1. 300th!
  2. just...wow.
  3. the lack of reading comprehension in PD, judging from the responses
  4. who did what for who now? WAT
  5. sure, wretchy said he played as whatslogic but never played as both himself and whatslogic in the same tourny, and he says pstars agreed with that. could he be lying and making it all up? I guess.

    so far I've seen about 8 posts where people say he played as whatslogic while his gf played as wretchy. not sure where they got this info. I'd love to know more, but it seems the accusations are flying much faster than any sort of documentation or facts. I've also seen many people go apeshit because wretchy "played both accounts in the same tournaments". again, no documentation or facts. could they be right? sure, but that's not what the op, and, as the op states, stars says.

    it's like if wretchy said he went to the store and stole a loaf of bread, got caught, and was banned from the store for three months, and then 56 people started yelling about him stealing bread, pissing in aisle three and smacking tha bagboy on the way out. it could be true, I'd just like to see some proof of their allegations
  6.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    judging from the responses, the lack of reading comprehension in PD is uphauling

    judging from this response your spelling is appalling
     
  7. siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh. is it?

    of all people...
    such <STRIKE>ironing</STRIKE> (opps misspelled) irony
  8. After page 10 I started skimming so if the point that I am about to make has already been made...forgive me.

    For the people who are sticking up for this guy, think about the "big fight" that is being fought on our behalf in Washington. There are people donating a lot of time and a lot of money to allow legal and safe online poker for all of us to play. I have to think that the opponents of this legalization would pick up on this multi-accounting issue and use it as the basis of thier arguments.

    By supporting this chump, you are hurting yourselves in the long run.

    And yes I'm a noob here at P5, but this point needs to be heard.
  9.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    sure, wretchy said he played as whatslogic but never played as both himself and whatslogic in the same tourny, and he says pstars agreed with that. could he be lying and making it all up? I guess.

    so far I've seen about 8 posts where people say he played as whatslogic while his gf played as wretchy. not sure where they got this info. I'd love to know more, but it seems the accusations are flying much faster than any sort of documentation or facts. I've also seen many people go apeshit because wretchy "played both accounts in the same tournaments". again, no documentation or facts. could they be right? sure, but that's not what the op, and, as the op states, stars says.

    it's like if wretchy said he went to the store and stole a loaf of bread, got caught, and was banned from the store for three months, and then 56 people started yelling about him stealing bread, pissing in aisle three and smacking tha bagboy on the way out. it could be true, I'd just like to see some proof of their allegations

    You sir are an idiot gtfo, he is a cheating scumbag pos, with at least 3 accounts and prob alot more...........maybe you need a reading comprehension class
  10.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    siiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiigh. is it?

    of all people...
    such <strike>ironing</strike> (opps misspelled) irony

    oh not sure i'd seen uphauling before. my bad i guess. should have just closed my labtop
     
  11. gifagfyiamfgf? he has what now? oh tell me more about his "probable" accounts? moran
    motismIV has 16 accounts! you heard it here first! prove me wrong! he probably beats old ladies for their rent checks too! omg!
  12. lol in your defense it hasn't been that widely used. pls keep labtop up & running
  13.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    sure, wretchy said he played as whatslogic but never played as both himself and whatslogic in the same tourny, and he says pstars agreed with that. could he be lying and making it all up? I guess.

    so far I've seen about 8 posts where people say he played as whatslogic while his gf played as wretchy. not sure where they got this info. I'd love to know more, but it seems the accusations are flying much faster than any sort of documentation or facts. I've also seen many people go apeshit because wretchy "played both accounts in the same tournaments". again, no documentation or facts. could they be right? sure, but that's not what the op, and, as the op states, stars says.

    it's like if wretchy said he went to the store and stole a loaf of bread, got caught, and was banned from the store for three months, and then 56 people started yelling about him stealing bread, pissing in aisle three and smacking tha bagboy on the way out. it could be true, I'd just like to see some proof of their allegations

    I'd take this post more seriously if norcaljeff had ever posted a single rational thought in his career on p5s.
     
  14.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    so far I've seen about 8 posts where people say he played as whatslogic while his gf played as wretchy. not sure where they got this info. I'd love to know more, but it seems the accusations are flying much faster than any sort of documentation or facts. I've also seen many people go apeshit because wretchy "played both accounts in the same tournaments". again, no documentation or facts. could they be right? sure, but that's not what the op, and, as the op states, stars says.

    Your reading comprehension may be the one that is lacking, norcaljeff. Lemme make it simple for you. The below situation shows a specific instance in which Wretchy was clearly playing as WhatsLogic, while his Wretchy account was in the same tournament.

    1) Look at this thread created by wretchy. I have included the link of the whole thread, and I have included a post by Wretchy that shows that he was playing as WhatsLogic during this tournament. Specifically, see the bottom of the post where Wretchy says "I figure if hes got a draw on the turn hes shoving or raising, hes hoping his pair is good on the river on a huge bluff because he was spewing chips like crazy. GG HIM"

    http://www.pocketfives.com/poker-for...103465#2103465

     
    Originally Posted by Wretchy View Post

    <h4> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr valign="middle"><td rowspan="2" valign="top" align="left"> </td><td colspan="2" align="left"><table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td>Re(4): OT Thoughts on Hand </td><td valign="middle" align="right">In reply to </td></tr></tbody></table> </td></tr><tr><td align="left">By Wretchy on 10-07-2007 8:14 PM </td><td align="right"><span>Locked</span> </td></tr></tbody></table> </h4> <table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr valign="top"><td><table width="100%" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" height="100%"><tbody><tr><td>Full Tilt Poker Game #3787708734: The Sunday Mulligan (28037115) Table 44 - 80/160 - No Limit Hold'em - 20:57:01 ET - 2007/10/07
    Seat 1: Michnak (4 280)
    Seat 2: anjlewis (8 580)
    Seat 3: WhatsLogic (12 836)
    Seat 4: 88KOOK (9 128)
    Seat 5: dib9 (8 328)
    Seat 6: NETROM1 (3 415)
    Seat 7: teek_00 (5 118)
    Seat 8: go6p9k (8 545)
    Seat 9: ELMO_MASK (4 250)
    teek_00 posts the small blind of 80
    go6p9k posts the big blind of 160
    The button is in seat #6

    Holecards:
    Dealt to WhatsLogic [ ]
    ELMO_MASK folds
    Michnak folds
    anjlewis folds
    WhatsLogic raises to 460
    88KOOK folds
    dib9 calls 460
    NETROM1 folds
    teek_00 folds
    go6p9k folds

    Flop:
    [ ]
    WhatsLogic checks
    dib9 bets 500
    WhatsLogic calls 500

    Turn:
    [ ] [ ]
    WhatsLogic bets 960
    dib9 calls 960

    River:
    [ ] [ ]
    WhatsLogic checks
    dib9 bets 5,000
    WhatsLogic has 15 seconds left to act
    WhatsLogic calls 5 000

    Showdown :
    dib9 shows [ ] Ace King high
    WhatsLogic shows [ ] three of a kind, Jacks
    WhatsLogic wins the pot (14,080) with three of a kind, Jacks

    SUMMARY:
    Total pot 14,080 | Rake 0
    Board:
    [ ]
    Seat 1: Michnak didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 2: anjlewis didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 3: WhatsLogic showed [ ] and won (14 080) with three of a kind Jacks
    Seat 4: 88KOOK didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 5: dib9 showed [ ] and lost with Ace King high
    Seat 6: NETROM1 (button) didn't bet (folded)
    Seat 7: teek_00 (small blind) folded before the Flop
    Seat 8: go6p9k (big blind) folded before the Flop

    \
    I figure if hes got a draw on the turn hes shoving or raising, hes hoping his pair is good on the river on a huge bluff because he was spewing chips like crazy. GG HIM </td></tr></tbody></table> </td></tr></tbody></table>

    2) The above hand history was from the FTP Sunday Mulligan, on 10/7/2007. As you can see from officialpokerrankings.com, BOTH WhatsLogic and Wretchy were playing in this tournament. I have included the links and screen shots of OPR showing this below. The tournament in question is hilighted to enhance your ability to comprehend what I am getting at.

    http://www.officialpokerrankings.com...FE091.html?t=2

    http://www.officialpokerrankings.com...EE5A0.html?t=2





    3) point #1 + point #2 = multiaccounting.

    norcaljeff, wretchy, sluggerwv, fulltiltpoker security team, or anyone else...please feel free to explain the above situation.
  15. sharp fails again. news at always. sigh
  16. thanks mupp. although not to nitpick but in the OT post where he's asking for thoughts, I think he could make the defense that he was asking about a hand his gf played. not saying that's the case! again, I haven't defended him, I'm just looking for "guilty without a doubt" evidence (which i understand we may never have. but if stars says he didn't MA I think that is good enough. I guess we are still waiting for FTP's decision?) that is pretty bad tho, and I'd like to see if he has an answer for it
  17. I think him saying the following is is enough evidence to me that he was playing the hand:

     
    Originally Posted by Wretchy View Post

    I figure if hes got a draw on the turn hes shoving or raising, hes hoping his pair is good on the river on a huge bluff because he was spewing chips like crazy. GG HIM"

    It may not be enough evidence for FTP to permaban him and confiscate hundreds of thousands of dollars, but I know what I think about the situation. And I know what any reasonable person would think about the situation. You saying that he's not a cheater because "stars says he didn't MA" is like saying OJ Simpson is not guilty of murder b/c he was acquitted during his trial.

     
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    that is pretty bad tho, and I'd like to see if he has an answer for it

    he won't answer, guaranteed.
  18. Norcal is just playing devils advocate chillllllllllll.
  19.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    sharp fails again. news at always. sigh

    Great comeback.

    Call me crazy but I'd call 17,000 posts in less than two years on an internet forum "failing at life."
     
  20. WOW Mu.. if FTP reads that post i think it might be curtains for Wretchy on that site..
  21. tell me more about my posting on the site you post on. supreme ironing
  22. I said he wasn't a cheater? no, I said I was willing to wait for the sites' conclusions. and oj was acquitted. doesn't mean he didn't do it.
  23.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    and oj was acquitted. doesn't mean he didn't do it.

    and just b/c stars couldn't find sufficient evidence to permaban him doesn't mean he didn't multiaccount.
  24. exactly. and?
  25.  
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

     
    Originally Posted by MUPokerPlayer View Post

    Wretchy, what about the tourneys where there were rail calls for you where you were playing as "WhatsLogic" and the username "Wretchy" was also in? Your girlfriend was playing the "Wretchy" account during those times? But all other times you played as Wretchy and she played as WhatsLogic?

    Wretchy, if you insist that this saga is over, please explain this situation and what was going on here. Otherwise you still have no credibility.

    Wow 3 names Now .. I mean WTF .. seriously .. Who am i playing when i am Playing MTTs.. LOL .. you mother fuckers have more personality's "Accounts" then a Fucking Sports team.. fucking man up and play like the rest of us .. For crying out fucking loud You RE RE FUCK TARD
  26.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    thanks mupp. although not to nitpick but in the OT post where he's asking for thoughts, I think he could make the defense that he was asking about a hand his gf played. not saying that's the case! again, I haven't defended him, I'm just looking for "guilty without a doubt" evidence (which i understand we may never have. but if stars says he didn't MA I think that is good enough. I guess we are still waiting for FTP's decision?) that is pretty bad tho, and I'd like to see if he has an answer for it

    Don't u still legitimately believe Barry Bonds never juiced?
  27. it's not about whether he juiced, it's about no one ever proving it. he got screwed by mlb. and the hacks that wrote the boof used sealed, stolen grand jury testimony. it's an affront to fairness.
    and even if he did use it was because he looked around and saw everyone using and surpassing him, and he was the greatest clean player in baseball. mlb refused to do anything about the obviously rampant use so why should he get shafted for staying clean? the roid scandal isa 99% the fault of mlb, the mlbpa, the fans and the journalists. no one cared, that's why no one did anything about it. now all of a sudden everyone is shocked, just shocked, to find out roids were everywhere. such bullshitaments. they should save the self-righteous hypocrisy imo
  28.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    the roid scandal isa 99% the fault of mlb, the mlbpa, the fans and the journalists.

    Who would be at fault for the other 1%. Seems like you included everyone involved in your 99%?

    It also SEEMS (correct me if im reading it wrong) to me like you feel its OK to cheat if those around you cheat since they are surpassing you.

    By extension, Wretchy can win you over by saying he cheated because "everyone was doing it" and he would lose equity if he didnt jump in the cesspool with the rest of the cheating thieves.

    I would rather see online poker players go the route of Murderer and others who realize that outing these clowns is the ONLY way to ultimately create a level playing field.

    The game of poker has inherent in its nature the idea that you use all means neccesary to take someone else's money. Why are we shocked when kids who can't even buy cigarettes or alcohol legally blur this fine line and start doing things that are actually STEALING from fellow players.

    The only way we can clean up this game is if EVERYONE bands together and outs all of these thieves until its not worth the risk to cheat anymore.

    As long as this is even SLIGHTLY defended by the peers of these guys, it will continue.
  29. Who would be at fault for the other 1%. Seems like you included everyone involved in your 99%?

    - the cheaters

    It also SEEMS (correct me if im reading it wrong) to me like you feel its OK to cheat if those around you cheat since they are surpassing you.

    - no, but the decision to cheat would be more understandable. if you were in a class and everyone around you was cheating, and the teacher knew but didn't care, and anyone that said "Hey people are cheating" was ignored, and your grade would suffer as a result of their cheating and the teacher not caring, then I think it is more understandable. does it make it right? no.

    By extension, Wretchy can win you over by saying he cheated because "everyone was doing it" and he would lose equity if he didnt jump in the cesspool with the rest of the cheating thieves.

    - he wouldbe wrong to do so. but the sites would be more to blame if they knew about this problem and did nothing

    I would rather see online poker players go the route of Murderer and others who realize that outing these clowns is the ONLY way to ultimately create a level playing field.

    - sounds good. the more cheaters busted the more pressure on the sites to ensure a level playing field

    The game of poker has inherent in its nature the idea that you use all means neccesary to take someone else's money. Why are we shocked when kids who can't even buy cigarettes or alcohol legally blur this fine line and start doing things that are actually STEALING from fellow players.

    - all means necessary? I would say that dealing off the bottom of the deck or having 5 cheaters v. 1 noob at a table with them working together isn't poker at all, it's just cheating. that's like saying you do anything you can to succeed in life, so it's ok to rob someone.

    The only way we can clean up this game is if EVERYONE bands together and outs all of these thieves until its not worth the risk to cheat anymore.

    - yup

    As long as this is even SLIGHTLY defended by the peers of these guys, it will continue.

    - I haven't seen anyone defending cheating
  30.  
    Originally Posted by mhoddi View Post

     
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    judging from the responses, the lack of reading comprehension in PD is uphauling

    judging from this response your spelling is appalling

    LOL, one fail after another. jesus titty fucking christ, read once in a while please.

Similar Threads