Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

WCOOP "high roller" event structure

Reply to Thread
  1. DuckU DuckU is offline

    Anchorage, AK
    United States

    Posts: 18
    Joined: Apr 07

    Aug 14th, 2010 (8/14/2010 3:47am)

    I took a look at some of the WCOOP tourney structures and saw that the $10K "high roller" event doesn't have the best structure out of all the NL events, and it's the biggest buy in. It has the same structure as the sunday $200 buy in events (5) throughout the series and a worse structure than the $500, $1K and $5K buy in NL events on sundays. It also appears to be worse than the $1K NL events, but harder to compare because of different starting stack sizes (7,500 instead of 10,000 - but has 3 more levels). I already wrote Poker stars, but have yet to hear back. I think we need to make our voice heard in order to get this changed. Please write Stars an email or post on here and we might be able to make something happen.
     2
  2. iPlayTourneys iPlayTourneys is online now

    Brazil

    Posts: 1,020
    Joined: Mar 10

    Aug 14th, 2010 (8/14/2010 3:53am) in reply to DuckU

    not planning on playing the $10K unless FTOPs is good to me this weekend.. However.. I totally agree. seems crazy. Should have ME structure 4 sure...
    161 
  3. Gettin Daize Gettin Daize is offline

    Costa Rica

    Posts: 1,283
    Joined: Apr 07

    Aug 14th, 2010 (8/14/2010 4:40am) in reply to iPlayTourneys

    id rather win it in 16 hours instead of 35 but either way is fine with me.
    2 211 
  4. Bumbulbee_G Bumbulbee_G is offline

    Posts: 23
    Joined: Aug 10

    Aug 14th, 2010 (8/14/2010 5:30am) in reply to Gettin Daize

    i do not mind the structure as it is but would not disgree with a change to deeper format
  5. telks telks is offline

    Costa Rica

    Posts: 732
    Joined: Dec 08

    Aug 14th, 2010 (8/14/2010 5:57am) in reply to Bumbulbee_G

    agree please fix this, it makes no sense.
    80 1
Reply to Thread