1925)
    Seat 8: polpolpol folded before Flop (didn't bet)
    Seat 9: baletta folded on the River

    Potter OBV can beat a Queen. What would you do if you are balletta and have TT, for quad tens!

    can you really fold quads?

    Can you really beat anything but a stupid improbable bluff?
     
  2. Well potterpoker is obviously hoping that baletta has a hand and will call his shove (since he has a 50% ROI in 1450 MTT's he knows what he's doing and is not trying to steal this pot with an idiotic shove on the river). I don't think he would shove a Q here because he'd want value for his Q vs a T, same with QQ probably. Maybe he has the KJ of diamonds, I dno. Interesting spot hmmm.
  3. Pretty sure I'm calling with quad 10s..., only hands that beat him are J8dd and QQ cause cypriot has Kd in his hand
     
  4. ugh! ignore my hand...

    but yeah , the shover obv has more than a Q 99% of the time...

    so quad tens... are in essence a bluff catcher...

    can anyone find a fold , not in theory, but in real time in the game?
     
    Thread Starter
  5. i never ever fold TT there... maybe im bad, maybe its just i dont like folding quads
  6. I didnt think it was possible to fold quads on a board w/o trips on it
  7. obv never folding tt. misclicks happen and people play bad.
  8.  
    Originally Posted by Crazy Cypriot View Post

    but yeah , the shover obv has more than a Q 99% of the time...

    This seems high.....really interested to hear more about why you think this...
     
  9.  
    Originally Posted by Crazy Cypriot View Post

    but yeah , the shover obv has more than a Q 99% of the time...

    I'd prob quit poker if i folded quad 10's on that board in a 300 donkament
     
  10.  
    Originally Posted by DEEZZZ_NUTS View Post

    I'd prob quit poker if i folded quad 10's on that board in a 300 donkament

    Gags30 is an instructor at PocketFives Training . To get more of his advice and to watch his training videos, click here.

  11. lol at ever folding quads
     1
  12. i hope poker is still profitable when folding quads becomes standard/ez fold. cant wait!
     
  13. ugh...

    i am not trying to say that folding quads is correct. i have trouble folding junk hands, not quads:)

    however, given that the shover is a player with over 1000 tourneys, and a positive good ROI at a mid to high level, i cannot see him doing this with a single Queen.

    This move seems like, no one can ever fold a full house, so i push for value...

    i am not saying in this specific situation, for this specific tournament, but can anyone actually fold TT there? , in a different tournament or whatever

    the fact is that from his pokerdb we can see that the shover is NOT a donk... i dunno.. it just got me thinking and i think even though we d snap call with TT, its a hand that deservers extra thought
     
    Thread Starter
  14. If you're folding quads to my river shove here, i'm shoving ATC. GL sir.
     
  15.  
    Originally Posted by Frank1The1Tank View Post

    If you're folding quads to my river shove here, i'm shoving ATC. GL sir.

    No you're not. And we know you're not. TT would be the sickest laydown of all-time; I would timebank then call, but I can see an argument for folding here. I am folding a Q though.

    EDIT: I am 99% sure villain has J8DD or TT here.
  16. ^^^ that was my point...

    if villain is a thinking opponent, thinking at a good level, and not 4839048933890 levels above us... those are the only cards he could have
     
    Thread Starter
  17. this isnt funny.
     
  18. This thread is a joke.

    It's one long level.

    I almost see a case for folding a Q, almost. Potter played it like he has a Q though. CRAI the flop, check the turn, shove river? I mean he might have a straight flush, but give me a break, did anyone OPR the opponent he shoves into? Maybe he's a big loser and potter tried to get paid with a Q vs a 10 or AA or something. As far as I'm concerned I'm SNAP CALLING 1010, and I'm probably never folding a Q on the river either.
  19. If villain is a thinking opponent thinking at a good level, what possible reason would he have to jam river instead of check raising with quads+.
  20. I don't see how you can say this:

     
    Originally Posted by Crazy Cypriot View Post

    but yeah , the shover obv has more than a Q 99% of the time...

    and this:

     
    Originally Posted by Crazy Cypriot View Post


    i think even though we d snap call with TT, its a hand that deservers extra thought

    in the same thread.
     
  21.  
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

    If villain is a thinking opponent thinking at a good level, what possible reason would he have to jam river instead of check raising with quads+.

    He could c/r, but I think he is shoving here because he crushes a Q and knows a random with a Q won't fold.

    Are you calling with a Q here Stevie? I'm not.
  22.  
    Originally Posted by Pghfan987 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

    If villain is a thinking opponent thinking at a good level, what possible reason would he have to jam river instead of check raising with quads+.

    He could c/r, but I think he is shoving here because he crushes a Q and knows a random with a Q won't fold.

    Are you calling with a Q here Stevie? I'm not.

    A random with a Q is never checking behind so check shoving has to be better than open shoving unless the random with a Q will fold to the checkshove but call the 9x pot open jam which makes no sense because the c/r looks more like a bluff.
  23.  
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Pghfan987 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

    If villain is a thinking opponent thinking at a good level, what possible reason would he have to jam river instead of check raising with quads+.

    He could c/r, but I think he is shoving here because he crushes a Q and knows a random with a Q won't fold.

    Are you calling with a Q here Stevie? I'm not.

    A random with a Q is never checking behind so check shoving has to be better than open shoving unless the random with a Q will fold to the checkshove but call the 9x pot open jam which makes no sense because the c/r looks more like a bluff.

    Stevie is obv dead on (not like I needed to verify this). Another reason c/r rather than straight shipping is better is it gives the preflop rasier a chance to stab w/ a missed draw (i.e. AJ).
     1
  24.  
    Originally Posted by shanetrain22 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Pghfan987 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

    If villain is a thinking opponent thinking at a good level, what possible reason would he have to jam river instead of check raising with quads+.

    He could c/r, but I think he is shoving here because he crushes a Q and knows a random with a Q won't fold.

    Are you calling with a Q here Stevie? I'm not.

    A random with a Q is never checking behind so check shoving has to be better than open shoving unless the random with a Q will fold to the checkshove but call the 9x pot open jam which makes no sense because the c/r looks more like a bluff.

    Stevie is obv dead on (not like I needed to verify this). Another reason c/r rather than straight shipping is better is it gives the preflop rasier a chance to stab w/ a missed draw (i.e. AJ).

    With all due respect, I think Stevie is thinking of the optimal play and not what actually transpired. Maybe he should have check shoved, but he didn't, but he still beats a single Q. What do you put him on???
  25.  
    Originally Posted by Pghfan987 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by shanetrain22 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by Pghfan987 View Post

     
    Originally Posted by stevie444 View Post

    If villain is a thinking opponent thinking at a good level, what possible reason would he have to jam river instead of check raising with quads+.

    He could c/r, but I think he is shoving here because he crushes a Q and knows a random with a Q won't fold.

    Are you calling with a Q here Stevie? I'm not.

    A random with a Q is never checking behind so check shoving has to be better than open shoving unless the random with a Q will fold to the checkshove but call the 9x pot open jam which makes no sense because the c/r looks more like a bluff.

    Stevie is obv dead on (not like I needed to verify this). Another reason c/r rather than straight shipping is better is it gives the preflop rasier a chance to stab w/ a missed draw (i.e. AJ).

    With all due respect, I think Stevie is thinking of the optimal play and not what actually transpired. Maybe he should have check shoved, but he didn't, but he still beats a single Q. What do you put him on???

    I only mentioned that because it was said that if villain was a good high level thinking player the only hands he could have would be TT or J8dd which doesnt make sense because shoving those hands is clearly infinite worse than check shoving and a good high level thinking player would realise that. I think theres a very decent chance the guy just has a Q and wants to get called by a ten and like I said before, misclicks happen - def cant rule out the chance he tried to make it 1200 and actually made it 12000 and ended up shoving.
  26. You guys may be on a different level than me but I don't think you can rule out shoving a Q trying to make it look weak and inducing a call from a T or just shoving hoping to get another Q to fold and take the 2K in the pot. J8dd and TT are definitely in his range but not the only 2 hands in it.
  27. Its def an interesting hand, its too hard to analyze because there are too many variables, if its bax vs annette, i think it would be easier to analyze. Pretty much i agree with most here, prolly shover has a q, and just hopin for misclick, or take down the pot, pushing another q out, etc.
     
  28. It is of course possible that this guy has just a Q, but I don't think it is likely. I think he value bets the Q hoping to get called by a T. As I have said several times, I don't think he expects his opponent to fold a Q, so jamming to unchop a split pot would be futile. I think he is trying to get maximum value out of his J8DD or TT.

    EDIT: I suppose it could be a misclick when he tried to value bet his Q, but given the info I still thinks this is a value shove with a monster on a board where his opponent could easily have a full house.
  29. looks like potterpoker has TT to me, which makes it very tough to answer the question in the OP.
     
  30. i also think he has TT most of the time... or a straight flush
     
    Thread Starter

Similar Threads