Poker Discussion
|

|
Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site! CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog
dont kill the messanger...just something to drink on tonight.. http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=12097244&page=0&fpart=4&vc=1
obv i dont think its true..i felt like starting some fire on p5
|
|
|
|
|
LMAO - how can you fail to make quota if you can see everyone's cards. What a load of rubbish.
|
|
|
|
what page of the thread are the screenshots on?
|
|
|
|

I had to crop the images a little bit so they would fit in the post. There is 2 more that I will post as soon as i get them edited.
|
|
|
|
103 hands.... wow. I've read almost the whole two plus two thread and most of them don;t really have the slightest idea about how to find a cheater. You can;t prove anything in 103 hands except that you don;t know much about poker statistics,
|
|
|
Btw the best was when one guy posted that it was impossible to run as good as the guy was in 500 hands. Ummm take a random 2000 players and you will see several that run well and look like cheaters. Some poker players really are idiots and just run lucky.
BTW not saying that this guy isn;t cheating, but looking at the other thread on two plus two it was just a waste of time. show me some real evidence
|
|
|
|
river agg infinite over 30 or 28 hands... of which he probably only played a few rivers anyways.
I've had infinite aggresion on river for over 100 hands before in single sessions, its not really that hard.
|
|
|
northstar...your an idiot...NOBODY can run that good over multiple session playing high stakes poker. Combine that with the fact that he NEVER calls the river...its either a raise or fold. Why do u think that is? Its because he knows for a fact whether or not he has the best hand.
Just take a look at some of the hand histories posted over at 2+2. You think he can pick off EVERY bluff and play 3rd pair like its the nuts because he is in fact the poker god himself? No, he sees the cards and its SF OBV.
|
|
|
lol 100 hands? do you have any idea what average bb varaince is for 100 hands? Anyways the fact that you don;t understand this makes me question your understanding of short term results. You should know that 30 hands is worthless for calculating any river aggresion.
There were about three hand histories posted which just proved that he might be an idiot. There were also people up on him.
BTW I'm not gonna bother responsding to any more of your posts since you seem to be convinced I or anyone else who sees wholes in this story is an idiot.
|
|
|
|
btw I made a post weeks ago explaining that about 1 out of every 20 losing players will be a winning player after 20k hands. With that in mind think about how many losing players are winners in short term
|
|
|
have you ever played less than 200 hands and won more than 20 buy ins?
and also northstar have you ever played 500 hands and had a VPIP of 94%?
|
|
|
won 10 buy ins before in 150 hands but I was playing probably only 30% of hands. You just answered your own question btw the guy is playing 94% he is either gonna win tons of money or lose tons of money. If I played 94% of hands I could run that hot yes... Sure it's unlikely to run that hot but not nearly as crazy as you think especially when you factor in that someone is bound to do this across thousands of players.
I never said the guy was a good player (hence the 94%). Just that these stats far from prove he is cheating. And when people cite river aggresion really makes me wonder if they know how to intepret these numbers. Why don;t people post entire hand histories for the guy? Why just one or two hands? You need way more info then what people are posting to be so sure he is chaeting.
|
|
|
|
|
PocketFives.com Rankings
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|