Poker Articles

 
Sign in | Join
in
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!


Poker Articles

    • Google
    • Yahoo!
    • Bloglines
    • NewsGator
    • MSN
    • AOL
    • Technorati
    • RSS

Cash Games versus Multi-Table Tournaments

By Rizen | Published Jul 22 2009, 08:14 AM

I realize that most of the people on this site probably know who I am mainly for my poker tournament accomplishments, but due to some changes in my life (primarily my two children), I've branched out and started playing a lot more cash games as well. There are a couple of distinct differences I've noticed aside from the more obvious differences in play styles between cash and multi-table tournament play.

First is focus. I personally find it is much easier for me to stay focused in tournaments than it is in cash games for much longer periods of time. Tournament dynamics are constantly changing, the blinds are constantly rising, and the stacks (and players) at the table are always changing. All of this changes the overall 'feel' of the game very significantly. Also the top-heavy payout structures and various stages of tournament play, in my opinion, add a bigger overall level of excitement and help keep me focused for the 8+ hours that is often necessary to go deep or win a tournament.

Cash games are great, but without all the changing dynamics one thing I noticed was that during longer sessions my play (and then my results) would often suffer significantly after the first 60-90 minutes at the tables. There just aren't as many changing dynamics and... to be quite honest, I get a little bored sometimes after about that period of time and will usually do something stupid just to mix things up a bit or for my own entertainment, and more often than not it ends in disaster.

I definitely admire people who can play cash games for hours on end with little-to-no deterioration in their overall level of play. I've learned to accept that I am not that type of player though, and now regularly limit my cash sessions to no more than 90 minutes and often to around 60 and have found my results have improved LOTS since making the change. Using tools like Poker Tracker or Hold Em Manager to constantly look at things like this for weird patterns has helped me a lot over the years. For both tournament and cash game players, you can easily see if there are certain days or times of the day when you do better than others, or certain times when you do horrible. You'll be amazed how easily you can often track these fluctuations in your win rate back to specific things during that day or time that will often help your bottom line.

The second thing I've found playing cash games as opposed to tournaments is there are some significant lifestyle benefits. One of the reasons I quit my regular job to play poker professionally was the freedom to not be a slave to the 9 to 5 (or later) work schedule that is generally accepted in society today. Looking back though, playing tournaments, I was still a slave to the tournament schedule. Sure, I was no longer answering to a boss or punching a clock, but I was still forced to fit within the boundaries of the online tournament schedule to make a living. With cash games I can play whenever I want for as much or as little time as I want, which can be both a blessing and a curse. It's great because it's made it much easier to spend time with my family, go out to social functions that I would have normally missed because they fell during the prime tournament schedule, or just generally have the freedom to go cool off for a while if I just don't feel I'm on my 'A' game.

I don't think I could ever stop playing tournaments on Sundays, but just about every other day of the week I find myself more and more leaning towards playing cash games. This doesn't necessarily mean everyone should do the same, but as my life has changed I've found that branching into other areas of poker have made the parts of my life that are important to me much easier to enjoy and maintain. I guess the point of me sharing this with all of you is that I think it's important to constantly be evaluating our poker game on many different levels. That can be as fundamentally simple as reviewing hand histories or watching a training video. It can also go beyond that to what makes you the happiest at the moment, not just at the tables but away from the tables as well. It's also important to constantly evaluate the ways you can set yourself up for success, from the above example of evaluating the deterioration of my play over periods of time to simply making your poker environment as comfortable (and distraction free) as possible!


- Rizen

---


Eric Lynch has had success in both live and online poker tournaments.  In 2006, finished 24th in the WSOP Main Event for $494,000.  Online, he has an outright victory in the PokerStars Sunday Million for $156,000.  Besides being a sponsored pro at Lock Poker, he is the co-author of "Winning Poker Tournaments One Hand At A Time" along with Jon apestyles Van Fleet and Jon PearlJammer Turner.


Related Articles

Keeping Up with Online Poker Trends

Moving Beyond Harrington

Book Review: Winning Poker Tournaments One Hand at a Time


-------

Winning Poker Tournaments One Hand At A Time
by Rizen, apestyles and PearlJammer




-------




Comments
blizair 

blizair said:

great article rizen. i too am a slave to the tournament schedule. lol.

July 22, 2009 8:41 AM
ronkend 

ronkend said:

^^slave here too

July 22, 2009 9:23 AM
StackMe0ff 

StackMe0ff said:

Training videos are bullshit.

July 22, 2009 12:12 PM
P0KERDUUDE 

P0KERDUUDE said:

nice post. lol stack

July 22, 2009 12:52 PM
Stay_calm86 

Stay_calm86 said:

"I get a little bored sometimes after about that period of time and will usually do something stupid just to mix things up a bit or for my own entertainment, and more often than not it ends in disaster." = my life

great article

July 22, 2009 3:29 PM
awg 

awg said:

What was the point in this article?

July 22, 2009 3:38 PM
duclover 

duclover said:

Great article. Im at a point where I prefer tourneys to cash, but with 2 sons, find it difficult to get the necessary time and focus for MTTs. I think I will start playing more cash also

July 22, 2009 6:13 PM
Naked_Bootleg 

Naked_Bootleg said:

Really is a great read for all you 18-22 year old players out there that don't realize that things will change once you have a family.

July 22, 2009 7:15 PM
Hateflops 

Hateflops said:

Marry me Rizen

July 22, 2009 7:17 PM
EddieO 

EddieO said:

Nice article, I've started playing a lot more cash as well because of the freedom it gives you.  I was so sick of grinding tourneys for 10 hours with no break...thats not the freedom I wanted when I chose to play this game.  I advise everyone to think about playing PLO cash as it is not as boring as NL Cash...be ready for the variance tho!

July 22, 2009 7:36 PM
xPeru 

xPeru said:

As a professional poker player, I've played STTs, MTTs and Cash. Without a shadow of a doubt, cash is the most difficult - but its also the most rewarding. Like you, I find it almost impossible to play well for more than 90 mins at cash - the level of concentration required is phenomenal. MTTs you can play on autopilot for the first two hours at least; STTs, it's the same for the first few blind levels, but the lack of a dynamic with cash means you have to focus 100% of the time.

That's why cash is truly the ultimate form of poker. God knows how the guys that play HU on multi tables do it. I 8 table 6 max and halve my winrate by making tiny lapses. at 4BB/100 playing 25c/50c, one mistake on the river can easily cost 50 big blinds, which means you have to work an extra ~800 hands, just to make up for one error on one hand out of the 600 you play in an hour.

I'm a huge fan Rizen, but your article seems to me to underestimate the scale of the transition from trnys to cash, if you do this for a living.

A winning MTT player eg 40% ROI at $55MTT and below, is going to struggle to beat $25nl 6 max. The first requires a br of $5500, the second a br of $500, but the cash player will suffer less variance and win more money on average.

Done both. Both are hard, but at least with cash you get to pee in a toilet!

August 16, 2009 12:07 AM

P5's Member Blogs
Free Poker Coaching (I Ne...
By Cre8ive - added Nov 18 2009, 02:38 AM
Relationships and Poker
By dtools22 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:15 PM
A Victory and Playing wit...
By sgildea25 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:49 PM
 
Joe Cada is our guest this week!  The newest WSOP Main Event Champion answers questions from P5s viewers.

P5s Podcast, Nov 19, 2009
Thur, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
Jon 'apestyles' Van Fleet is back on the podcast this week to talk about the latest in his poker career.

P5s Podcast, Nov 12, 2009
Thur, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. gboro780 3 1
2. djk123 1 3
3. Jovial Gent 2 4
4. moorman1 8 2
5. Doc Sands 5 6
6. rock3656 6 8
7. govshark2 7 7
8. ImaLuckSac 11 9
9. badpab2 4 19
10. brainwash 10 16
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
Rank PLB
 1. djk123 9022.06
 2. Jovial Gent 8103.48
 3. gboro780 8046.07
 4. rock3656 7746.87
 5. govshark2 7645.73
 6. brainwash 7528.39
 7. 1SickDisease 7466.88
 8. ImaLuckSac 7369.79
 9. hoodini10 7327.57
 10. HITTHEPANDA 7271.41
Go