Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

why am i a winning player at 100/200 and a losing player at 10/20

Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2
  1. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:00am)

    fsdfjsdklfjdsfsdklfsd

    I don't understand.

    Any ideas?
     
  2. moobs96 moobs96 is offline

    Toronto
    Canada

    Posts: 774
    Joined: Mar 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:03am) in reply to charder

    and that is a problem because?
  3. AFink93 AFink93 is offline

    Norwich, CT
    United States

    Posts: 14,381
    Joined: Mar 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:06am) in reply to charder

    Ghey?
  4. billm420 billm420 is offline

    Austin, TX
    United States

    Posts: 113
    Joined: Jul 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:07am) in reply to charder

    because you ran well, and now varriance is proving how much of a fucking joke you are.

    :)
  5. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:08am) in reply to AFink93

    it sucks because im a student and cashed out a lot of the 1/200 winnings (like 40kish) and now i cant win at 10/20. blah. maybe i was jsut running insane at 100/200, i think thats a possibilty. blah
     
    Thread Starter
  6. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:09am) in reply to billm420

    hi billm

    ;)

    thats prolyl true. lolll.
     
    Thread Starter
  7. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:15am) in reply to charder

    some people i no theorized that my game is actually better for 1/200 then 10/20, because well im a tourney lagtard and never saw a suited connector i didnt like. And since in 10/20 when u see a flop at 6 max is often 3 of more handed, while at 100/200 its HU most of the time and rarely do people cold call. I think this kinda of makes sense.
     
    Thread Starter
  8. PokerPete PokerPete is offline

    Lake Forest, CA
    United States

    Posts: 108
    Joined: Oct 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:32am) in reply to charder

    so you donked off the full 40k charder??
  9. showtime90 showtime90 is offline

    United States

    Posts: 9,061
    Joined: Jul 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:35am) in reply to PokerPete

    it sucks because im a student and cashed out a lot of the 1/200 winnings (like 40kish) and now i cant win at 10/20. blah. maybe i was jsut running insane at 100/200, i think thats a possibilty. blah
  10. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:36am) in reply to PokerPete

    no, did u read what i wrote pete? second post. i cashed out lke 47K (7k of it was from MTTs/ Sit n goes)
     
    Thread Starter
  11. PokerPete PokerPete is offline

    Lake Forest, CA
    United States

    Posts: 108
    Joined: Oct 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:37am) in reply to charder

    so you are saying its not possible to put the 40k back on that you had ONCE cashed out??
  12. inverse12 inverse12 is offline

    Ames, IA
    United States

    Posts: 74
    Joined: Nov 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:37am) in reply to charder

    some people i no theorized that my game is actually better for 1/200 then 10/20, because well im a tourney lagtard and never saw a suited connector i didnt like. And since in 10/20 when u see a flop at 6 max is often 3 of more handed, while at 100/200 its HU most of the time and rarely do people cold call. I think this kinda of makes sense.

    this analysis couldn't have been worse. try again
     
  13. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:40am) in reply to PokerPete

    not really possible...... havent we gone over this pete. Netteller=illegal in Maryland/ no firepay/ no echecks. Mean the onlyway i get money online is thru friends. and there not gonna let me lose 50k. lol.
     
    Thread Starter
  14. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:42am) in reply to inverse12

    gum/adam/inverse, i didnt really word it correctly, but it kinda makes sense, in some way. lol.
     
    Thread Starter
  15. CAH CAH is offline

    Posts: 183
    Joined: Nov 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:55am) in reply to charder

    Sounds like a good problem
  16. Kajun Kajun is offline

    United States

    Posts: 5,485
    Joined: Nov 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 3:03am) in reply to charder

    Best advice... move out of MAryland....
  17. MehnDaMassah MehnDaMassah is offline

    Posts: 60
    Joined: Jun 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 3:23am) in reply to charder

    how long were you "mabye just running super hot" @ 100/200 for? cause i mean...a "Winning" player @ 100/200 for more than a moth or so shouldnt you have much more money than 40k? or were you a winning player for a day
  18. beanie beanie is offline

    Saint Paul, MN
    United States

    Posts: 6,272
    Joined: Jan 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 3:50am) in reply to MehnDaMassah

    its not a good problem if you have 7k and can't beat 10-20.

    Assuming you are playing limit what you are saying is not completely abnormal. I know of many people in your situation.
  19. iminurhead iminurhead is offline

    Rhinelander, WI
    United States

    Posts: 334
    Joined: Oct 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 9:55am) in reply to charder

    i can tell u this , if u r playing 10/20 with 7k br u will most likely be busto soon, poor br mngmt. for nl
  20. EL-Irish EL-Irish is offline

    AZ
    United States

    Posts: 407
    Joined: Jun 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 10:06am) in reply to iminurhead

    Your Bored.
  21. dd dd is offline

    Monroe, LA
    United States

    Posts: 1,596
    Joined: Apr 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 10:08am) in reply to charder

    Contact support and mail them a check.
  22. beauright beauright is offline

    Saint Petersburg, FL
    United States

    Posts: 1,637
    Joined: Jun 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 10:14am) in reply to EL-Irish

    I'm gonna call BS.

    If you are playing 100/200, then you just got lucky. Theoretically, people consistently beating this level know how to analyze their game and not make 'guesses' at what is wrong.
  23. beanie beanie is offline

    Saint Paul, MN
    United States

    Posts: 6,272
    Joined: Jan 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 10:21am) in reply to beauright

    certainly you are correct, though I give the kid some credit, he did win 47k playing a tough game. While my bread gets buttered at 30-60 I am profitable up to 100-200 and all the way dwn to 5-10 (I could tell you how I know this but I would have to kill you). A good player would be able to adjust at any level. I suggest playing more short handed.
  24. JoeHead JoeHead is offline

    Grand Haven, MI
    United States

    Posts: 2,702
    Joined: Dec 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 10:45am) in reply to beanie

    Charder is talking about LHE, I watched him hit every draw he had for about a week... Sick run, He was smart enough to get thousands of dollars off the net and move down in limits.
  25. FeloniousPunk FeloniousPunk is offline

    Ithaca, NY
    United States

    Posts: 231
    Joined: Jul 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:44pm) in reply to charder

    Yes, but it is too profitable playing with you at 10/20 to tell you how to fix your game...
  26. StIcKyFiNgErS StIcKyFiNgErS is offline

    Posts: 1,242
    Joined: Sep 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:47pm) in reply to charder

    this post is terrible
  27. JWangSDC JWangSDC is offline

    Irvington, NY
    United States

    Posts: 593
    Joined: Jun 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 1:56pm) in reply to charder

    Sounds like u were just running hot because of small sample size, but I def believe its' true that sometimes you cannot beat a lower level as well as a higher level. I'm the most marginal winner @ .05/.10 NL...and .10/.25 NL can't give me a better bb/100 than I get in NL 100 and NL 200.

    I don't think you can be a losing player @ lower levels and still be a winning one @ higher levels.
  28. riskybusines riskybusines is offline

    Birmingham, AL
    United States

    Posts: 452
    Joined: Nov 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 2:51pm) in reply to charder

    seems the suited connector type hands would have more value with three people taking a flop rather than two, just a thought, i def could be wrong.
  29. charder charder is offline

    Annapolis, MD
    United States

    Posts: 2,511
    Joined: May 06

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 3:07pm) in reply to JoeHead

    i was runnin good, no doubt, but with my maniac/donkish image, they started to pay me off with nething. i remember one hand. i raise T9 on the button, SB raises, and BB Cold calls. and the flop is 9xx and the SB leads out and i just call (i usually raise there, not sure why i jsut called) well the turn is a 9, the SB leads out agian and the BB calls and i obv raise, the SB folds and the BB (who is a bracelet winner, btw) calls me down with AJ high.

    Im a losing player at the short term at 10/20, 5/10 etc, and i could prolly be a winning player, im just havent played a lot, and also im not playing very good. I remember catching myself raise with T7o UTG at a 6 max game yesterday and i was like, wtf am i doing. I think thats part of the problem, im not playing as good as i can.
     
    Thread Starter
  30. boozhwaa boozhwaa is offline

    Matawan, NJ
    United States

    Posts: 1,091
    Joined: Jan 05

    Dec 6th, 2006 (12/6/2006 3:08pm) in reply to charder

    Either you were on a really good run or you haven't been able to adjust to the different playing styles of your new opponents. Also, maybe you "gamble" too much now that the money isn't as big in each hand. What kind of hand count do you have at each level? Maybe you just need more practice.
Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 21 2

Similar Threads