Play Online Poker
 

Off Topic Post

 
Sign in | Join
in
PlayersOnly
Easy credit card deposits
and soft games!
Sign Up Now!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
PokerStars 
100% Deposit Bonus!
Largest Poker Site!
FullTilt Poker
Non-stop tournament
action all day long!
Sign Up Now!

Off Topic


Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site!
Full Tilt · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog

   

Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why?
By norcaljeff on 05-15-2008 11:58 AM

looool at the dems "outrage". methinks they doth protest too much, eh? Orrrrr maybe they know they're appeasing pieces of shit that only embolden the enemy with their anti-american bulsh.

Then again, maybe pretending Bush lied to go to war for oil and halliburton and empire (and made them vote for it. and got france and germany and clinton and gore and kerry to "lie" lolz. etc etc etc) doesn't make the us into the bad guy. And maybe saying we should end the "occupation" of iraq won't chalk up a victory for the terrorists. Maybe "We defeated the mighty US. And look how fucking easy it was! we just had to kill a few troops and wait. The dems and turncoat repubs will do all the work for us. Thanks media/dems/rinos!" isn't a good recruiting tool. And maybe showing how much of a paper tiger we are won't encourage attacks, like it "didn't" before. hmm...I seem to remember that "paper tiger" quote from somewhere. I wonder where.

please note that Bush made a perfectly logical and correct statement, if that matters.

Obama Takes Issue With Bush Foreign Policy Speech

Share var addthis_pub = 'abcnews';

May 15, 2008 9:57 AM

Ed OKeefe

-->

ABC News' Ed O'Keefe Reports: The Obama campaign is taking issue with a comment President Bush made while speaking to the Knesset on the 60th anniversary of Israel's statehood.

"Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," the President said to the country's legislative body, "We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: 'Lord, if only I could have talked to Hitler, all of this might have been avoided.' We have an obligation to call this what it is –- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."

Watch video of Bush's comments on terror HERE.

In a statement, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., shot across the bow: "It is sad that President Bush would use a speech to the Knesset on the 6Oth anniversary of Israel's independence to launch a false political attack. It is time to turn the page on eight years of policies that have strengthened Iran and failed to secure America or our ally Israel. Instead of tough talk and no action, we need to do what Kennedy, Nixon and Reagan did and use all elements of American power -- including tough, principled, and direct diplomacy - to pressure countries like Iran and Syria. George Bush knows that I have never supported engagement with terrorists, and the President's extraordinary politicization of foreign policy and the politics of fear do nothing to secure the American people or our stalwart ally Israel."

ABC News' White House troops point out that the President has made similar statements in the past and Bush did not specifically cite Obama by name, though he did reference Sen. William Borah's immortal reaction upon hearing that Hitler had invaded Poland and begun World War II, something he has not highlighted in the past.

"(The President) has said similar things before," a White House official told ABC News' Martha Raddatz. "But it is in reference to a number of people, think Carter, others who have engaged in this or suggested it."

White House spokesperson Dana Perino was asked if Bush's line was a slam against Obama and she insisted, "It is not."

"I understand that when you are running for office sometimes you think the world revolves around you. That is not always true and it is not true in this case," Perino added, though the White House is keenly aware of how such statements might play during a heated political season and has steadfastly avoided commenting on the 2008 race.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Cali., did not take kindly to the remarks calling Bush's statement "beneath the dignity of the office of the president" in her weekly press conference on Capitol Hill.

Pelosi alluded that presumptive Republican nominee Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., should distance himself from Bush's assertions in Israel, repeatedly saying "any sensible person" would.

In an ABC News interview with the President in April, Bush told Raddatz, "I've said the president's job is to solve these issues diplomatically first and foremost. But, of course options need to stay on the table."

Vice President Dick Cheney has been more direct in criticizing the 2008 Democratic candidates, although still not by name.

"The idea that we can walk away from Iraq is, I think, terribly damaging on its face, and to say that, 'well that's the only way we can get the Iraqis to take on responsibility,' I don't believe that's the case," Cheney said in a March interview with ABC News.

Without addressing the Democratic candidates specifically, the vice president said those who want to pull out of Iraq are "seriously misguided," adding that the presidential candidates would be risking an attack on the homeland if U.S. forces withdrew, and arguing that terrorists would find safe havens in other countries.

Sens. Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., both have said they'd withdraw U.S. forces from Iraq if elected president. Sen. McCain has advocated a continued U.S. presence in Iraq until security and political situations improve.

When asked if he was talking about any candidate in particular, Cheney said, "I am talking about any candidate for high office who believes the solution for our problem in that part of the world is to walk away from the commitments that we've made in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere."

ABC News' Ann Compton, Jon Garcia, Sunlen Miller, and Martha Raddatz contributed to this report.

cliffnotes: it's not safe to vote dem.
 
 
 

Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By darkpoker12 on 05-15-2008 12:19 PM

Man If only I could read. 


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By Willywoo on 05-15-2008 12:27 PM

That speech made me laugh.  Especially the part where he sees all democratic countries in the middle east and religious tolerance, etc., all within 60 years.

Oh well, I guess it sounds good.  "What's so funny about peace, love and understanding?"

 

While we are on the issue of democrats and republicans you should take a look at the new 2008 Farm Bill.  What a piece of work our legislators put together here.

As one congressman said proudly, "This legislation has something for everyone".

O'rly?


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By norcaljeff on 05-15-2008 12:45 PM

what do you have against Hope & Change? but I guess hoping for ME peace is a pipe dream. like the berlin wall falling or the soviet union breaking up. we all knew that shit was never happenening.

re farm bill. it does have something for everyone. which as you know is the problem. Personally, I wouldn't have thought we need to spend more than half of what we spend on defense for farming. tractors must be hella expensive or something


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By tekiller on 05-15-2008 12:53 PM

this bill i'll bet doesn't help my uncles one iota. most of those bills that get passed get sucked up by the corporate farms and well try to outbid a corprate farm at a livestock auction.

and jeff dis the dems all you want but all you support is mccain a republicrat.


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By norcaljeff on 05-15-2008 1:00 PM

if your uncle makes less that 650k the dems say he can have subsidies. if that helps. if he made under 200k bush's plan would have allowed him to get subsidies, but luckily the dems stepped up for the "little guys". gl to your hopefully rich uncle's accountant!

and better a republicrat than a corrupt socialist immfo


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By tekiller on 05-15-2008 1:06 PM

yea ya got a point on the socialist but socialism or war with iran? i think i'll take socialism over my fears of starting another world war. altho i'd rather take Ron Paul gtfo of the middle east and let israel turn it into a glass plate.


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By darkpoker12 on 05-15-2008 1:17 PM

socialism is never an option, however erasing Iran off the map sounds alot better then socialism. 


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By woertink on 05-15-2008 1:33 PM

how can anyone defend gw bush...


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By Underdog34 on 05-15-2008 1:39 PM

Sometimes your reasoning betrays a certain amount of fuckheadedness.

Expressing outrage at an outrageous comment doesn't validate the comment.

If someone accused President Bush of being a serial rapist and his supporters defended him with outrage, that outrage would not be evidence that he must really be a serial rapist.

Biden pretty much nailed it:  "It's bullshit."


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By digthatfunk on 05-15-2008 1:43 PM

 i didnt really read the OP yet, but honestly, as much as travel, especially between countries/entirely dif. civilizations is becoming more common, and interracial love/mating is more accepted, we're getting closer to a point where soon races will begin to lose so many of the extreme differences. i believe the three "categories" are mongoloid(asians, some far eastern europeans), negroid(i dont remember if this is right, referring to people from africa/ "cradle of civilization), and caucasoid(anglos, saxons, etc.) will begin to merge into maybe three still distinct yet far less differing, or perhaps even two, groups. and sometime, if the human race doesnt end, it will be impossible for there to be anything but one main group.

  obv not saying this will happen in our lifetime, or even our great great grandkids. but if humans stay alive and remain on earth, it will pretty much be impossible to not end up with one race. and one race= a lot more chance at peace, since most war can be boiled down to simply racism or religionism(word?)


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By MadProfesor on 05-15-2008 1:44 PM

SoCalDrew >>> norcaljeff

Surprise


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By norcaljeff on 05-15-2008 1:46 PM

who accused who of what now? no, it's like saying "serial rape is wrong" and then having scha jump up and scream that it's bullshit for you to accuse him of serial rape.


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By norcaljeff on 05-15-2008 1:47 PM

repost, but thanks for trying?


Re:Hit A Little Close to Home, Dems? I Wonder Why? In reply to
By MadProfesor on 05-15-2008 1:49 PM

oh sorry, i thought i was in the Mr Blonde nighmare Repost thread, my bad. Geeked

 
Return to Top
Page 1 of 2 (18 items) 1 2 Next >


P5's Member Blogs
Is This What Poker Will C...
By Cre8ive - added Nov 13 2008, 09:04 AM
$5.20 Turbo Double or Not...
By jimjeff99 - added Nov 13 2008, 06:42 PM
Weekend Update 'Double Sh...
By Mephisto - added Nov 15 2008, 03:08 PM
 
This week's podcast focuses on new UIGEA regulations that are scheduled to be enacted in January 2009.  John Pappas of the PPA and Jeff Sandman of the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative join us.

P5s Podcast, Nov 13, 2008
Thur, 13 Nov 2008 12:00:00 EST
This week's podcast features Jay 'SEABEAST' Kinkade (ranked #27), Monthly PLB winner for October '08, and Jamie Horowitz, Senior Producer of Content Development for ESPN.

P5s Podcast, Nov 6, 2008
Thur, 6 Nov 2008 12:00:00 EST
 
Little Wins!
2008-11-12 04:36:16
Both Jonathan's Double, Not Much Changes
2008-11-12 03:42:55
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. AJKHoosier1 1 1
2. djk123 2 3
3. moorman1 5 2
4. shaundeeb 3 5
5. gboro780 4 4
6. TheRealPokerccini 7 10
7. ender555 10 9
8. P0KERPR033 17 6
9. eisenhower1 11 12
10. breeth 6 21
P5s Sortable Rankings
Rank PLB
 1. ryanbluf 6223.95
 2. Mr_BigQueso 3670.30
 3. Shaaarrrp 2217.91
 4. MAFinest22 1901.72
 5. Hazmat2001 1664.46
 6.