Poker Discussion Post

 
Sign in | Join
in
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Poker Discussion


Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site!
CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog

   

Tiffany Michelle's official statement
squid300 (United States) 251 Posts. Joined 06-29-2007.
07-17-2008 9:51 PM

 

Tiffany Michelle Official Statement
Thursday, July 17, 2008

It is with great sadness that I’ve had to see my accomplishment of finishing 17th in the WSOP Main Event clouded by slanderous accusations and inaccurate information. I have been humbled by the overwhelming support from friends, fans and the media and for their sake as well as mine I feel as if I must respond and bring clarity to the situation.



There is no denying the positive press and exposure I brought Pokernews by wearing their logo and being their representative during the 2008 World Series of Poker main event. After such a successful series, I am greatly dismayed by Pokernews' subsequent actions. No one has ever questioned my integrity before this and I am so distressed that Pokernews is using their powerful public forum to spin such a negative recounting of the facts of what occurred during the final two days of the main event.



As we all know, it is standard practice for players to wear multiple logos during the main event. Pokernews was aware of this, having placed their logos on a number of players with sponsorship deals with other companies. Throughout the World Series I saw several players wear the Pokernews logo alongside the logos of online card rooms such as Pokerstars and T6. This makes it very clear that Pokernews supported this practice as a rule and were not against players wearing their logo in conjunction with the logo of an online card room. Like many other people, I wore multiple logos but in no way diminished the presence of Pokernews in doing so.



Unfortunately in this instance, Pokernews suddenly felt that I was in violation of my backing deal by wearing another logo. I have a written contract that has been reviewed by legal counsel – and it is very clearly a non-exclusive contract meaning that while I was expected to wear the Pokernews logo – I was in no way prevented from wearing any other logo. Furthermore Pokernews did not possess any power to make, advise or negotiate any kind of logo or sponsorship deal that came about via my playing the main event. In light of recent allegations by Pokernews, I have had this contract reviewed again by legal counsel to reconfirm my stance – that I in no way was in violation. It was never even said to me verbally until after the fact that there was an expectation of exclusivity. Even in my previous dealings with Pokernews, as their On-Camera Host I have made a point to never agree to any kind of exclusivity with their company as advised by my talent manager. The first I heard of Pokernews’ disapproval to me wearing the UB logo was after I already had it on and was playing on the featured table.



It was unfortunate that while I was working hard to try to win the main event (and in so doing help to further promote Pokernews) I was chastised by Pokernews representatives at all hours of the day and night for wearing a second logo. Despite my repeated requests that they go through my manager and let me just concentrate on playing, they insisted on contacting me directly, greatly upsetting me during the most important weekend of my life. These representatives of Pokernews kept repeatedly telling me they had nothing but ‘my best interests at heart’ yet I felt bombarded by several parties trying to control my decisions and pressure my actions.



A fact that is known to Pokernews is that I was approached by many online poker sites wanting me to represent them during the last few days of the event; however I chose to work with UltimateBet. Tony G even quotes in his BLOG “I had been working on putting a deal together for Tiff with PokerStars and they had just emailed me. I knew Tiff could become a huge star and I was going to allow her to do a deal that would protect Pokernews also for the main event”. The fact that Pokernews was willing to work with PokerStars on a joint deal says it all – the contract was NONEXCLUSIVE.



I am a grown woman and I can decide for myself who I choose to associate myself with. That should not be Tony G’s decision. Just because Tony G. backed me in the event (and profited quite nicely by doing so) does not mean that he should be able to control or profit from any logo or sponsorship deal I might make or have any say in how I handle my career. I have been around poker a long time and it’s widely known that a backer has no say or cut of a player’s sponsorship or logo deal. Again, I had seen several Pokernews sponsored players wearing online card room logos already so clearly the backing deal and the logo deals were separate for every other player wearing Pokernews.

Why would it be different just for me?

In the end, I completely stand by my decision and I feel that UltimateBet was the one site that treated me with the respect and dignity deserving of someone in my stressful situation. Throughout the whole event they were insistent on wanting me to just concentrate on my play and were clear that the decision in the end was mine and I should do what I felt was best for me.



It is unfortunate that Pokernews has taken the step of publicly accusing me of breaching their contract when I have been scrupulous in fulfilling my obligations. I have always felt that disputes like this should be handled privately and in this case using such a broad reaching platform to air such a dispute seems really inappropriate to me. Still, I want to say how much I appreciate the opportunities that Pokernews has given me. I am deeply grateful to Jeff Lisandro and Tony G for backing me in the event and giving me this opportunity to play in the most exciting event of my life.

 
 
 

BraveJayhawk (United States) 335 Posts. Joined 09-07-2005.
07-18-2008 1:37 AM - In reply to

number1pen: 
tcstunna: 

there is no way she didnt know about ub's scandals/problems



If shes like most live amateurs, she probably doesnt


This is why she has an agent.  If the agent wasn't aware of the situation, she should fire her agent.  She must have heard something about the UB scandal.  Even if she didn't know the depth of the situation, she certainly heard of something that should have lead her to look into the situation and seek counsel.

Instead, she took the first bit of money that was thrown her way.  She really hurt herself in the long run even if Poker News hadn't made an issue of it.  If she was offered X by UB, she could have used that when approached by other sites to negotiate a better deal for herself.  She makes a good point that other players had Poker News logo and site, but I think she should have realized it'd be better to ask her employer before plastering UBs logo all over herself especially considering the scope of the UB situation.


ficha19 (Panama) 457 Posts. Joined 02-03-2007.
07-18-2008 3:02 AM - In reply to

she is hot. i support her

 =)

kcd0g (United States) 248 Posts. Joined 10-26-2007.
07-18-2008 6:18 AM - In reply to

talismon: 


She made a deal during an open window opportunity to secure her financial future, anyone would have done the same. 



She made enough dough agreeing to wear UB gear for a couple of days to secure her financial future?

gguk2008 (United Kingdom) 1,021 Posts. Joined 05-24-2008.
07-18-2008 6:38 AM - In reply to

It looks as though nobody has covered themselves in glory in this entire episode. The whole thing has confused me though, to be honest, so I'm going to reserve judgement. There are enough judges, juries and executioners (a lot of them laymen, though they'll never agree) in here to blow this out of all proportion so I'll leave it be.

I agree with the guy who said it's hardly newsworthy.


wtf (United States) 1,630 Posts. Joined 06-04-2007.
07-18-2008 6:49 AM - In reply to

I think Tony G should superman this hoe


TaKeN_pOiNtS (United States) 580 Posts. Joined 10-28-2006.
07-18-2008 6:53 AM - In reply to

i cant believe people actually give a fuck about this???  WHO FUCKING CARES?!?!?!?


Bob Futon (Libyan Arab Jamahiriya) 7,619 Posts. Joined 10-19-2007.
07-18-2008 6:54 AM - In reply to

After the last month UB has had, isn't signing with UB now like joining the Nazi's in 1946?


darkknyt (United States) 952 Posts. Joined 09-05-2006.
07-18-2008 7:31 AM - In reply to

MUPP, that's just because you're at a much higher level of intelligence than the rest of us. 


P0KERPR033 (United States) 840 Posts. Joined 08-04-2005.
07-18-2008 7:47 AM - In reply to
19

Since when does someone backing you give them rights to your endorsement deals?  I had a couple horses at the WSOP and I never once thought that if one my horses got a deal by making a final table or making a deep run that I would have any piece of that.  One of them made it to day 5 of the Main Event and may get some money for a tv apperance.


squid300 (United States) 251 Posts. Joined 06-29-2007.
07-18-2008 8:34 AM - In reply to

TaKeN_pOiNtS: 

i cant believe people actually give a fuck about this???  WHO FUCKING CARES?!?!?!?



Not that i "FUCKING CARE"  but it has been well documented on p5s and other sites about every side of the story but hers.

ficha19 (Panama) 457 Posts. Joined 02-03-2007.
07-18-2008 8:46 AM - In reply to

squid300: 
TaKeN_pOiNtS: 

i cant believe people actually give a fuck about this???  WHO FUCKING CARES?!?!?!?



Not that i "FUCKING CARE"  but it has been well documented on p5s and other sites about every side of the story but hers.


this is p5s after all, celebrity poker magazine

ficha19 (Panama) 457 Posts. Joined 02-03-2007.
07-18-2008 8:50 AM - In reply to

P0KERPR033: 

Since when does someone backing you give them rights to your endorsement deals?  I had a couple horses at the WSOP and I never once thought that if one my horses got a deal by making a final table or making a deep run that I would have any piece of that.  One of them made it to day 5 of the Main Event and may get some money for a tv apperance.



I guess backing someone does not give you the rights to the endorsement deals. However, maybe Tony G is pissed because, according to him, they did discussed who would own the rights of endorsement before they gave her the money to play the ME. She agreed to being staked under certain terms that are not typical such as giving up the endorsement rights. I dont know if this is accurate but that is what i think Tony G said or implied in his blog.

-Tuco

brsavage (United States) 2,871 Posts. Joined 01-25-2005.
07-18-2008 9:39 AM - In reply to

ficha19: 
P0KERPR033: 

Since when does someone backing you give them rights to your endorsement deals?  I had a couple horses at the WSOP and I never once thought that if one my horses got a deal by making a final table or making a deep run that I would have any piece of that.  One of them made it to day 5 of the Main Event and may get some money for a tv apperance.



I guess backing someone does not give you the rights to the endorsement deals. However, maybe Tony G is pissed because, according to him, they did discussed who would own the rights of endorsement before they gave her the money to play the ME. She agreed to being staked under certain terms that are not typical such as giving up the endorsement rights. I dont know if this is accurate but that is what i think Tony G said or implied in his blog.

-Tuco


What's more likely, that a couple of guys that had some blood leave their brain and go to their nether regions decided to put her in the WSOP main event on a backing deal and didn't cover anything to do with endorsements until lightbulbs went off in their brain that they could try and take advantage of her....

or


These well meant, highly intelligent, super fair poker professionals clearly were staking her because of her endorsement value, even though they happened to forget to mention anything about endorsements in the contract.

Newsflash... If they had staked Court, or any other poker news employee this would have been a non-issue, however, since it was a chick, they thought they could take advantage of her and intimidate her into thinking she was obligated to give them part of the endorsement money.

I agree she should have left her PN logos in the same manner in which she had been wearing it, but the reality is PN got an extreme amount of exposure, and the ONLY reason TG and company are pissed has nothing to do with PN not being represented, it has to do with their unbridled greed and they are miffed that the dumb chick wasn't so stupid after all.


jimmyk01 154 Posts. Joined 06-26-2006.
07-18-2008 9:45 AM - In reply to

Tiff's a loser, karma will come back and bite her in the ass and it will be sweet.  She's a one time top 20 finisher and I predict we really won't hear from her again on the felt.  And, can she please write her own damn press releases?  If your such a grown woman Tiffy learn to write your own material and don't depend on a publicist or manager to do so, she is probably unethical and unable to write words bigger than two syllables.  I also find it funny how she in a roundabout way blames pokernews for busting out 18th due to the pressure they were putting her under, f'ing joke.


Blackout4 (United States) 5,808 Posts. Joined 12-09-2006.
07-18-2008 9:51 AM - In reply to

I'd be shocked if I found out more than 10 words in this reponse were actually written by Tiffany

 
Return to Top
Page 3 of 5 (65 items) < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next >


P5's Member Blogs
Relationships and Poker
By dtools22 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:15 PM
Free Poker Coaching (I Ne...
By Cre8ive - added Nov 18 2009, 02:38 AM
A Victory and Playing wit...
By sgildea25 - added Nov 16 2009, 12:49 PM
 
Joe Cada is our guest this week!  The newest WSOP Main Event Champion answers questions from P5s viewers.

P5s Podcast, Nov 19, 2009
Thur, 19 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
Jon 'apestyles' Van Fleet is back on the podcast this week to talk about the latest in his poker career.

P5s Podcast, Nov 12, 2009
Thur, 12 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. gboro780 3 1
2. djk123 1 3
3. Jovial Gent 2 4
4. moorman1 8 2
5. Doc Sands 5 6
6. rock3656 6 8
7. govshark2 7 7
8. ImaLuckSac 11 9
9. badpab2 4 19
10. brainwash 10 16
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
Rank PLB
 1. djk123 9022.06
 2. Jovial Gent 8103.48
 3. gboro780 8046.07
 4. rock3656 7746.87
 5. govshark2 7645.73
 6. brainwash 7528.39
 7. 1SickDisease 7466.88
 8. ImaLuckSac 7369.79
 9. hoodini10 7327.57
 10. HITTHEPANDA 7271.41
Go