Poker Discussion Post

 
Sign in | Join
in
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Poker Discussion


Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site!
CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog

   

Done with denial.
HoldemJunkie (United States) 222 Posts. Joined 07-19-2007.
07-03-2009 4:34 PM

Okay guys I'm sick of thinking I'm still good at poker. I used to be a winning player but times have changed and I cannot adapt like others tend to. What style is working the most these days probably aggresive? Would anyone be willing to help me out and talk through some things with me?

 
 
 

U2ForNow (United States) 273 Posts. Joined 02-22-2009.
07-04-2009 1:20 PM - In reply to

Ok... I don't care if I get flammed.

When you are running bad or as I believe in your case just not having played enough, have dish-a-prin (lmao) and.. TIGHTEN UP!

Play in posistion.
Learn to read the board.
Study your opponents. (Do not call an all in when you have 2nd or 3rd best against a TAG player)

Im sure there is more but that is a LOT for someone to work on.


OhAaT (United States) 1,156 Posts. Joined 07-25-2005.
07-04-2009 1:40 PM - In reply to

TiltinShoes: 
OhAaT: 

In my opinion, nitting it the fuck up is the way to go.  Variance is low, and with everyone trying to always be aggressive, you still get action when you get the goods.  It's been said before poker is always on a pendulum going back and forth, and I tend to think more passive play letting others bluff their chips, has been working a lot for me.

This is just a generalization, as i'll be the aggressor if everyone at the table is playing tight etc. 



Don't get too nitty... you will never have enough chips to win a tournament this way unless you get run the ef over by the deck.  BTW I do tend to agree that rocking up may be a good adjustment to th eway the game is played right now, but you still have to be agressive.  Whatever style you choose be it tight or loose, agression is always a key. Most people don't understand the difference between LAG and TAG.  In both you are in there raising, not calling much.  LAG just means your starting hand requirements are looser, not that you are flatting then calling flops.  You are still only opening generally, then trying to put opponents to the test. 


I agree with what you say completely.  By nitting it up, I don't mean to have lack of aggression all together.  Still have to raise when you do decide to play a hand, and still be willing to make continuation bet, or proper reraises, based on the situation, just a lot more selectively then the blind aggression a lot of the players possess.

U2ForNow (United States) 273 Posts. Joined 02-22-2009.
07-04-2009 1:53 PM - In reply to

OhAaT: 
TiltinShoes: 
OhAaT: 

In my opinion, nitting it the fuck up is the way to go.  Variance is low, and with everyone trying to always be aggressive, you still get action when you get the goods.  It's been said before poker is always on a pendulum going back and forth, and I tend to think more passive play letting others bluff their chips, has been working a lot for me.

This is just a generalization, as i'll be the aggressor if everyone at the table is playing tight etc. 



Don't get too nitty... you will never have enough chips to win a tournament this way unless you get run the ef over by the deck.  BTW I do tend to agree that rocking up may be a good adjustment to th eway the game is played right now, but you still have to be agressive.  Whatever style you choose be it tight or loose, agression is always a key. Most people don't understand the difference between LAG and TAG.  In both you are in there raising, not calling much.  LAG just means your starting hand requirements are looser, not that you are flatting then calling flops.  You are still only opening generally, then trying to put opponents to the test. 


I agree with what you say completely.  By nitting it up, I don't mean to have lack of aggression all together.  Still have to raise when you do decide to play a hand, and still be willing to make continuation bet, or proper reraises, based on the situation, just a lot more selectively then the blind aggression a lot of the players possess.


100%. I can't remember where I heard it but it has served me well. More live than online but. Re-raise. "Re-raising will not cost you money. It will save you money". Think about it. This doesn't mean to always shove.

Someone that always C-bets 100% of the time will often fold to your re-raise if they have no piece of it. When you are last to act and you have re-raised his C-bet, you will have all the information you need when it's time to act.

The other thing is... TRUST YOUR GUT!
 
Return to Top
Page 2 of 2 (18 items) < Previous 1 2


P5's Member Blogs
Free Poker Coaching (I Ne...
By Cre8ive - added Nov 18 2009, 02:38 AM
Relationships and Poker
By dtools22 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:15 PM
A Victory and Playing wit...
By sgildea25 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:49 PM
 
Joe Cada is our guest this week!  The newest WSOP Main Event Champion answers questions from P5s viewers.

P5s Podcast, Nov 19, 2009
Thur, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
Jon 'apestyles' Van Fleet is back on the podcast this week to talk about the latest in his poker career.

P5s Podcast, Nov 12, 2009
Thur, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. gboro780 3 1
2. djk123 1 3
3. Jovial Gent 2 4
4. moorman1 8 2
5. Doc Sands 5 6
6. rock3656 6 8
7. govshark2 7 7
8. ImaLuckSac 11 9
9. badpab2 4 19
10. brainwash 10 16
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
Rank PLB
 1. djk123 9022.06
 2. Jovial Gent 8103.48
 3. gboro780 8046.07
 4. rock3656 7746.87
 5. govshark2 7645.73
 6. brainwash 7528.39
 7. 1SickDisease 7466.88
 8. ImaLuckSac 7369.79
 9. hoodini10 7327.57
 10. HITTHEPANDA 7271.41
Go