Off Topic Post

excellent rebutal! err..

ty?

ding.......oh oh oh it is al-Qaeda (lol, just wanna be the spelling police, in honor of the spelling bee.  i know it can be spelled like 98 different ways too and thats one of them), but i agree that we can not pull out of iraq now.  pulling out is going to hurt our image more than staying there.  however, if someone wants to pull out they are not a POS (unless you are this person).

I am drunk -errr- buzzed. that count? ps. pigalet is hawt. frf if he doesn't agrii

Excuse me, but, what, pray tell, are our current mission objectives?  And God help you if you say "Stop the terrorists."  That's not a military objective.  "Capture that hill" is a military objective.  "Force this army to surrender" is a military objective.  "Level Hiroshima with an A-bomb" is a military objective.  "Stop the terrorists" is a full-time political commitment requiring intelligence, anti-and-counter-terrorism, and a plethora of other tactics.  You can't "win" that; you can't "beat" terrorism.  If Al Qaeda in Iraq and Sadr surrendered tomorrow, you haven't "won", because some other jackass would take up the mantle.  Fuck, peace for the most part reigns in Northern Ireland, and there are STILL jackasses running around calling themselves IRA in some form or another.

Anyone who things you can "win" whatever is happening in Iraq the same way you can win a war is dishonest for political purposes, or a fucking moron.  And that's coming from someone who SUPPORTED the war, and OPPOSES full withdrawal. 

uh yea they do have you watched any of the videos of iraqi citizens asking us to gtfo?
do some research man before you talk about something you know little about.

guess im a POS too ... all soliders out of Vietnam2 immed pls.

norcaljeff,

You really think that you can kill them all.  It cannot be done.  they will always be there, or somewhere.  How long has the US been there.  How much progress have they made?  Even if it does get under control, the day after the US pulls out it will just start again.  I just have a hard time believing that it is worth it to sacrifice thousands of lives to make a little bit of progress. 

ira bomb anyone lately?

     Sean Penn

         F.A.G
Last year I went to Iraq. Before Team America showed up, it was a happy place. They had flowery meadows and rainbow skies, and rivers made of chocolate, where the children danced and laughed and played with gumdrop smiles.

so we should, what? wait till they come here? I don't understand the "can't win" aspect.

By whose definition?  If "stopping terrorists" is the definition of victory, then if some fucktard kills a couple kids in a shopping mall tomorrow and calls himself Provisional Real Awesome Totally Super-Cool IRA, then, by your own definition, Ireland lost, cause you didn't stop 'em all!  Making "stopping terrorists" a military win/lose objective gives terrorists far more power than they deserver.  Why do you love terrorists so much, norcaljeff?  Are you a terrorist, or just a terrorist-sympathizer?

Global counter-terrorist should not have the same rules as The Game.

P.S.  Everyone loses.

loool. wtf?

well, in that case... proceed :)

hey, 51,000 more soldiers and you are right! unless you meant that pulling out would result in the murder of millions of innocents. then you would be right