Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

What is the fastest way to copy a hand history into this blog?

Reply to Thread
  1. T100K T100K is offline

    Olathe, KS
    United States

    Posts: 5
    Joined: May 07

    Mar 9th, 2010 (3/9/2010 1:27pm)

    In the Hand Advice section I read alot of the Post, and I wanted to know the fastest way to Post a hand History? Knowing that many of you multi table, do you copy the Hand # while at the table and at the end of the session or tourny go find it and copy the whole thing into your post, or is there some faster way? Do you use your tracking software to mark a particular hand and search for only marked hands in data base, and then copy and paste that into Your Post? Any thoughts would be apprresiated. My spelling sucks so I understand if you grill me on it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  2. MYBLUEDOG MYBLUEDOG is offline

    Greenville, MS
    United States

    Posts: 1,999
    Joined: May 07

    Mar 10th, 2010 (3/10/2010 1:00pm) in reply to T100K

    Most sites let you "Auto-save" HH to your hard-drive. After your session you look up the folder and copy/paste them to where you want to discuss them.

    Just go to the drop downs on each site and select auto-save on the HH things. Each site has them in a different location.

    Also make a note of the file location on your PC hard-drive.

    That goes along with marking them in you HM if that's what you use. There is no one way. You do what is comfortable.

    You could open a notepad and keep it open whale playing. Then copy HH to notepad while you play. That becomes difficult some of the times when you are multi-tabling.
  3. T100K T100K is offline

    Olathe, KS
    United States

    Posts: 5
    Joined: May 07

    Mar 10th, 2010 (3/10/2010 4:54pm) in reply to MYBLUEDOG

    Cool, That is what I figured, but If you play 1000 hands and have to go back and look for a particular one that is very cumbersum, that is why I wondered if there was a faster way.

    Thanks for your responce
    Thread Starter
Reply to Thread

Similar Threads