Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Search Results Showing 1 to 20 of 20 results [Advanced Search]

Re(6): Chip Reese RIP? :(
Idiots but it gets removed very quickly so don't keep them alive by posting them on the forums. That's just what they long for. Attention. RIP Chip. This is a huge shock. One of the greatest legends the game have ever seen gone way too soon. So sad.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Dec 4th, 2007
Re(3): barry greenstein on online poker theory..
lol what'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Dec 2nd, 2007
Re(2): I do not know where to begin, but here it goes....
Lol at the cheaters, I don't see what else I can call you, still coming out saying it is not multiaccounting to buy a SECOND (or third, fourth, fifth or who knows how many they go through) account after busting out once already.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(2): Online Bad Boys Of Poker
No Ozzy was banned not that long ago but it was pretty much silenced to death.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(3): Be Honest With Yourself For a Second...
ooooh aaaaah the MASSIVE speculation!!! Have you been living under a rock''' No I know what it is, you're just another useful/useless (take your pick) brick in the wall protecting the online cheaters. But what a fine idea it is to silence it all to death. Keep things as they are. Things are going so well. Everything will be fine. Everything is fine.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(1): Buying Accounts v. Multiaccounting
It is multiaccounting. Quite simple. And multiaccounting was what ChrisBluffMag was banned for. Not even a grey area imo.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(1): Be Honest With Yourself For a Second...
It's kind of like the traffic. If everyone would just follow the rules there wouldn't be so many problems. Why can't you moron kids just enter one account into one tournament and when you're knocked out or you win then you're done just like everyone else. Don't fucking buy someone else's account. That is multiaccounting and that is cheating you stupid idiots. Of course you all know this but you're too greedy and too immature without any morals whatsoever to apply to common decency. So what you do with your messy morals are one or more of the following: you cheat, you're friends with ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(4): My opinion on the Imp issue (that and a quarter will get you a cup of coffee)
LOL I haven't been here long but I have a feeling that is the stupidest post I'll ever read in my life. You clearly have no clue whatsoever about anything. Least of all what is mature and what is gaining respect. Oooh how we must respect people like Bax and Sheets for keeping their dirty mouths shut. I can't stop laughing even though of course it's quite sad because it pretty much perfectly illustrates why online tournament poker is in the situation that is in now. Greed and stupidity ftw.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(2): My opinion on the Imp issue (that and a quarter will get you a cup of coffee)
How many top ranked or known online tournament players have clearly condemned these practices. Called them what they truly are in clear terms' Anyone' Anyone at all besides this thread' No I think this thread is relevant. At least it's a reminder that not all so called good or skilled online tournament players think that cheating is ok. With the picture that is being painted it is very easy to think that cheating is not only acceptable among these people but with the silence or in some cases support even from well known players, also easy to think that it is something that is commonly ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(1): My opinion on the Imp issue (that and a quarter will get you a cup of coffee)
*applauds* Wish more of the top tournament players took this stance too but I guess maturity is big factor here.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(2): I do not know where to begin, but here it goes....
He had already entered the tournament and been knocked out. Then later played and won on another account. THAT IS multiaccounting and that is cheating. And with everything that has come out lately it is either terrible naive or it is talking against better knowledge to think that his past record is clean.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(1): Thoughts on the Imper1um issue/Cheating
One thing which is funny is that when it came to HU, Kongsgaard disconnected and Sorel who had already busted out, now illegally playing Chris account, proceeded to win just by stealing the blinds as quickly as possible before Kongsgaard could reconnect. That itself of course not very admirable. What is admirable though is that Kongsgaard even then did not take the easy road, cheat and call someone up to one way or the other take over his account. Man I'm glad the cheats didn't win this one too. Guess there is justice sometimes.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(6): I do not know where to begin, but here it goes....
He may or may not be a decent donkament player but even that looks to be tainted now and the "cheater" label seems much more fitting than any "great" player label. What is really sad is that this obviously isn't just the case with him but also the case with realistically most of the top ranked american online donkament players. The picture has been painted and it's very ugly.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 30th, 2007
Re(2): I do not know where to begin, but here it goes....
Thank you for proving mine and other posts in these threads so very right. May you hopefully one day face justice and end up in jail. Thief.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 29th, 2007
Re(8): gus hansen= fish?
This is combined plo and 08 from about Sept until Feb this year: This is hi/lo alone, same period, where he was the biggest winner: This year like i said he is up about 600k in plo and down about the same amount in holdem. But once again up over one million in hi/lo. Some stats from the last three months alone: Horse results are virtually unknown,.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 29th, 2007
Re(7): gus hansen= fish?
Maybe at one point but not the end standings. I have them somewhere and will post them later. Of course when we talk about last year, that's not even 6 months but around, after the wsop, where the high stakes games on full tilt really took off. before that he played as Wadello on UB but that was a shared account so a number of different people playing that one.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 29th, 2007
Re(2): Should Josh Fields AKA JJProdigy be allowed to play at PCA?
Ideally he should face criminal charges.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 29th, 2007
Re(1): I do not know where to begin, but here it goes....
Well that doesn't really change anything since you don't adress the wider issues at all, so I'm gonna repost what I wrote in the other thread. But yes it would be very ironic, but not even unexpected, if this will be a Bluff interview. from the other thread: I think it's becoming clear that a large part of the reason the people are defending these people are of course because they've done, are doing or WOULD do the exact same things. There is no doubt huge amounts of this is going on. In many ways this is poker history repeating itself. Early live poker days where full of cheating and ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 29th, 2007
Re(5): gus hansen= fish?
No that is not so clear. He is only down in nl holdem where he has a very small sample size but up a million plus in O8 and about 600k in Plo. Last year he was also the biggest winner in O8. Over a million and not even down 200k in plo. So no. Despite popular misguided opinion not a clear donator. Massive swings' Of course.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 29th, 2007
Re(5): R.I.P. Imper1um
I agree with this post. And I think it's becoming clear that a large part of the reason the people are defending these people are of course because they've done, are doing or WOULD do the exact same things. There is no doubt huge amounts of this is going on. In many ways this is poker history repeating itself. Early live poker days where full of cheating and other low life shenanigans and early, it is still early, online poker is very much the same and needs to be cleaned up. Sooner rather than later because this is definitely not helping an industry, especially in America, in a lot of ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		cave
Nov 29th, 2007