Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. I was curious why people always say that certain sites like Cake, Carbon, Bodog etc are softer and fishier than stars and FTP.
    I ask cuz you would think Stars and FTP would have more fish considering they run constant commercials and are the 1st sites alot of new players would sign up with.
    Where as the smaller sites are really more known to players that are already playing online poker..
  2.  
    Originally Posted by Plan Z View Post

    I was curious why people always say that certain sites like Cake, Carbon, Bodog etc are softer and fishier than stars and FTP.
    I ask cuz you would think Stars and FTP would have more fish considering they run constant commercials and are the 1st sites alot of new players would sign up with.
    Where as the smaller sites are really more known to players that are already playing online poker..

    The sites with a sportsbook attached are typically softer.
  3. The sites with online casinos (Cake, Carbon, Bodog) and sports betting (Bodog) seem to be fishier. People are more in it to gamble than grind it out and work at it imo.
  4. I see, makes sense..
    Does Cake have a casino?
    Thread Starter
  5. The smaller sites apply more to a niche market in general. Because FTP and stars are the largest and best they offer more things for the grinder including wider selection of tournaments including higher stakes and larger fields, sit and go's run more often, there's a wider variety and greater selection of cash tables offered, etc. This in turn attracts all the regs. You will rarely find a reg who plays online and doesn't have the majority of their play at either stars or ftp (or both) with other smaller sites that compliment their overall grind. Result: Small sites are fishier and have less regs. GL
     
  6.  
    Originally Posted by Frank1The1Tank View Post

    The smaller sites apply more to a niche market in general. Because FTP and stars are the largest and best they offer more things for the grinder including wider selection of tournaments including higher stakes and larger fields, sit and go's run more often, there's a wider variety and greater selection of cash tables offered, etc. This in turn attracts all the regs. You will rarely find a reg who plays online and doesn't have the majority of their play at either stars or ftp (or both) with other smaller sites that compliment their overall grind. Result: Small sites are fishier and have less regs. GL

    Awesome post, thanx. GL
    Thread Starter
  7. ya this post is legit...DL cake ATM lol
     
  8. Cake is awesome. ROI at cake in the same games should be much higher than stars or ftp.
  9.  
    Originally Posted by andrewkr80 View Post

    Cake is awesome. ROI at cake in the same games should be much higher than stars or ftp.

    Exactly, my roomate plays $24-$72 6 man turbo sit n go's for a living, Cake ROI 17%, Pstars 13%