Poker Legislation Post

 
Sign in | Join
in
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Poker Legislation


Please help support pocketfives by using our links when choosing to download a new site!
CarbonPoker · Full Tilt · Cake Poker · PokerStars · Ultimate Bet · Players Only · Bodog

   

New legislation to stop implementation of UIGEA
TheEngineer (United States) 2,064 Posts. Joined 11-23-2007.
04-11-2008 5:22 PM

Great news!

Frank, Paul Introduce Legislation to Stop Implementation of Antigambling Regulations

Washington, DC—House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) and senior Financial Services Committee member Ron Paul (R-TX) have introduced legislation to prohibit the federal government from issuing regulations called for in the called for in the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006. The legislation, H.R. 5767, will forbid the Secretary of the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System from proposing, prescribing, or implementing any regulation that requires the financial services industry to identify and block internet gambling transactions.

“These regulations are impossible to implement without placing a significant burden on the payments system and financial institutions, and while I do disagree with the underlying objective of the Act, I believe that even those who agree with it ought to be concerned about the regulations’ impact,” said Rep. Frank.

“The ban on Internet gambling infringes upon two freedoms that are important to many Americans: the ability to do with their money as they see fit, and the freedom from government interference with the Internet. The regulations and underlying bill also force financial institutions to act as law enforcement officers. This is another pernicious trend that has accelerated in the aftermath of the Patriot Act, the deputization of private businesses to perform intrusive enforcement and surveillance functions that the federal government is unwilling to perform on its own,” said Rep. Paul.

Specifically, at issue is the fact that the regulations, like the underlying legislation, fail to define the term “unlawful internet gambling,” leaving it to each financial institution to reconcile conflicting state and federal laws, court decisions and inconsistent Department of Justice interpretation, when determining whether to process a transaction. Furthermore, some of the information needed to make this determination would likely be unavailable to banks, either because customers or financial institutions in foreign jurisdictions are unwilling or unable to provide it. At the hearing, the regulators themselves admitted that there are substantial problems in crafting regulations to implement the UIGEA that does not have a substantial adverse effect on the efficiency of the nation’s payment system.

Chairman Frank and Congressman Paul opposed the UIGEA, and the two have been working on legislation, H.R. 2046 that would license and regulate online gaming. However, it was clear at the hearing that the regulations are unworkable for the financial services industry, and this bill would, therefore prohibit their implementation.

On Wednesday, April 2, the DIMP Subcommittee held a hearing “Proposed UIGEA Regulations: Burden Without Benefit?” to examine the regulations issued last year by the Federal Reserve and Treasury on the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, which garnered more than 200 comment letters.

 
 
 

TheEngineer (United States) 2,064 Posts. Joined 11-23-2007.
04-11-2008 5:22 PM - In reply to

Frank Paul Bill text


Dan (United States) 2,216 Posts. Joined 05-01-2006.
04-11-2008 6:17 PM - In reply to

Thanks for posting this. It's huge news. Here's the P5s article about it as well:

http://www.pocketfives.com/online-poker-scene/barney-frank-ron-paul-look-to-end-uigea

It's important that this is bipartisan legislation. As you'll see in the article, pressure is now mounting from all sides to reverse the harm caused by the UIGEA originally.


ill flu (United States) 6,026 Posts. Joined 08-23-2005.
04-14-2008 8:24 PM - In reply to

 How long until we will know if this will go through or not?


TheEngineer (United States) 2,064 Posts. Joined 11-23-2007.
04-14-2008 11:26 PM - In reply to

ill flu: 

 How long until we will know if this will go through or not?

 

We should have a good idea of its prospects within the next few months, but maybe this will go through faster.


TheEngineer (United States) 2,064 Posts. Joined 11-23-2007.
04-14-2008 11:28 PM - In reply to

My latest letter.  As I've sent a few letters recently, this is intentionally short and more casual in tone:

-----------------------

The Honorable Geoff Davis
United States House of Representatives
1108 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20515-1704

Dear Congressman Davis:

I am writing to ask you to cosponsor HR 5767.  HR 5767 places a moratorium on enforcement of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA). 

As you know, many banks have complained about being deputized to interpret and enforce EVERY state and federal Internet gaming law, which is what UIGEA requires.  They complained in comments to Treasury and to the Federal Reserve.  They complained even more at the April 2, 2008 Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Trade and Technology hearing on the impact of UIGEA on our nation’s financial services industry.

One thing the Subcommittee hearing made completely clear is that Congress needs to define “unlawful Internet gambling” before it can expect financial institutions to have any chance at effectively enforcing any ban on such activity.  The idea that the federal government cannot define this concept, yet expects banks to perform this law enforcement function, is ludicrous.  We ought not force our nation's financial institutions to perform this function.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
 
[me]

-------------------

Senator Mitch McConnell
United States Senate
361-A Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator McConnell:

I am writing to ask you to sponsor a moratorium on enforcement of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA) in the Senate.  The corresponding House bill is HR 5767.  

As you know, many banks have complained about being deputized to interpret and enforce EVERY state and federal Internet gaming law, which is what UIGEA requires.  They complained in comments to Treasury and to the Federal Reserve.  They complained even more at the April 2, 2008 House Subcommittee on Domestic and International Monetary Policy, Trade and Technology hearing on the impact of UIGEA on our nation’s financial services industry.

One thing the 2008 Subcommittee hearing made completely clear is that Congress needs to define “unlawful Internet gambling” before it can expect financial institutions to have any chance at effectively enforcing any ban on such activity.  The idea that the federal government cannot define this concept, yet expects banks to perform this law enforcement function, is ludicrous.  We ought not force our nation's financial institutions to perform this function.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,
 
[me]


Dan (United States) 2,216 Posts. Joined 05-01-2006.
04-16-2008 9:57 AM - In reply to

Great example letters. It's important to let your Congressmen know that you want them to support HR 5767 and that you're registered to vote in their district. Both are extremely important to say.


TheEngineer (United States) 2,064 Posts. Joined 11-23-2007.
04-16-2008 4:58 PM - In reply to

Good point, Dan.  I write to my congressman and both Senators frequently and have met with their staffs in D.C.  As they know I vote, I didn't need to mention it. 

For others using my letter as a template:  you should add the fact that you're registered to vote in your district/state to your letter.


TheEngineer (United States) 2,064 Posts. Joined 11-23-2007.
04-17-2008 10:46 PM - In reply to

Rep. Robert Wexler (D-FL) has cosponsored HR 5767.

 


Dan (United States) 2,216 Posts. Joined 05-01-2006.
04-18-2008 3:21 PM - In reply to

Wexler stated on the PocketFives.com Podcast that he was going to co-sponsor HR 5767 as well, so it's good to see this come to fruition:

http://www.pocketfives.com/podcast

 
Return to Top
Page 1 of 1 (10 items)


P5's Member Blogs
Going For Triple Crown...
By Cre8ive - added Nov 04 2009, 02:56 PM
The New Grind Begins
By dtools22 - added Nov 03 2009, 11:22 AM
November starts well
By MakeMeMaster - added Nov 03 2009, 08:51 AM
 
Jordan 'scarface_79' Smith joins us to discuss his 10th place finish in the WSOP Main Event and his other recent large cashes.

P5s Podcast, Nov 5, 2009
Thur, 5 Nov 2009 12:00:00 EST
Ian Ramsey, local counsel for the Interactive Gaming Council, discusses a recent hearing in the Kentucky Supreme Court regarding the potential seizure of online gaming domain names.

P5s Podcast, Oct 29, 2009
Thur, 29 Oct 2009 12:00:00 EST
PocketFives.com Rankings
Rank PLB PRO
1. gboro780 2 1
2. djk123 1 4
3. Jovial Gent 3 3
4. moorman1 5 2
5. Doc Sands 7 6
6. rock3656 4 9
7. govshark2 12 7
8. shaundeeb 18 5
9. ImaLuckSac 11 13
10. Believer82 17 11
Carbon Poker Sorting Tables
Rank PLB
 1. djk123 9290.80
 2. gboro780 8544.39
 3. Jovial Gent 8459.52
 4. rock3656 7973.68
 5. brainwash 7650.78
 6. ImaLuckSac 7509.52
 7. hoodini10 7465.48
 8. govshark2 7429.53
 9. jet5087 7291.03
 10. TravestyFund 7278.15
Go