Poker Discussion Post

 
Sign in | Join
in
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Poker Discussion


Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site!
CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog

   

POTRIPPER PXF HH
sheets (United States) 2,216 Posts. Joined 01-29-2005.
10-15-2007 10:58 AM

Ok mindwise tells me its very buggy and it stops after hand 94 but it is still funny as hell to watch

http://www.pokerxfactor.com/HA90370/2_20071014_190711/2


sheets
 
 
 

TheWacoKidd (United States) 25,187 Posts. Joined 10-05-2005.
10-14-2007 8:19 PM - In reply to

Sassy, if he was being relayed the hands by a super account it would take a few seconds to get all the info together... with the 84 it looks like he limped in UTG before he had the info 

brsavage (United States) 2,871 Posts. Joined 01-25-2005.
10-14-2007 8:21 PM - In reply to

Sassy, seriously, you can't take ONE hand and try to quantify he's just a donkey theory when there are 1 zillion hands that support CLEARLY that this person had the unfair advantage of playing with the cards face up.

There is NO OTHER EXPLANATION, and I would bet everything I have that this person could see everyone else's holecards.

PERIOD. END OF DISCUSSION. THERE IS NO OTHER EXPLANATION.

Absolute has covered up a clear breach of security. There is no telling how much money was fleeced off the site, or even if the security hole has been fixed!

The hand history posted by Waco and Crazy Marco is irrefutable, and AP's prior statement that no one has access to holecard information goes right out the window when they emailed a player a hand history with EVERYONE'S holecards even without hands being shown down!

Compound that with the fact that the supporting hand history clearly shows the player with the river infinity aggression factor was 100% throughout the tournament winning even with inferior hands, knowing when opponents were weak, etc.,

AP has serious issues, has lied to it's players and the online poker community, and has a scandal on it's hands of monumental proportions. Lying and sticking it's head in the sand and acting like it is going to go away is just the worst thing in the world they can do...

You can't unexplode a bomb, they woud have been much better off disclosing the truth and doing what they could to restore confidence, instead they have eroded whatever faith we could have had in their word, which is now worthless.

Chris.

yooperusaf (United States) 987 Posts. Joined 08-20-2007.
10-14-2007 8:32 PM - In reply to

So where do i sign up?  I wouldn't mind making 20k-50k a day.  Sounds like a good time. hahaha.

STUEYUNGER (Canada) 128 Posts. Joined 07-13-2007.
10-14-2007 8:37 PM - In reply to

Jennifear much thanks for you help in this,i just hope all members do their part in alerting all players everywhere about this sick site.Also sassy plz dont smoke crack before you post.


TMLMS13 11,582 Posts. Joined 12-18-2005.
10-14-2007 9:01 PM - In reply to

Sassy, you are almost as annoying as that guy a few weeks ago who said it is impossible to win at online poker because of rake.

And with that 48 limp into KK, obv views an ace as an out as well, you can outplay ppl when u know what they have, even with if they have a big pair

DexterCain (United States) 13,347 Posts. Joined 08-24-2005.
10-14-2007 9:18 PM - In reply to

lololol

landman2069 (United States) 116 Posts. Joined 04-28-2006.
10-14-2007 9:34 PM - In reply to

Jennifear....please when you make a long hand history post like this in the future.  Make the first post a short note that says see post number two.  Then post the extended hand history in the 2nd post right below.  It takes FOREVER to load the entire history as the page goes to 2nd or 3rd pages.  If you just had the little message first it would be almost instant on the 2nd page!!!!

Now that is some 4th level thinking there!!!  git r done some say.

donkkkkk (Canada) 546 Posts. Joined 05-15-2007.
10-14-2007 9:45 PM - In reply to

Jennifear has wayy too much time on her hands.  Your opportunity cost must be really high for this.

I say you start charging people for your explanations.

Weeeeeeeee.

skeeze666 (United States) 4,639 Posts. Joined 11-16-2006.
10-14-2007 10:36 PM - In reply to

I just wanted to say thanks to Jennifear for attempting to show people who don't 'get it' why this is so blatant.

I only hope some of those people can actually read your analysis and understand what you are saying - if not, well, natural selection should help out eventually.

I haven't made a single post on this issue yet, but have done all the reading on all the sites.  I also didn't feel the need to post since it is so clearly 100% obvious what happened.

This is exactly the kind of thing that keeps me from making any kind of real attempt at online poker.  Every time I secure more than $1k online I cash most of it out and start again, because I simply don't always feel safe with my money on line, or playing against 'unknowns'...  I strongly hope that AP does something to clear this up.


SluggerWV (United States) 37,652 Posts. Joined 11-07-2005.
10-14-2007 10:44 PM - In reply to

waco makes a really good point that is more fully developed in his thread 


it seems that potripper was being relayed th einfo by an insider at ap so he didnt see the the cards face up on the screen but was being told the info  i would bet that he played pretty slowly for each decision compared to what online players usually do

threebanger (United States) 5,089 Posts. Joined 09-18-2007.
10-14-2007 10:58 PM - In reply to

Someone correct me if I am just sleepy and not quite getting this.

Isn't Absolute's emailing the hole cards of EVERY PLAYER in this tournament the freaking SMOKING GUN???

Besides that, forget the last hand. The QT hand where PotRaper goes over the top of a big bet and reraise on an 8-6-3 board is all the proof I need.


cigardad (United States) 232 Posts. Joined 01-17-2006.
10-14-2007 11:01 PM - In reply to

At least she takes the time to find a logical explaination rather than just agree because a well known player says it is or isn't.

peterpjames (United States) 1,044 Posts. Joined 05-19-2006.
10-14-2007 11:38 PM - In reply to

Also of note is as Nat posted on 2+2, Potripper folded rags the first two hands of the tourney before user 363 logged in, and once user 363 logged in he didn't fold again for 20 minutes preflop, until people had big pairs.

ranchgirl (United States) 1,032 Posts. Joined 03-02-2006.
10-15-2007 12:40 AM - In reply to

Covered up a breach in security?  Do you really think one clever hacker has taken advantage of an honest site or that the people behind the scenes at AP are the main cheats? 


kowboy8686 (United States) 4,507 Posts. Joined 08-12-2007.
10-15-2007 1:31 AM - In reply to

jenn....do you think pottripper needs a backer?
kowboy
 
Return to Top
Page 4 of 12 (179 items) « First ... < Previous 2 3 4 5 6 Next > ... Last »


P5's Member Blogs
Free Poker Coaching (I Ne...
By Cre8ive - added Nov 18 2009, 02:38 AM
Relationships and Poker
By dtools22 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:15 PM
A Victory and Playing wit...
By sgildea25 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:49 PM
 
Joe Cada is our guest this week!  The newest WSOP Main Event Champion answers questions from P5s viewers.

P5s Podcast, Nov 19, 2009
Thur, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
Jon 'apestyles' Van Fleet is back on the podcast this week to talk about the latest in his poker career.

P5s Podcast, Nov 12, 2009
Thur, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. gboro780 3 1
2. djk123 1 3
3. Jovial Gent 2 4
4. moorman1 8 2
5. Doc Sands 5 6
6. rock3656 6 8
7. govshark2 7 7
8. ImaLuckSac 11 9
9. badpab2 4 19
10. brainwash 10 16
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
Rank PLB
 1. djk123 9022.06
 2. Jovial Gent 8103.48
 3. gboro780 8046.07
 4. rock3656 7746.87
 5. govshark2 7645.73
 6. brainwash 7528.39
 7. 1SickDisease 7466.88
 8. ImaLuckSac 7369.79
 9. hoodini10 7327.57
 10. HITTHEPANDA 7271.41
Go