Poker Articles

 
Sign in | Join
in
     English  |  Deutsch
PlayersOnly
Easy credit card deposits
and soft games!
Sign Up Now!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
PokerStars 
100% Deposit Bonus!
Largest Poker Site!
FullTilt Poker
Non-stop tournament
action all day long!
Sign Up Now!


Poker Articles

Archives

Liar, Liar

By Zpaceman

Poker is a game of deception. Broken down to its simplest logical level, poker is about making decisions based on whether your opponent is telling the truth or is lying. In the film “Liar, Liar” the character played by Jim Carrey cannot help telling the truth even though he wants to lie. At the poker table we can sometimes see a similar phenomenon where your opponent is trying to bluff, but his actions give away the truth. In this article we explore the art of catching our opponents’ bluffs and using this information against them.
The art of catching a bluff is generally based on deducing the meaning of every action given the situation. If we think hard enough about a sequence of actions in a given situation, we can often deduce that these actions do not add up to a strong hand, and are therefore likely to indicate a bluff.


Bluffing happens most often in heads-up situations, and in the context of multi-table tournaments, we experience heads-up confrontations every time a hand is folded around to the small blind. In these blind-on-blind confrontations, any kind of a hand goes up in value and there is a wide scope for bluffing and catching bluffs. I’ll first give a fairly simple example of situation where the actions clearly add-up to a bluff:


http://www.pokerxfactor.com/SH126885/12581_20080420_092640


We are just into the freezeout period of the Pokerstars $100 rebuy and all of the players are fairly deep-stacked. In this tournament, many are looking to make moves. Given the active players at the table, it is rare for a hand to fold around to the blinds, but in this case everyone folds to the SB who, having just been moved to my table, completes the blinds.
With position and a hand as strong as Ad-Qc, I’m looking to build a pot by raising from the BB, but it is quite common for a player to raise in this situation so my opponent could read my raise as any two cards. He calls and we see a very dry flop. I check behind here for pot control, and the turn brings an interesting card that opens up a few draws. I would expect my opponent to bet any drawing hand here so calling with two overcards is pretty straightforward. Then the river misses all draws and he bets again.


I think it is pretty obvious he is bluffing here, although it is possible he is bluffing with the best hand like 55, 66 or 67. Overall, however, I think it is much more likely that he is bluffing with no pair and a missed draw and I call fairly quickly with Ace high.
The key to reading this bluff was my opponent’s check on the flop. If he had any kind of a hand at that stage, I would expect a bet. Given that the turn and river cards did not look like they improved any hand that checks the flop, his bet on the river is a bluff a high enough percentage of the time to justify my call.


Opponents who defend their blinds to your raises are another lucrative source of bluff catching because I find that players who like to defend their blinds also tend to bluff. In this mid-stakes tournament, I make a standard mid-position raise with 99 and run into resistance from the small blind.


http://www.pokerxfactor.com/SH126886/12581_20080420_092910


While I hate to see such a scary flop, my opponent does not bet into it so we get to see another scare card hit the turn. Now there are three cards to a flush plus two overcards on the board and my opponent bets out. That bet made no sense to me. What kind of a hand can check that flop to a pre-flop raise then bet when the flush card hits the turn? I quickly rule out a made flush or any Ace-x hands and put him on a medium pair lower than nines or suited connectors. I was a little concerned he might have a Jack in his hand, but otherwise felt fairly good about calling to see the river. When a fairly harmless off-suit 5 hits he effectively puts me all-in with his bet. That rang my bluff catching alarm bells. Why would he make such a big bet? While making a tough decision I sometimes articulate my thoughts in the chat box. Here’s what I wrote before calling:


Zpaceman said, "weird"

Zpaceman said, "i think ur bluffing"


What made me feel that way were both his sequence of bets and the big bet on the end. With a good made flush he would surely bet less for value, whereas with a pair of Aces or Jacks he would bet less or not at all due to the scary board. The big bet at the end, combined with the earlier betting sequence (note the telling check on the flop again) convinced me that the only hand that made sense was a bluff. It was a much tougher situation than the first example, but I went with my gut instinct and made the call.


I could show you many other examples of “bluff catcher” calls on the river, but the basic tenet with such hands is to search for a weakness in your opponents’ actions that indicate the bluff. Sometimes, however, even if you sense a lot of weakness it is too difficult to make the call on the end. You are playing too loose if you never succumb to a multi-street bluff, but even when you get bluffed you can sometimes gain valuable information from player’s who are too proud or arrogant to keep their bluffs to themselves.


http://www.pokerxfactor.com/SH126888/12581_20080420_093442


Although much of the evidence suggested my overly loose aggressive opponent was bluffing, the river card was just too scary to call. I had checked the turn to induce just such a bluff on either the turn or the river, but when the river produced a fourth spade that was also an overcard I felt my bluff catcher had been counterfeited and I gave up. By showing the bluff, however, my opponent gave away valuable information that enabled the table to play back at him. I later busted him with great satisfaction.


This example introduces an idea about bluff catching that we will now explore further: inducing a bluff. This is commonly known as the rope-a-dope strategy. Given the number of loose aggressive players in the game these days the use of this strategy can win you a lot of chips with very little risk. It can also reverse the power of position by using a weaker position to exploit your opponents’ tendencies.
I’m just going to give you one example of the rope-a-dope play, but these situations arise fairly commonly and can be a major source of chips in tournaments:


http://www.pokerxfactor.com/SH126889/12581_20080420_093606


What makes this situation so ripe is that the stacks are so deep. If the stacks were shallower I would likely be raising Ah-Jd from the BB here, but with 50BB+ stacks I have massive implied odds if I just call. I hit top pair top kicker on a very dry board. If I bet out here I am likely to take down a small pot, but by checking I am inducing a bluff from an over-aggressive player. My opponent perfectly fits this category with a “screen name tell” indicating a loose player.


The pot size bet on the flop was also a significant tell. The board is so dry that there is no value in betting so much with a good made hand like an overpair or a set. Most players will eschew the bet pot button when they have a good hand, but default to it when they are bluffing. I felt that my top pair, top kicker was pretty strong here so I just check-called three streets allowing my opponent to bluff off all his chips when low risk cards hit the turn and river.


Another part of the betting-pattern tell here was the turn and river bet sizing. After betting the pot on the flop, my opponent bet less than half the pot on the turn, despite the fact that a flush draw is now in play. If he really had an 8 then he would be betting more on the turn. His small turn bet enabled him to make a pot-sized bet on the river. This eclectic betting sequence adds up to a bluff rather than a made hand. People with made hands are generally consistent in their betting, not veering from min-raise pre-flop, bet pot on the flop, two-fifths pot on the turn and bet pot on the river.


Catching bluffs can win you a small pot on the river (per the first example) or a big pot (per the second example) and can be a good source of extra chips if you simply take the time to analyze the action to deduce whether your opponent is lying or not. Inducing bluffs can be an even bigger source of chips as over-aggressive opponents can sometimes just give you all of their chips if you give them enough rope to hang themselves. Catching a few bluffs can give you an enormous sense of satisfaction in a game and also earn you the right to call your opponent “Liar, Liar.”

Published Apr 21 2008, 08:47 PM

Comments
 

steve said:

I saw this movie once, it was called Liar Liar.  And the message was, don't lie.  And that was a smart movie.

April 21, 2008 10:41 PM
 

TheFirm53 said:

really enjoyed your piece, thanks for including the hand replayer it really adds a lot to the article. No way you could call that bet in the third hand.

April 21, 2008 10:44 PM
 

FouTight said:

Very nice article. Thank you for your many contributions.

April 21, 2008 10:48 PM
 

openartery said:

Thanks for another great article.  I also enjoyed the replayer and thought that it added a lot to the article.  Best of luck at the tables.

April 21, 2008 11:51 PM
 

TheConArtist said:

The key to reading this bluff was my opponent’s check on the flop. If he had any kind of a hand at that stage, I would expect a bet.

That was the first hand. Do you really think if he had a strong hand on the flop he would donk into you after limp calling? I think quite the opposite, he would check here a very large percentage of the time with a made hand. Not to say i think the A high call is bad but the logic behind your read of him bluffing is flawed imo.

April 22, 2008 12:48 AM
 

kice32 said:

can anyone explain to me how "ILUVBIGCHICKS" is a loose screen name player tell?

April 22, 2008 1:03 AM
 

Cmac said:

Very innovative article, good stuff Z

April 22, 2008 1:45 AM
 

chiktzbaao said:

..played a pretty bigpot with "iluvhairywetchicks" these days..instantly called his riverpush with QT-high and send him back 2 where he belongs!NB PERVERT!

April 22, 2008 2:54 AM
 

rexmundi1337 said:

good stuff.  

April 22, 2008 9:12 AM
 

Kenny Rap said:

so you expect people to lead into the preflop raiser every time they have a hand? i strongly disagree

April 22, 2008 11:16 AM
 

chevanater said:

good article, thank you! Please keep them coming

April 22, 2008 11:42 AM
 

KidDelicious said:

that was one the best articles i've read on here.  good job sir.

April 22, 2008 11:50 AM
 

NoVacancy22 said:

Agree with everything you have explained, however I do feel that the JJ hand was misplayed. I think you should've been less passive on the flop.  A reraise on the flop could've told you more information and also allowed for you to take down a solid pot. But, I also don't know your reads on the player at the time.....

April 22, 2008 12:52 PM
 

the_snail03 said:

it sounds to me that u convince yourself into a call(that villain is bluffing) alot.

April 22, 2008 1:01 PM
 

jenkinsenter said:

I agree with those who said that the idea that the SB would have bet a made hand into you is flawed. It was the one part of the article that stood out to me as odd. Much like you checked your JJ into the preflop raiser on a rag board in hand 3, I don't see why tmay420 wouldn't check top pair, weak kicker, or a smaller pair and try to keep the pot small. I'm guessing you would have raised his bet there 90% of the time, and he knows that.

I think you played the hand well, I just didn't agree with that comment. This is especially true in the mid to lower limits, where EVERYONE checks to the raiser, whether they flopped a monster or just 2nd pair. They have little regard for draws or giving their opponents free cards. It's why I'm impressed you called the river with 99 against the KQ bluff. The preflop call with Ax, then check/bet/bet move with top pair is very common in mid to lower buy-in tourneys.

April 22, 2008 1:21 PM
 

theoldman999 said:

I thought the article opened up some additional avenues of thought to a very important issue in poker. I thought some decisions were "not what I would of done" but it was a good article on a good subject. Thx.

April 22, 2008 2:55 PM
 

TonyBlaze said:

Great article in thought and sturcture. Kenny Rap is 100% right though Z. This is what came to mind to me as well. I think you could connect the dots here in some other way though for that hand perhaps in terms of your read on your opponents previous betting patterns.

I think this structure and the use of the hand player is a much more powerful article. Despite the one arguable error in analysis props to you for bringing imo greatly improved material.

Respect

April 22, 2008 5:26 PM
 

daggerman said:

Kice32,

generally any player that has all cap letters it

is said they are very loose agg/maniac

April 22, 2008 7:53 PM
 

conan99 said:

gr8 article.....again  the hand replayer was an awsome idea..oh btw way wanna mentor me???    15% plus

April 23, 2008 12:27 PM
 

fish-lover said:

Great examples!! thx!!

May 28, 2008 9:12 AM

P5's Member Blogs
bankroll project...
By carnage78 - added 10/08/2008
Poker Player Dream's
By newyorkbadaz - added 10/11/2008
Pay the Cost, Be the Boss...
By The Maven - added 10/12/2008
 
WCOOP Main Event Winner Carter 'ckingusc' King and P5s Live Reporter Court Harrington are our guests this week on the P5s Podcast.

P5s Podcast, Sep 25, 2008
Thur, 25 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST
Long time online winner and popular P5er Dan 'B_O_K_E' Bokesch is our newest guest on the P5s Podcast.

P5s Podcast, Sep 18, 2008
Thur, 18 Sep 2008 12:00:00 EST
 
Vivek Flogs The Bear
2008-10-14 16:18:47
Kings Into Aces Again
2008-10-14 15:33:09
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. AJKHoosier1 1 1
2. moorman1 2 2
3. djk123 3 3
4. shaundeeb 6 6
5. P0KERPR033 8 4
6. BeL0WaB0Ve 11 8
7. ender555 7 15
8. USCphildo 14 9
9. gboro780 16 7
10. Tomgus456 10 17
Last update: 10/08/2008
P5s Sortable Rankings
Rank PLB
 1. ryanbluf 6449.31
 2. Mr_BigQueso 3460.29
 3. Shaaarrrp 2283.11
 4. Hazmat2001 1468.85
 5. Fajzher 1432.98
 6. cactusjak9 1292.59
 7. hustler2727 1040.22
 8. Raf1318 914.71
 9. spudd69 824.88
 10. dirtdogjd 584.73