Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Search Results Showing 1 to 30 of 70 results [Advanced Search]

Re:Better poker player: Dwan or Ungar
I cannot die laughing any harder. Ur right he would not run Stu over. He would systematically dominate every single hand. For so many reasons Dwan would simply crush Stu after about 5 three hour sessions Ungar would be broke. I know old guys like to pretend poker was even decent in Ungar's days compared to today's players but it is simply not true. Im talking cash obv tournies perhaps Stu would win, but not by much. Dwan in a landslidddddddddde. What is this everyone always says about Phil Ivey being better than Dwan' I know everyone likes to worship Ivey cuz they think he is cool ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
May 11th, 2009
Re:I want to die
U want to die over 5K' Dont play poker ever again, seriously.
Posted in: Bad Beats 		JBDenaro157
Apr 24th, 2009
Re:SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN!!
Ur right Zander, poorly worded by me. I was referring to the fact that men and women are all PEOPLE, and on that premise, should have equal rights. Everyone who plays poker on FT is a poker PLAYER, and since ANYONE can get rakeback, I should thus be entitled. I'd say someone would have to be blind def and dumb to argue that all other conditions equal, they would not feel more entitled to rake in my position. Sorry for the blanket statement above, probably should have made another comparison.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 10th, 2009
Re:SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN!!
As I explained, I'm NOT linked to an affiliate. And if I am it's def not their money. It's mine. I do the playing. That's the sense of entitlement. It's rakeBACK to the player, not rake to the invisible man. It's like women wanting equal rights except it's worse because I've already given them at least 10 times as much as everyone else, so I should be more entitled. Ur an idiot Gamble and obv already have rakeback. Good point from Adam and that is the real answer.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 10th, 2009
Re:SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN!!
Sandler that is a good point and you might be correct even though i am about 98% sure i didn't, but even if I did I do not and have not gotten rakeback ever, plus they refuse to tell me who this mysterious affiliate is. I actually wrote this email in capital letters: WHO IS THIS AFFILIATE YOU SPEAK OF' I HAVE NEVER GOTTEN ANY MONEY EVER NOR EVER BEEN IN CONTACT WITH ANY "AFFILIATE". PLEASE TELL ME.... Their response: Our position is unchanged. Please email us if there is anything else we can help you with.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 10th, 2009
Re:SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN!!
Mark you said it exactly right they are basically daring people to start new accounts. I get that same "you are already linked to an affiliate" bull everytime I email. "We are the naive full tilt people and cannot understand since your talking about a situation that possibly means less money for us." Sickening
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 10th, 2009
Re:SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN!!
What they said basically amounted to "Even though you are our best customer of all time we don't give a fuck about you and are trying to steal your money in the fastest way possible. There is no way you'll ever get rakeback so fuck off" (slight paraphrase) Ive honestly never felt so wronged in my life. They don't care about any of their customers and I really feel for anyone who has had a prob with this. I will personally never play there again until I get it.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 10th, 2009
SOMEONE PLEASE EXPLAIN!!
How full tilt can be so fucking stupid........anyone can get rakeback just by signing up today through any of about 100 diff methods, yet their best, most loyal customers who have given them thousands of dollars cannot' I emailed them about 10 times asking the same question and every single time they pretend like they dont know what I am talking about. This is simply the number one most irrational thing ive ever heard of. How can anyone who doesn't have it not feel cheated' I wonder why there are such problems with multiaccounting, its pretty fucking obvious. I apologize for the ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 10th, 2009
Re:biggest score baked out of your mind?
Gershenator u obv don't smoke weed with a 3.82 GPA
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 9th, 2009
Re:JBT449 5/19 in Foxwoods WPT
JBT is still my idol.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Apr 6th, 2009
Re:Yuvee04
Not that this matters at all but in all my years of playing poker and I'm talking millions of hands easily the number one most suspicious thing ive ever seen in my life occurred while playing this guy. I meant to write to support but the second it happened they closed the table and I couldnt save the hand history. Was just a 100 dollar tourney but I raised from sb with 5 10 suited and he called in BB with a red Q 3 suited. The flop came A K 4 all black but not the same suit and I bet and he called. The turn was a 9 so now hes already drawing dead against ATC literally only beating like ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Mar 23rd, 2009
Re:Titantom wins the 1k.....again
Tom is a huge donk luckbox and I could beat him in baseball
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Mar 11th, 2009
Re:What is wrong with stars and why does anyone play there?
It was suited
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Nov 16th, 2008
Re:What is wrong with stars and why does anyone play there?
As i type this..... PokerStars Game #22102012371: Tournament #118935952, $200+$15 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (300/600) - 2008/11/16 18:03:46 ET Table '118935952 1011' 9-max Seat #3 is the button Seat 1: pitoran (31685 in chips) Seat 2: 8lackbeard (7925 in chips) Seat 3: JBDenaro157 (14660 in chips) Seat 4: TURBORIZLING (18600 in chips) Seat 5: mikmik011 (8850 in chips) Seat 6: Gr8barcia (2700 in chips) Seat 7: Sobizzle21 (35070 in chips) Seat 8: bigfella64 (10500 in chips) Seat 9: tattoostud (19110 in chips) TURBORIZLING: posts small blind 300 mikmik011: posts big blind 600 *** ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Nov 16th, 2008
Re:What is wrong with stars and why does anyone play there?
I agree the future for poker would be brighter and I didn't mean to make this a political thread that was obv a joke on obamas tax plan. I mean for real tho How long until first in a multi is 5 tiems the buy in'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Nov 16th, 2008
What is wrong with stars and why does anyone play there?
OMG I cannot take it anymore. What is wrong with stars management' Yesterday I played an omaha tourney with 160 people they had to pay 27 people. That alone is beyond rediculous. Now the heads-up has 288 poeple and 64 get paid' WHo is running this site barack obama' I mean I know this has been talked about at length but since then they have gotten 100 times worse. Do these people realize taht poker players can do math' In the end nobody is gonna make any money on stars except for stars themselves. Sad really
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Nov 16th, 2008
Re:sick spot in the 500r wcoop
As played INSTA CALL
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Sep 19th, 2008
Re:Castellimich putting out death threats...
Scarface and JohnnyGstaks = best posts in thread. Ty guys and I'm still laughing about entire thread in general. Tom is obv one of best with a bat
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Sep 10th, 2008
Re:Whats harder
School is so much easier than 100k+ a year in poker for almost everybody, tho as some mentioned it def depends on school, major etc as it is a very diff skill set.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Sep 8th, 2008
Re:What is your biggest leak?
Getting sucked out on every hand
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Sep 2nd, 2008
Re:POLL: Stars $100r - WWYD?
This is one of the most interesting spots in poker. I prefer check/shove turn without a doubt. I would never bet turn here ever, although I def do see the reasoning why one might. I do not know why anyone would bet/fold here and I think check fold is a better option. Results''' Good post Ape
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Aug 9th, 2008
Re:WOW...Just a disgusting spot in the 530 250k on Stars with AKhh
If by disgusting spot he means easiest snap call in poker history then I agree...level'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Aug 5th, 2008
Re:August goals
1) make it past the first level in a pokerstars tournament 2) <20 bong rips a day 2 guys 1 girl doesn't count Cmoney
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Aug 2nd, 2008
Re:OPR now requires stars players to opt-in
Sweet this will make it much more difficult to see how badly i suck
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Jul 31st, 2008
Re:Who 'runs' the best
1) Moorman - the dude simply does not lose hands period 2) Ari - maybe its just against me he does redic stupid stuff and always wins 3) jcamby/pokerpro - maybe this is just from personal experience ive never won a hand against the guy in my life and his one beat in the million is worth running bad for a year 3) Snowman he is like moorman one of those guys if you play the hand correctly he sucks out on u if u play the hand incorrectly he sucks out on u if u have the second nuts he has the nuts 4) Jamie gold, chris moneymaker etc nuff said (mbn to win the biggest tourney on earth with no fking ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Jul 29th, 2008
Re:Aw:Re:AJKHoosier1 with a solid stack in the FTP $1 million guarantee:)
Congrats man tough riv
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Jul 21st, 2008
Re:MTT players opinion please
The bottom line is that poker is just such a sick game where this can happen to you for literally years (trust me i know). You can be playing near perfectly all the time and simply run bad at all the most important times. The only thing u can do is evaluate every move u make and never go on tilt. Keep playing a lot, but only if you are putting in your A game every time. Be objective in all of your analyses no matter how bad things get, and if you are truly playing at a high level consistently you will win eventually. (I can't believe I just said that its obv not true based on personal ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Jul 17th, 2008
Re:Am I reading this right?
ha thanks, im not too bright at 4am
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Jul 14th, 2008
Am I reading this right?
On ftp right now theASHMAN103 is sitting with 242k on a 25/50 cap PLO game' isnt max buyin 5k' How is this possible' Decent session' -On a side note this is the dumbest game iver ever seen (cap PLO), everyone goes all in every time they enter a pot
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Jul 14th, 2008
Re:yo dont taze me...
He is a very good player and general douche bag...... one of those players who is so young and stupid thinks he is invincible but is not even part of the real world and obv lives in parents basement but thinks he is tough
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		JBDenaro157
Jul 7th, 2008