Poker Legislation
|

|
Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site! CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog
|
24,000 Online Poker Players Affected by Federal Funds Seizure
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/APNewsBreak-Group-says-poker-apf-15481559.html?sec=topStories&pos=4&asset=&ccode=
APNewsBreak: Group says poker winnings are frozen
APNewsBreak: Group says government has frozen online poker players' winnings
WASHINGTON (AP) -- An advocacy group for online poker says the federal government has frozen the accounts of payment processors that handle the winnings of thousands of online poker players.
The Poker Players Alliance says those winnings are worth upward of $30 million.
The alliance tells The Associated Press that the U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York told three banks to freeze the accounts.
A document obtained by the AP shows that a judge in the district issued a seizure warrant last week for an account at a Wells Fargo bank in San Francisco.
The Justice Department has long maintained that Internet gambling is illegal, a view that the poker group challenges.
|
|
|
|
|
solid, we have a strong team upfront fighting this battle for us and i'm happy to see this. keep the vids coming
|
|
|
|
One more thing.... Bill to study compulsive gaming introduced
We need to watch this one closely, as the recommendations could end
up motivated not on how best to help those who develop excessive gaming
habits, but by the politics of those who'd ban gaming for all adults.
-----------------------------------
Rep. Terry Leads Fight To Fund Gambling Addiction Researchhttp://it.quote.com/news/story.action?id=RTT906171108001129
(RTTNews) - Three congressmen - one Democrat and two Republicans - put forward a new bill this week
aimed at fighting gambling addiction. Representatives Lee Terry (R-NE), Jim Moran (D-VA) and Frank Wolf (R-VA) introduced the "Comprehensive
Problem Gambling Act," which would use funds from he federal government for the research and treatment
of gambling addiction. "Gambling addiction can destroy families and communities," said Terry, who represents Nebraska's
2nd District, centered around Omaha. He added, "Bankruptcy, divorce and crime are all devastating results of gambling addiction. For
the first time ever this legislation would commit federal dollars to the research and treatment of gambling
dependence.".......
|
|
|
|
tcb21
(United States)
291
Posts.
Joined
07-07-2007.
06-18-2009 9:04 AM
-
In reply to
|
|
|
|
After watching Mr Pappas' interview and comparing it to Mr. Kathlein's (online poker players=alcoholics and child beaters) interview, it appears the the online poker community is in pretty good hands.
|
|
|
|
Congressman Erik Paulsen to me show details Jun 16 (2 days ago) Reply
This is the letter I got back from my letter
Thank you for contacting my office to share your views and concerns. It is an honor and a privilege to represent the people of Minnesota, and I want to be responsive to your needs and concerns.
Using the online form helps my office organize your communications to ensure that I am able to respond to your request in the most efficient and thorough manner possible. Please consider this e-mail an acknowledgement that I have received your comments.
Sincerely,
Congressman Erik Paulsen United States Congressman, Minnesota 3rd district
Please visit http://paulsen.congressnewsletter.net/mail/util.cfm?mailaction=profile to sign up for Email Updates:
Reply Forward
|
|
|
tcb21: |   |
After watching Mr Pappas' interview and comparing it to Mr. Kathlein's (online poker players=alcoholics and child beaters) interview, it appears the the online poker community is in pretty good hands.
exactly. at least we have people fighting for us rather than just the forums.
i got a 4k wire today in pending transactions for my bank. clear 1 time!!!
|
|
|
D41M41B: |   |
K1d_Gr1nD: |   |
RollTideRoll: |   |
I am looking to do a bank wire on my next cashout.
Can anyone can tell me what is a Bank Swift - BIC? Its on the bank wire application on PS.
Thx in advance. RTR
guys DO NOT post specific info about what the are doing to combat this shit!!!!!...dont make it any easier for teh feds...your are kidding yourself if you dont think they are reading these posts... MODS, DELETE ALL SPECIFIC INFO THAT THE FEDS COULD USE...IMMED!!!!
lol you are an idiot trying to be superman. nothing in that post at ALL is anything the feds do not know or can't find out by looking at the cashout options on pokerstars website. its basic knowledge any international bank transfer requres a swift code.. so thanks, but no thanks.
no need in calling names...your a kid who obv doesnt fully understand everything...wow....just wow
|
|
|
|
lolol. calling me a kid when his name specifically has KID in it. all im saying it stop overreacting as his post had nothing harmful at all in it. so again, thanks. but no thanks.
|
|
|
lance0623: |   |
My credit union (Navy Federal) doesn't have a SWIFT code - is it needed for them to do a wire transfer to me?
YES! I had to put my credit union on the bench in favor of US Bank.
|
|
|
|
Patrick "Skallagrim" Fleming, PPA's Litigation Support Director, has
kindly taken the time to put together some information for us regarding
various federal legal issues. Please check it out:
Click here to Twitter Skallagrim: |   |
Hello fellow poker players. This is the
PPA's Litigation Support Director "Skallagrim" and I am posting this at
the request of TheEngineer.
The recent seizure of funds by the
US government and the resulting disruption in echecks and paper checks
has a lot of poker players rightly concerned; they want to know: is it
a violation of Federal Law for me to play online poker, to cash out,
and/or to deposit?
I will try and make sense of these question
in this post. Unfortunately, virtually all of the law in this area is
open to debate. So until the courts make actual decisions on these
issues, nothing is completely for certain.
Lets start with the big question: Is playing online poker illegal under Federal law?
The
answer to that question is the only one that is pretty straight
forward: there is a general legal consensus that even the DOJ agrees
with that merely participating in a poker game online does not subject
a US resident to a federal prosecution, In other words, THERE IS NO
FEDERAL LAW MAKING PLAYING ONLINE POKER A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
- Please note, State laws are an entirely different matter and will be the subject of a later post -
The
reason I can say the above with some certainty is that there are only 4
Federal laws that affect "gambling" and thus arguably poker. They are
the recently passed Unlawful Internet Gaming Enforcement Act (UIGEA),
and the older Wire Act (WA), the Illegal Gambling Business Act (IGBA),
and the Travel Act (TA). ALL OF THESE FEDERAL LAWS TARGET THE BUSINESS
PROVIDING THE GAMBLING, NOT THE PLAYERS PARTICIPATING IN THE GAME.
I
must note that is is also arguable that none of these four acts apply
to online poker at all, for either the player or the site (that again
is for another post), but I want to concentrate this post on player's money, not on money held by the sites.
The
UIGEA is, of course, the act most people have heard of. It was passed
in Oct. 2006 and shortly thereafter a number of large online poker
sites left the US market. THE UIGEA, HOWEVER, DID NOT MAKE ONLINE
POKER ILLEGAL. The UIGEA expressly states in the law that it was not
making any game illegal that wasn't already illegal, nor was it making
any illegal game legal. So despite those sites that left the US, either
they had already broken US law by running a poker site before the UIGEA
passed, or they were not breaking the law and the UIGEA does not apply
to them. As you well know, some sites believed they were not breaking
the law and continued to offer poker to US residents.
The evil
of the UIGEA, as it affects your money, is found in the provisions that
relate to banks. These provisions also do not "make" poker transactions
illegal; they either already were or they already were not. But the
provisions encourage the banks to block any transaction that might be
related to "illegal online gambling." If they block a transaction that
has anything to do with any game on the internet (including as was
recently publicized, credit card purchases of State Lottery tickets!)
they cannot get in trouble. If they knowingly allow a gambling
transaction, however, they get in big trouble. Obviously if you run a
bank its far easier to just not handle any transaction that's related
to gambling than to try and figure out which ones are legal ones and
which ones are illegal ones. But at least when a bank declines your
transaction, they don't take your money. At worst they will hold it for
a time while investigating, then return it to you and maybe close your account.
And one last point, the UIGEA, if it applies to poker at all, only applies to deposits to
sites, it says nothing about player withdrawals from sites. It even
says this in the regulations. But you try telling that to your bank's
manager.
Taking your money for keeps can only be done by the
government. They can seize money while investigating if they have
"probable cause" to believe its "illegal proceeds." That's what they
have done so far in the recent case. But they can only make it theirs
for good by starting a legal Forfeiture action and proving in court by
"a preponderance of the evidence" that the money is "illegal proceeds."
This has not happened ... yet.
"Illegal proceeds" thus becomes
the key. But generally speaking, illegal proceeds in the gambling
context must be proceeds of the gambling business, not winnings or other money returned to the players.
Of
course, its hard to prove whose money it is when its solely in the
hands of the gambling business. So, for example, if you bet $50 with an
online sports book on the Giants to win, and the Feds bust that book
before the game and seize that money - the Feds are not going to give
it back to you if the bet money is actually in the hands of the bookie.
But
that's not the same as when that same sports book sends you back $75
because the game happened and in fact the Giants did win. At some point
that becomes your money. And under Federal law your money (so
long as you are not a "gambling business" like being another bookie) is
not "proceeds." Again ignoring state law issues, and using sports
betting as an example because it is clearly illegal under federal law,
even your illegal gambling winnings are NOT illegal gambling business proceeds, and so not subject to Federal Forfeiture.
And
that's the irony of what is currently going on. It is painfully obvious
reading all the posts about the players who have had checks bounce and
incurred overdraft fees or couldn't pay other bills, that the recent
action by the Federal Government directly affected you players! It cost
you your money! It was certainly not site proceeds.
And
while the sites have for the most part taken it upon themselves to
restore lost funds in players' accounts, that was probably not
something they were legally required to do. For example, when you get a
paycheck and someone steals it from you and cashes it before you can
stop payment on it, you don't get a new paycheck (unless you have a
very generous employer). Usually you are the one out the money. What
the government did to poker players isn't exactly the same, of course,
but the general principle still applies IMHO.
And that's why
this action by our government has to be the last such action; we must
stop this if we can, one way or another. This case will really set the
standard for the future. If the Government can get away with this one, your poker money is not safe. If poker money isn't safe, who will play?
So,
I say it is time to FIGHT. For us lawyers, we are preparing to go to
court. For the rest of you, DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN! Join the PPA, write
letters, call your congressperson, and let your friends know so they
can join the fight too.
As for specific help fighting for your
rights to your money, for that information I will turn things over to
my friend and fellow PPA member, TheEngineer. Thanks for your time reading this, Skallagrim
|
|
|
|
G911 has an interesting update on the SDNY DOJ seizure. http://www.gambling911.com/gambling-news/team-full-tilt-worries-over-poker-echeck-seizures-070109.html Of course, anything in the G911 must be taken with a grain of salt. Still, it appears that the DOJ is not backing down since it has not unsealed the court documents behind this seizure. So I have a question for Skall and TE. Has the PPA planned for potential DOJ action (subpoena to testify before a grand jury or, much less likely, filing of criminal information or indictment) against poker pros who represent FTP or PS or against principles of FTP or its software provider?
|
|
|
JPFisher55: |   |
G911 has an interesting update on the SDNY DOJ seizure. http://www.gambling911.com/gambling-news/team-full-tilt-worries-over-poker-echeck-seizures-070109.html Of course, anything in the G911 must be taken with a grain of salt. Still, it appears that the DOJ is not backing down since it has not unsealed the court documents behind this seizure. So I have a question for Skall and TE. Has the PPA planned for potential DOJ action (subpoena to testify before a grand jury or, much less likely, filing of criminal information or indictment) against poker pros who represent FTP or PS or against principles of FTP or its software provider?
This article, IMHO, like so much of what g911 writes, needs to be taken with much more than a grain of salt. A truckload would seem about right.
I do think that if the DOJ were planning on arresting any person they would do that first and seize the money second - thats how they usually do it anyway. Its much easier for the person to get away after the money is seized than it is for the person to hide the money after they have been arrested.
As for the FTP pros, they don't need the PPA's lawyers; they already have some of the best lawyers in the country in their corner.
Skallagrim
|
|
|
Skallagrim: |   |
JPFisher55: |   |
G911 has an interesting update on the SDNY DOJ seizure. http://www.gambling911.com/gambling-news/team-full-tilt-worries-over-poker-echeck-seizures-070109.html Of course, anything in the G911 must be taken with a grain of salt. Still, it appears that the DOJ is not backing down since it has not unsealed the court documents behind this seizure. So I have a question for Skall and TE. Has the PPA planned for potential DOJ action (subpoena to testify before a grand jury or, much less likely, filing of criminal information or indictment) against poker pros who represent FTP or PS or against principles of FTP or its software provider?
This article, IMHO, like so much of what g911 writes, needs to be taken with much more than a grain of salt. A truckload would seem about right. I do think that if the DOJ were planning on arresting any person they would do that first and seize the money second - thats how they usually do it anyway. Its much easier for the person to get away after the money is seized than it is for the person to hide the money after they have been arrested. As for the FTP pros, they don't need the PPA's lawyers; they already have some of the best lawyers in the country in their corner. Skallagrim
Agree 100%
|
|
|
|
|
PocketFives.com Rankings
|
|
|
|
|
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|