Poker Discussion Post

I agree completely with your last sentence.

As far as your first few, the problem is that "cheating" is defined by what the site says is "cheating". If you read the agreement, it just says people can't have more than one account. It does not address taking over someone else's account in a tournament after you bust out. So yes, your hypothetical doesn't seem to me to be prohibited by party's rules.

I'm truly shocked by this information....I truly believed JJ's story about Granny.

I dunno, I think it sounds like you are looking for loopholes.  Loopholes are bullshit.  Like the steroids argument in baseball of "They weren't outlawed in the collective bargaining agreement," the defense of "yeah it was cheating but we found a way around it" can't fly either.  If you need to be told not to take steroids, or in this case, if you need to be told you should not be playing the same tourny twice on two accounts then I think we can end the discussion there, cuz why bother?


I don't think this is just a minor issue, and I'm not willing to just wag a scolding finger and say 'ok, you found a loophole nice job exploiting it.'

the only people who are trying to quiet it down / justify it are probably doing multiple accounts as well