Poker Discussion Post

 
Sign in | Join
in
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
Carbon Poker 
Get 30% Rakeback
$15,000 Rake Chase!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Poker Discussion


Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site!
CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog

   

For those that they should move up in stakes to avoid bad players getting lucky against them....
FabulousTexan (United States) 312 Posts. Joined 04-12-2006.
08-09-2008 2:24 PM

I'm not posting this as a bad beat but as the answer to the frustrated posts from the low limit player who's getting killed by opponents sucking out and making horrible plays.

The post usually goes something like this... Hand history where the hero bets 3-5x with preflop with a good hand. Some donkey either calls or even pushes over the top with a mediocre pair, weak ace, or any 2 suited. Hero bets to deny the draw, villain chases. Villain hits a miralce river and busts the hero.

Hero is amazed how such bad play is rewarded.

Hero posts here wondering if he should move up in limits because people, the logic goes, better players won't make dumb calls preflop and won't chase draws to the river regardless of pot odds.

I understand the frustration because I started playing the $5 SnGs and worked my way up. I remember becoming enraged a few occassions when some donkey made a mind numbingly horrid play and was rewarded. And, yeah, sometimes they come in series.

You're looking for answers and the rationalization is playing "players that know how to play right" won't make stupid plays and suckout.

PokerStars Game #19486021738: Tournament #101111438, $50+$5 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2008/08/09 - 14:46:00 (ET)
Table '101111438 1' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: ChampsPoker (880 in chips)
Seat 2: bluebuilder (2300 in chips)
Seat 3: npfd14 (1420 in chips)
Seat 4: roeydo (1500 in chips)
Seat 5: al monaco (1480 in chips)
Seat 6: elwayrulz (1420 in chips)
Seat 7: dj26xxx (1500 in chips)
Seat 8: johneecanuck (1500 in chips)
Seat 9: TexnNOcala (1500 in chips)
npfd14: posts small blind 10
roeydo: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to TexnNOcala [Ah Kd]
al monaco: folds
elwayrulz: calls 20
dj26xxx: folds
johneecanuck: folds
TexnNOcala: raises 80 to 100
ChampsPoker: folds
bluebuilder: calls 100
npfd14: folds
roeydo: folds
elwayrulz: calls 80
*** FLOP *** [Kh 8h Ac]
elwayrulz: checks
TexnNOcala: bets 185
bluebuilder: calls 185
elwayrulz: folds
*** TURN *** [Kh 8h Ac] [2c]
TexnNOcala: bets 425
bluebuilder: calls 425
*** RIVER *** [Kh 8h Ac 2c] [2h]
TexnNOcala: checks
bluebuilder: bets 740
TexnNOcala: raises 50 to 790 and is all-in
bluebuilder: calls 50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
TexnNOcala: shows [Ah Kd] (two pair, Aces and Kings)
bluebuilder: shows [Jh 4h] (a flush, King high)
TexnNOcala said, "DEAR GOID"
bluebuilder collected 3130 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3130 | Rake 0
Board [Kh 8h Ac 2c 2h]
Seat 1: ChampsPoker folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: bluebuilder (button) showed [Jh 4h] and won (3130) with a flush, King high
Seat 3: npfd14 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: roeydo (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: al monaco folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: elwayrulz folded on the Flop
Seat 7: dj26xxx folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: johneecanuck folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: TexnNOcala showed [Ah Kd] and lost with two pair, Aces and Kings

The point here isn't to whine about a bad beat but just point out that there is horrible play at levels higher than $5 and $10.

As frustrating as it is at the moment, long term you should understand that guys making horrible plays will pay you.

If you keep playing good poker you will build your bankroll and your skill will improve to where you move up because you've got the bankroll and the game to compete with better players.

Moving up because you want to avoid bad players? Not the answer.

 
 
 

muck_AA (Canada) 495 Posts. Joined 04-14-2008.
08-09-2008 2:27 PM - In reply to

fold river, why else would he call u down all the way and bet that river without have making his house or flush?


RichardHurtz (Russian Federation) 2,196 Posts. Joined 05-05-2007.
08-09-2008 2:32 PM - In reply to

FabulousTexan: 

I'm not posting this as a bad beat but as the answer to the frustrated posts from the low limit player who's getting killed by opponents sucking out and making horrible plays.

The post usually goes something like this... Hand history where the hero bets 3-5x with preflop with a good hand. Some donkey either calls or even pushes over the top with a mediocre pair, weak ace, or any 2 suited. Hero bets to deny the draw, villain chases. Villain hits a miralce river and busts the hero.

Hero is amazed how such bad play is rewarded.

Hero posts here wondering if he should move up in limits because people, the logic goes, better players won't make dumb calls preflop and won't chase draws to the river regardless of pot odds.

I understand the frustration because I started playing the $5 SnGs and worked my way up. I remember becoming enraged a few occassions when some donkey made a mind numbingly horrid play and was rewarded. And, yeah, sometimes they come in series.

You're looking for answers and the rationalization is playing "players that know how to play right" won't make stupid plays and suckout.

PokerStars Game #19486021738: Tournament #101111438, $50+$5 Hold'em No Limit - Level I (10/20) - 2008/08/09 - 14:46:00 (ET)
Table '101111438 1' 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: ChampsPoker (880 in chips)
Seat 2: bluebuilder (2300 in chips)
Seat 3: npfd14 (1420 in chips)
Seat 4: roeydo (1500 in chips)
Seat 5: al monaco (1480 in chips)
Seat 6: elwayrulz (1420 in chips)
Seat 7: dj26xxx (1500 in chips)
Seat 8: johneecanuck (1500 in chips)
Seat 9: TexnNOcala (1500 in chips)
npfd14: posts small blind 10
roeydo: posts big blind 20
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to TexnNOcala [Ah Kd]
al monaco: folds
elwayrulz: calls 20
dj26xxx: folds
johneecanuck: folds
TexnNOcala: raises 80 to 100
ChampsPoker: folds
bluebuilder: calls 100
npfd14: folds
roeydo: folds
elwayrulz: calls 80
*** FLOP *** [Kh 8h Ac]
elwayrulz: checks
TexnNOcala: bets 185
bluebuilder: calls 185
elwayrulz: folds
*** TURN *** [Kh 8h Ac] [2c]
TexnNOcala: bets 425
bluebuilder: calls 425
*** RIVER *** [Kh 8h Ac 2c] [2h]
TexnNOcala: checks
bluebuilder: bets 740
TexnNOcala: raises 50 to 790 and is all-in
bluebuilder: calls 50
*** SHOW DOWN ***
TexnNOcala: shows [Ah Kd] (two pair, Aces and Kings)
bluebuilder: shows [Jh 4h] (a flush, King high)
TexnNOcala said, "DEAR GOID"
bluebuilder collected 3130 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 3130 | Rake 0
Board [Kh 8h Ac 2c 2h]
Seat 1: ChampsPoker folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: bluebuilder (button) showed [Jh 4h] and won (3130) with a flush, King high
Seat 3: npfd14 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: roeydo (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: al monaco folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 6: elwayrulz folded on the Flop
Seat 7: dj26xxx folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 8: johneecanuck folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: TexnNOcala showed [Ah Kd] and lost with two pair, Aces and Kings

The point here isn't to whine about a bad beat but just point out that there is horrible play at levels higher than $5 and $10.

As frustrating as it is at the moment, long term you should understand that guys making horrible plays will pay you.

If you keep playing good poker you will build your bankroll and your skill will improve to where you move up because you've got the bankroll and the game to compete with better players.

Moving up because you want to avoid bad players? Not the answer.



Your using a $50 buy for an example of higher quality players....LMAO

Randinho (Australia) 1,864 Posts. Joined 07-02-2006.
08-09-2008 2:39 PM - In reply to

330 in pot on flop and you bet 185 giving him a little under 3:1 which is sufficient odds to chase a flush on the flop. 700 on turn and you bet 425 again giving him a little under 3:1. Now his call is not proper but not horrible either. Bet more on the flop or turn at least to get him off his probable draw. If he chases down pot-sized bets then you have something to bitch about.


acecatcher26 (United States) 4,192 Posts. Joined 01-16-2006.
08-09-2008 2:46 PM - In reply to

I must say that reading the poker discussion forum anymore, is almost untolerable to me.


FabulousTexan (United States) 312 Posts. Joined 04-12-2006.
08-09-2008 2:47 PM - In reply to

Randinho: 

330 in pot on flop and you bet 185 giving him a little under 3:1 which is sufficient odds to chase a flush on the flop. 700 on turn and you bet 425 again giving him a little under 3:1. Now his call is not proper but not horrible either. Bet more on the flop or turn at least to get him off his probable draw. If he chases down pot-sized bets then you have something to bitch about.



But I'm not bitching. I'm not posting in the bad beats.

I was happy for the action.. it just didn't work out for me.

Like you said... he had UNDER 3:1... I wanted him to chase a flush draw or play AQ/AJ etc. I didn't want to completely shut him down. I want bad players to make bad chases. Sometimes it doesn't work and it's frustrating. But long-term... you get paid off.

The point of the was pointing out that the plays you see at $5 and $10 tables are the same ones you see at higher stakes.

 


RichardHurtz (Russian Federation) 2,196 Posts. Joined 05-05-2007.
08-09-2008 2:51 PM - In reply to

FabulousTexan: 

The point of the was pointing out that the plays you see at $5 and $10 tables are the same ones you see at higher stakes.

 



A $50 buy in is not high stakes.

FabulousTexan (United States) 312 Posts. Joined 04-12-2006.
08-09-2008 2:57 PM - In reply to

RichardHurtz: 

FabulousTexan: 

The point of the was pointing out that the plays you see at $5 and $10 tables are the same ones you see at higher stakes.

 



A $50 buy in is not high stakes.



Where did I claim it was high stakes? Seriously?!?!?!?

I said it was higher stakes than the $5 and $10 tourneys poster bring up when asking they should move up to avoid wreckless gamblers getting rewarded.

We're actually agreeing here.

kevin070 (United States) 1,255 Posts. Joined 08-19-2005.
08-09-2008 3:03 PM - In reply to

Texan doesn't claim it is high stakes anywhere in her post. It is higher than the players who come on here bitchin about a bad beat in a $5/10 sng or mtt who thinks they need to move up limits to avoid bad suckouts. It is a good example for those players. She doesn't need a $100 or $150 mtt for the example.


Randinho (Australia) 1,864 Posts. Joined 07-02-2006.
08-09-2008 3:06 PM - In reply to

FabulousTexan: 
Randinho: 

330 in pot on flop and you bet 185 giving him a little under 3:1 which is sufficient odds to chase a flush on the flop. 700 on turn and you bet 425 again giving him a little under 3:1. Now his call is not proper but not horrible either. Bet more on the flop or turn at least to get him off his probable draw. If he chases down pot-sized bets then you have something to bitch about.



But I'm not bitching. I'm not posting in the bad beats.

I was happy for the action.. it just didn't work out for me.

Like you said... he had UNDER 3:1... I wanted him to chase a flush draw or play AQ/AJ etc. I didn't want to completely shut him down. I want bad players to make bad chases. Sometimes it doesn't work and it's frustrating. But long-term... you get paid off.

The point of the was pointing out that the plays you see at $5 and $10 tables are the same ones you see at higher stakes.

 



He's getting exact proper odds to call the flop bet unless you have two pair or better (which in this case you did but you can't automatically put your opp. on two pair there). Obviously he isn't on the turn but is probably justifying it with implied odds now that half your stack is in. I'm not defending the play as great play, it's marginal, I just think you could've used a better example of people playing poorly. This is far from horrible. I do agree with you though, people still play bad at higher stakes, just not as many.

XCappucinoX1 (United States) 228 Posts. Joined 11-25-2007.
08-09-2008 7:37 PM - In reply to

 why are you checking and raising all in on river? you should either shove or check fold....i cant seem to find a logical reason why you would check call or raise the river.


FabulousTexan (United States) 312 Posts. Joined 04-12-2006.
08-09-2008 10:47 PM - In reply to

I'm not claiming I played it great. Yeah, I kinda got caught in no-man's land on the river and didn't know where I was.

My point was that people still call big raises preflop with J6s and chase flushes $5 or $50 tourney.


Jennifear (United States) 9,638 Posts. Joined 11-01-2005.
08-09-2008 11:37 PM - In reply to

I hear this a lot as it relates to SNGs

In a $500 SNG, when you are in 4th place on the bubble, you'll have to fight like hell for a spot, because the others aren't making loose calls.  In a $5 SNG, you often back in because 3rd place called the chipleader's frequent shoves with K9 s0000000ted.

In a $500 SNG, when you are in 3rd place on the bubble, your hands are tied as blind after blind is stolen.  In a $5 SNG, often the chipleader is bad enough to give you a walk or let you see a free flop!

In a $500 SNG, early on when you get it allin preflop with KK, you are against QQ+ most of the time, and often not QQ.  In a $5 SNG, you are up against AJ+ or 88+, and often worse.

Which opponents would you rather play? lol


AFink93 (United States) 12,913 Posts. Joined 03-31-2006.
08-09-2008 11:41 PM - In reply to

There are good players and bad players at all levels from 1 cent NL to 200/400NL.. If you cant beat the good players and the bad players at the microlevels then your not going to be able to beat them at the higher buy-ins either. Stop caring about how other people play. Play your game.. Let them play anyway they want.. You play good you will beat em.  

 
Return to Top
Page 1 of 1 (14 items)


P5's Member Blogs
The Glory Days
By dtools22 - added Mar 11 2010, 10:03 AM
Heater approaching
By Goldenad - added Mar 12 2010, 02:27 PM
Bankroll Blueprint: ABC R...
By dgillis - added Mar 10 2010, 10:39 AM
 
Jason 'treysfull21' Mercier joins the PocketFives Podcast to talk about his live poker success.

P5s Podcast, March 11, 2010
Thur, 11 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST
Tenth ranked online tournament pro Taylor Paur is this week's featured podcast guest.

P5s Podcast, March 4, 2010
Thur, 4 Mar 2010 12:00:00 EST
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. gboro780 1 1
2. Doc Sands 3 4
3. djk123 6 3
4. kleath 4 5
5. moorman1 12 2
6. bigdogpckt5s 2 12
7. 1SickDisease 5 8
8. taypaur 7 15
9. dipthrong 14 10
10. govshark2 18 7
Sortable Rankings
Rank PLB
 1. gboro780 8186.56
 2. 1SickDisease 8175.86
 3. kleath 7993.04
 4. taypaur 7783.18
 5. djk123 7719.86
 6. evechad 7454.52
 7. theczar19 7279.67
 8. daisyxoxo 7138.35
 9. dipthrong 7092.00
 10. govshark2 6928.23
Go


 
Daniel Alaei Wins!
2009-12-20 03:56:56
Faraz Jaka 3rd ($571,374)
2009-12-20 02:57:50