Poker Discussion Post

 
Sign in | Join
in
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Poker Discussion


Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site!
CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog

   

AP Resolution
N 82 50 24 (Cayman Islands) 5,561 Posts. Joined 06-12-2005.
10-20-2007 7:42 PM

Two people will be implicated here, you can probably guess who.  One is going to be removed from online poker forever and one is going be removed for a fair amount of time.

I was asked not to post specifics and that AP's statement is going to be detailed and is going to be released Sunday morning.
 
 
 

DexterCain (United States) 13,347 Posts. Joined 08-24-2005.
10-20-2007 7:44 PM - In reply to

ownd

Willywoo (Djibouti) 11,444 Posts. Joined 01-30-2006.
10-20-2007 7:44 PM - In reply to

Removed by whom?

And it does not resolve the problem of how a rogue employee/owner exec or whatever could pull off something like this.

There were apparently insufficient internal controls at AP to prevent this sort of thing or it is more than two people involved.

In NCAA terms there was a "lack of institutional control".

The bigger picture, especially for US legislators, is whether the security, regulation and control is adequate.  If this is not resolved, less restrictive regulation in the US is a pipe dream.


Nice job btw.

N 82 50 24 (Cayman Islands) 5,561 Posts. Joined 06-12-2005.
10-20-2007 7:45 PM - In reply to

Gaming Commission as I understand it.

jesterwords (United States) 14,142 Posts. Joined 01-07-2006.
10-20-2007 7:47 PM - In reply to

I'm interested to say the least.

gungiclonepot (United States) 104 Posts. Joined 05-02-2007.
10-20-2007 7:47 PM - In reply to

harshaments

Willywoo (Djibouti) 11,444 Posts. Joined 01-30-2006.
10-20-2007 7:51 PM - In reply to

Now we're talking. 

If KGC can take control and enforce its regulations then it can show the world that there is some form of regulation and enforcement.

CrazyMarco 183 Posts. Joined 12-04-2005.
10-20-2007 8:00 PM - In reply to

I am really glad that nat, adanthar and others kept pursuing this huge problem that was obviously going on at AP. Nice job not stopping with there constant lies saying that no cheating ever took place. Very nice work everyone and Im glad to see they finally admitted to the huge problem that was going on with their company and I really reallly can't wait to see what there statement says tomorrow.

Willywoo (Djibouti) 11,444 Posts. Joined 01-30-2006.
10-20-2007 8:05 PM - In reply to

The key here for me is that the KGC can and will exercise their power over licensees.

Kind of a Marbury v. Madison of online poker.

I hope this is what is happening.

5aces5 (United States) 71 Posts. Joined 03-04-2007.
10-20-2007 8:12 PM - In reply to

I am sorry, but "banning" somebody forever is lame. Anyone who wants to can open up an account under another name. Why don't they just send him to stand in the corner? They should pull all his hand histories and make him give the money he stole back to its rightful owners. This is the only outcome that could make this right.

dealace1 (Canada) 680 Posts. Joined 01-23-2007.
10-20-2007 8:16 PM - In reply to

Maybe Nat can get some rest until morning. Great job putting it all together.

hicakipe (United States) 141 Posts. Joined 02-04-2007.
10-20-2007 8:21 PM - In reply to

This still doesn't address the issue of AP's cover-up and phony investigation.


boozhwaa (United States) 1,087 Posts. Joined 01-22-2005.
10-20-2007 8:22 PM - In reply to

Good to know. Thanks for all your efforts Nat.

N 82 50 24 (Cayman Islands) 5,561 Posts. Joined 06-12-2005.
10-20-2007 8:23 PM - In reply to

I'm assuming the statement tomorrow will say that the two people high up in the matter are responsible for the coverup.

xTEDFORRESTx (Romania) 2,213 Posts. Joined 05-21-2007.
10-20-2007 8:23 PM - In reply to

So how does banning two people fix the problem that their security could not detect the most obvious type of cheating, or that chip dumping went on for days? 

Banning two people fixes the fact that the company lied?

I still don't see how banning two individuals makes your money safe on this site, unless those two people were the entire security team.
 

 
Return to Top
Page 1 of 6 (89 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »


P5's Member Blogs
Going For Triple Crown...
By Cre8ive - added Nov 04 2009, 02:56 PM
The New Grind Begins
By dtools22 - added Nov 03 2009, 11:22 AM
November starts well
By MakeMeMaster - added Nov 03 2009, 08:51 AM
 
Jordan 'scarface_79' Smith joins us to discuss his 10th place finish in the WSOP Main Event and his other recent large cashes.

P5s Podcast, Nov 5, 2009
Thur, 5 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
Ian Ramsey, local counsel for the Interactive Gaming Council, discusses a recent hearing in the Kentucky Supreme Court regarding the potential seizure of online gaming domain names.

P5s Podcast, Oct 29, 2009
Thur, 29 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. gboro780 2 1
2. djk123 1 4
3. Jovial Gent 3 3
4. moorman1 5 2
5. Doc Sands 7 6
6. rock3656 4 9
7. govshark2 12 7
8. shaundeeb 18 5
9. ImaLuckSac 11 13
10. Believer82 17 11
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
Rank PLB
 1. djk123 9312.08
 2. gboro780 8544.39
 3. Jovial Gent 8459.52
 4. rock3656 7971.03
 5. brainwash 7571.79
 6. ImaLuckSac 7509.52
 7. hoodini10 7465.48
 8. govshark2 7429.53
 9. TravestyFund 7278.15
 10. Believer82 7255.12
Go