Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
  1. First post here, but been lurking for a while. Would just like to say thanks to some of the great players here who take the time to help donks like me understand the game a bit more.

    I've been playing $5 and $10 STT and MTT sngs on party and FullTilt since the beginning of the year and have dropped about $700 (affordably to me, I'm a pretty successful lawyer - I just don't like losing), although my lose rate has slowed considerably in the last month or two. Given such an appalling record, you'd be perfectly entitled to ignore my thoughts on whyI'm losing - but here they are anyway.

    It's easy to blame bad beats for losing - they tend to be memorable and they're often the ones that see you bust out. But its easy to forget the number of times you lose chips to better hands ot the times you win chips with better hands. So far, so obvious. But my key failing here is that I haven't been giving enough respect to my opponents. Just because I'm an intelligent guy who reads books and web articles on poker doesn't mean they don't do the same or that I'm prima facie better then they are. On FT, at least, a table will only usually have one or two maniacs. In my last game, we got to 45 minutes in before the second player was knocked out (me, if you have to know).

    My second big failing is aggression on the bubble. It goes against my instincts to push with crap hands, but I'm just going to have to grit my teeth and do it. This is harder for recreational players who have two or three games a night than it is for multi-tablers because it feels bad to finish OOTM all night.

    Well, I'm down to my last few buy-ins at FT and when and if that goes will be moving to stars. I'm going to go in with $300 and play $3 STGs. If I lose that, I'm done. I may also invest in SNGPT though I'm sceptical that I'd have the time to use it properly - with works and kids, I only have an hour or two a day to myself and I'm not sure if I have the discipline to not play.

    Any thoughts?


    This was my first post here a month or so ago.

    I ended up depositing $170 on Stars and soon after won a 180 man £4.40 allowing me to withdraw that $170. Recently I seem to be running good and am close to feeling confident that I’m a winning player, at least at the $4-$6 level. I don’t say that because I’ve been winning a fair amount (a ROI of 95% in 60 odd games is nice, if statistically insignificant) but because I am now cashing in games even where I’m virtually card dead. I’ve learnt what is blindingly obvious to most of you guys - patience & discipline in the early stages, don’t play fancy, push when your M starts to get into single figures. I’ve known most of this in theory for quite a while, but would get impatient if I didn’t see a flop for 20 hands or so but at last I’m putting it into practice, for the most part.

    I won’t go crazy on this - for example, I won’t move up a level until I’ve proved to myself beyond reasonable doubt that I am a winning player at this level. For me, that means getting my BR from it’s current $300 to around $1K. It also means trying to find the time to do a lot more studying and thinking about my game

    It’s taken me 5 months to get to this stage - how long did it take you guys?
  2. I don't know if you will understand this; but, you just don't get it. I don't mean to be critical, just some advice. Join one of the training sites, I think they will make all the difference in the world. I belong to Poker X Factor and they can take the blinders off.

    Good Luck
  3. That’s OK, you can be critical - though some specifics might help. I assume you think the style I described is a pretty poor one and I’m sure you’re right at higher levels. But I honestly think it works at the $5 level and is a solid base to build on .

    I’m strongly considering joining PokerXFactor but the cost is half my bankroll and I’m worried that I wouldn’t have the time to get full value out of it ( work 12 hours a day and have a kid, so I only have 1-2 hours leisure time a day).
    Thread Starter
  4. I spent about 9 months of last year losing. I've only played in homegames before that, and I was about break even there.

    Around new year I decided to take poker way more serious than I have done so far, and started keeping track of everything I played. I soon noticed that I was losing in cash games and MTTs and winning in sit n gos. I started playing mostly sit n go's, and quit cash games, and saw my bankroll starting to build up. I also joined PokerXFactor and started to work on my MTT game. Now I think I am a winning MTT player too, but my sample size is too small to say for sure. After joining PokerXFactor it was basicly paid for it self (more than once).
  5. I bet u money u could watch just two or three sngs by a pro and improve ur game by 100%.. And u said money isnt really the issue so dont worry about it and just join one. They have links here on pocket fives.. The next time u play, U will think wtf was I thinking before.. I think these sites are more than worth the price.. For people who are loosing players especially.. And y would u give up poker over a thousand dollars??? Someone has to feed these guys around here.. Lol gl
  6. The advie on joining xfactor seems pretty strong and I'm inclined to take it.. But how much time do you need to devote to learning through Xfactor (in, say, a month) to make it worthwhile?
    Thread Starter
  7. The videos are 30-50 minutes long. After only watching a few I learned a LOT. I used the stuff I learned in the videos to win a $5 MTT, and they had only published 5-6 videos at that time. I think the least amount of time you have to spend watching videos there to make it worth it is probably no more than 4-6 hours a month. This can ofcourse vary from person to person, depending on how fast of a learner you are.
  8. I learned I was a winning player when I wasn't afraid of losing anymore.

    I just tried to make the play that best fit my knowledge of the game, and went with it. Whether I win or lose now is just details, baby.
  9. I don't know - the end of your post gave the impression you had a grip on basic sng startegy - tight early doors - agression building up into the latter stages. This foundation can be easily set with just reading all the articles on this site.

    I don't know why people just don't get back to the basics of poker :

    Hand playing.

    Just keep playing and improve your knowledge of appropriate actions on each street.

    I think there is far to much emphasis on - 'oh my M was this, etc' - this is easy stuff. The playing of a hand and your position is your area of study in the main.

    After that - as Gidders say - if you're making the correct decisions - then your results are irrelevant.

    Good luck!
  10. I figure the training sites are great, but I'm not sure the guy here really wants to be "serious" in the sense that many people are serious here. He uses poker to unwind at the end of a stressful day. Would they help him, sure they would. Would he have a better winning percentage, maybe (he is playing a lower level, and if it's finally clicked how to play here, his winning percentage over the last 60 have been fine).

    So, I wouldn't discourage a training site (I haven't done one myself) if you wanted to devote some time to it. But, I'm not sure it's neccessary. There are many free posts here in the strategy section that can send you on your way to good enough results (again, he's a lawyer, so winning 10K would be nice in a big MTT, but it isn't going to get him anything extra in his life, if he wants it, he probably has it)

    To me, I think I turned a corner at these lower events (SnG's anyway) one day while I was playing. I took a "bad beat" and was out, and a lightbulb went off that I should have pushed the hand harder pre-flop there. I sat and thought about my game the next day at work, went home, and took 2 SnG's that night, and started winning (+$200 over the last 3 months since then, plus $130 overall).

    For me, you can read and discuss and watch others play, but I really need to play and try everythign out to really learn.

    Remember, poker is first and foremost fun. Everything other than that is gravy.
  11. (How the hell do you post in a thread without replying to a specific post)

    Some great responses here.

    Scha, that's exactly what I needed to know. My wife and son are visiting relatives in Spain next month, so I think I'll take a few days of work and make a concerted attempt to improve my game through xfactor.

    Darcy - you're absolutely right, of course. SNG strategies (and I've read a lot of them) speak almost exclusively to pre-flop play. I spend quite a lot of time trying to figure out whether I made the right play or not on a hand or not. One big problem with my game is that when I am in a hand I often act to quickly without thinking things through. Nevertheless, I am trying to get into the habit of putting people on a range of hands every hand, whether I'm playing it or not. I'm not very successful (a combination of mine and my opponent's incompetence).

    Xixor - you're half right. Poker is just a game to me but it has become my main hobby. I do have a solid income (though lawyers in the UK don't make what they do in the US) but I also have a mammoth mortgage to pay and I'm more or less the sole bbreadwinner in the family. Gambling's tax-free here, so a few hundred dollars a month would be very welcome.
    Thread Starter
  12. Well you've already taken the right train of thought :

    'I am trying to get into the habit of putting people on a range of hands every hand, whether I'm playing it or not. I'm not very successful (a combination of mine and my opponent's incompetence).'

    Suggests you're obviously attempting to elevate your playing level - and in the right way. You're criticising yourself which is great but 'opponent's incompetence' - is something you need to get rid of.

    If an opponent is 'incompetent' - this is part of their playing makeup that you take into consideration when in a pot with them.

    As long as you don't start using it as a reason for losing that's fine.

    A basic rule of thumb when playing poker is that the worse a player is you're up against, a bigger edge you require to play a bit pot with them. This doesn't just apply to calling for big pots - but pushing over the top as well.

    GL sir.
  13. "Remember, poker is first and foremost fun. Everything other than that is gravy."

    I disagree. Poker is a fun way to make money. a fun way to get your competetive juices flowing. A fun way of XXXXXXX.

    BUt just fun. then everythign else? not to me.
  14. That's a very interesting concept. Like many in poker it's counter-intuitive but once you think about it, clearly logical.

    "Opponent's incompetence" is a reference to the generic level of play in $5 SNGs. Many players at this level will play a wide variety of hands pre-flop and continue to play them if they catch any part of the flop. This obviously makes it more difficult to put them on a hand. Poker tracker helps, of course, but I'm chary of labelling a player until there's a reasonable sample size or I've seen them show down some hands.

    Anyway, practice makes perfect and I am gradually getting better at it. The next step is learning to trust my reads. If I think he's got his inside straight draw, he probably has and I need to learn to stop paying to find out for sure.
    Thread Starter
  15. Why would you withdrawal 170 if your a successful lawyer? That really doesn't make sense if you're trying to build a roll.
     
  16. Read the aticles on sng's by gidders and fox
    read harringtons ist chapter
    Reread harringtons first chapter then the 2nd
    Reread harringtons first chapter then the 2nd then the 3rd and so on
    Grind $5 sng's untill your account hits $500 then grind $10 sng's till your account hits$800
    Then play$20 sng's
    Forget all that and learn omaha that's where the easy money is
  17. I did my calculations using my neteller deposits

    2004 -$1634.32 (had about 1000 online at the end of the year that this includes as a loss cause it was out of my bank account)
    2005 +$41 917 (was pretty consistant from Jan on...some swings but most months were positive)
    2006 +$122 873 and counting

    Really I lost for my first 4-5 months of playing (albeit I wasn't playing all that much) and didn't really win alot until I managed to win a few tourneys to build up my roll and confidence. Winning is a mindset and once you start winning you know that you can get there again. If you are losing consistently assess your play and find out what is causing it...if you can't fix it then you can find someone from an instructional site to help of possibly quit playing for serious money if you feel it is negatively affecting your life..just my opinion.
     1
  18. I'd rather it was earning interest for me than for PS. Actually, I want to pay back all the money I donked away in the first few months of playing online so that I'm just playing with money I've won, then when I've built a decent nabkroll I'll move up a level. I'm not sure if that's the right thing from a rational point of view, but it feels right and it makes extra sure I don't move up a level before I'm really ready too.
    Thread Starter
  19. What he said.
  20. That's hugely impressive. Must give you a hell of a buzz to see such swift and profitable progress,
    Thread Starter
  21. degenrat,

    I'm a competitive person at heart. I love playing anything where I have a chance to win, when everyone else is trying to win too. And sure, if you can do it, poker is a great way to make money. But, unless I'm a pro, I'm not playing if I don't feel like it. I don't ever force myself to play. If I don't want to play tonight, I won't. If I would rather watch the Tiger game on tonight than play, I will. If I don't play all week, oh well (won't happen, I'll get an itch to play before then).

    But, I play because I enjoy it. I enjoy the feeling of trying to outplay someone else, or the feeling when that person tries to trash talk me, only to have him go out, and I get the money.

    But, if your not having fun, why play? Because if your only playing for money, it might be worth it to you, but 99% of people would be better off spending their time and money going to school, then getting a better job and working more hours. It won't be fun, but it'll be profitable. Why don't most people do this? It's because they enjoy playing poker (and it's this enjoyment that allows many of the pros out there the opportunity to be pros).
  22. hey peraljam1012, thats a big swing in just a year....

    how did you do it? grind? win a big tourney?
  23. i have bee playing poker and studying it for 3 years. even though my stats show that i am in the black i am not declaring that i am a winner until i am playing full time for a full 5 years. so i will let you know in 2009. ;)
  24. The facts are some people,eck I'm willing to bet 75% of all players dont make money at this game.. And probably only 5% can be professionals at it. I'm one of those players who pretty much break even. I had stars send me Summary History of all my MT tourney play this year. And Net Profit 16 bucks for the year.. LOL I also had them send me Summary of all my SNG play this year... net Profit 365 bucks. So like I figured I wasnt a losing player.

    If your gonna play on Stars SNG's you might want to try the 4 Dollar SNG's 180. 300 BR will buy you into 75 of them. You should be able to win a few out of 75 chances. A win is 216 to the BR. But they take about 4 hours to complete.. So if you dont have the time counselor. Gl. CYA on Stars

    FINK
  25. Thanks. Yeah, I love those 180s. As mentioned above I even won one of the 7 or 8 I played. Small beer I know, but it gave me a buzz.

    Wish I did have time to play them regularly, but I'd pay for any FT with another hour's sleep lopped off the already dodgy 6 i get.

    I'll look out for you Fink.
    Thread Starter
  26. "affordably to me"

    Did he say affordably?

    "prima facie"

    Did he say that too?

    "learnt"

    Did he say learnt?

    Lawyers are funny.
  27. I first knew I was a winning player when I began to advise other players on when I first knew I was a winning player.

    fj

  28. I think you said it best.

    "although my lose rate has slowed considerably in the last month or two."

    and in 2 months you might be saying

    "although I am a break even player in the last month or two."

    and in 2 more months you might be saying

    "although I am winning a little bit in the last month or two."

    and in 2 more months you might be saying

    "although I am a complete stud in SNGs and will take on anyone in the world."

    Just keeping reading, analyzing your game, watch better players, it's a job like any other, there is a learning curve.

  29. When I said you don't get it and recommended Poker X Factor, I was wanting to say and I admit to having problems explaining, poker is not really about the cards; it's about people. Most people don't really understand this. The folks over at 2+2 are all wrapped up in the numbers and have no concept of "feel". Poker X Factor in one or two videos will turn on the lights and give you a glimpse of what poker is really all about. Forget about Poker Tracker and PAHUD, they are nothing more than a crutch and will keep you from developing a true sense of feel for the game. Once you understand what I am talking about, you will not have to worry about being a loosing player.

    GL
  30. hey peraljam1012, thats a big swing in just a year....

    Was this a personal Shot to me? jk!!

Similar Threads