[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Search Results Showing 1 to 26 of 26 results [Advanced Search]
|
Re:State laws on Poker +1 Thanks for the hard work both of you. Twittered as well Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 29th, 2009 |
|
Re:Article: Internet Gaming Law Threatens Horse Racing Industry Dugg and Twittered. Congrats on the front page thing at Digg. What does whitelisted mean again' Overall great article, keep up the good work! Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 29th, 2009 |
|
Re:Is Russ Hamilton banned from live or online poker... I have held off on posting on this forum, aside from the legislative section. I have put a lot of time researching the UB scandal. I posted a lot on 2+2 about it. I am not familiar with the rules about posting links, send me a private message and I can send you some cliff notes. I am still new to this site and will try to figure out how to start a thread with some interesting stuff on the continued cover-up. That said, Russ was named by the KGC. Even though the KGC is a joke, they wouldn't have named him if it was false. They could be sued. Also, both Annie Duke and Mike Matusow are on ... Posted in: Poker Discussion |
Mookman5
Jun 29th, 2009 |
|
Re:TAKE ACTION: Tell Congress what you think of the Feds' seizure of YOUR money! Sent, Twittered and updated the number from 24K to 31K. Nice, thanks for making everything so easy to send and fill out. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 24th, 2009 |
|
Re:Ask Judge Napolitano to cover the federal govt's war on online poker As of right now, it has been moved up to number 1 on the list, Good work to all who voted. Keep voting to make sure it stays up there. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 13th, 2009 |
|
Re:Ask Judge Napolitano to cover the federal govt's war on online poker Done and Done. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 13th, 2009 |
|
Re:TAKE ACTION: Tell Obama to reverse the DoJ online poker players' fund freeze Skall, yes he did well on TV. TE thanks for the letter, I have also emailed President Obama and Ms. Kaptur of Ohio, even though Ohio is not much help. I even had time to write a letter and send it snail mail. What does this mean about the Briefing Book, where online poker was the top technological issue' Was that just a farce' In any event, good luck in the fight! I will do anything I can to help. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 11th, 2009 |
|
Re:Some questions about this SDNY "freeze"? Donkey, From what I understand the funds frozen, although yours, have been refunded to you poker account, and the sites themselves are eating the loss more the moment, hoping to get this money back through litigation. Soon, your funds on which ever site, can be withdrawn again and cashed. There are other methods in place and the sites are the ones taking the loss for the time being. Be patient and you should be able to get you money in some way soon enough. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 11th, 2009 |
|
Re:PPA's response to the SDNY players' fund freeze Great Podcast TE! Thank you for making it so easy to write letters to Congress and President Obama. It is a shame that those in NY feel the need to seize players money. I have found out how hard it is to get people motivated, close friends even. This gives myself, and the poker community as well I am sure, much admiration for all the hard work you have done to get such a following. The Diggs and twitter alerts are easy and help out alot. Keep fighting the good fight and good luck. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 11th, 2009 |
|
Re:TAKE ACTION: Tell Obama to reverse the DoJ online poker players' fund freeze Thanks for all the hard work! Sent and Twittered, Dugg the articles too. Glad to see people rallying together. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 10th, 2009 |
|
Re:Podcast: Submit Questions for "TheEngineer" Do you see the DOJ now going after other payment processors that are also used' What are you thoughts about the previous ruling that the Wire Act does not apply to poker' I have also heard that this may not apply. If this goes to litigation, and we lose, does that kill any chances for Frank's Bill or UIGEA repeal' What do you have to say to the "PPA Bashers" that the PPA is funded by poker sites and will look out for their best interests' Can you also comment about the supposed conflict of interest of certain PPA boardmembers with affilates' This seems to be a big issue on ... Posted in: Poker Discussion |
Mookman5
Jun 9th, 2009 |
|
Re:What does this mean for the US players? In short, very very short, if The PPA and sites have a court battle vs NY or DOJ, or whomever and A FEW outcomes could arise. From what I understand, the worst case scenario is that the case goes in Favor to the DOJ, thus poker would then be covered under the Wire Act and be deemed illegal. From what I understand this seaizure has nothing to do with UIGEA. However, I am not a legal expert and may be wrong on my analysis. Skallagrim is the man that knows most, he is the lawyer guy. The Engineer is also Informed on this issue. I am not sure what this would mean for legilation like Frank's ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 9th, 2009 |
|
Re:My response to Congressman Bachus' attacks on online poker OMG So funny. Bachus is so clueless. I cannot believe this is even real! Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 3rd, 2009 |
|
Re:PPA Advocacy Booth During All Six Weeks of the WSOP Lucky Intern! Great booth setup. From what I gathered, are there computers there setup so people can sign up to the PPA' Are these computers also used so people can send letters to their Congressmen' Overall great effort, how has the traffic been' Have alot of people been stopping by to support the cause' Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 3rd, 2009 |
|
Re:It's Barney vs. Bachus! Please VOTE YES on this US News & World Report Poll Nice, Dugg and Voted Yes. Sorry I have not been on as much lately. Bachus is a crazy guy. Good thing the Poll shows a vast majority have voted yes. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
Jun 3rd, 2009 |
|
Re:Washington Post: The NFL's Claims of Moral Ground on Betting Lost With Lotto Deals What are the chances of getting the AGA on our side' Would some more of the B&M Casino's be in favor of online poker, especially during this economic downturn' The initial startup of an online poker room may cost some money, but over time it would cost less than a normal card room. No dealers to pay, no free drinks given away, etc. Off the top of my head I forget which Casino's Harrahs owns. I do not think they own The Wynn, The Venetain, The Bellagio, or Caesars. Maybe I got one wrong. You would think that during these tought times, these casinos would be looking for any ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 26th, 2009 |
|
Re:Washington Post: The NFL's Claims of Moral Ground on Betting Lost With Lotto Deals Do groups like MLB, NBA, and NCAA in hold the same position as the NFL' Do they contribute money to the opposition' Am I wrong to assume that Soccer, and to some extent Tennis, in Europe, actually embrace things like Betfair' It would appear it brings more fans aside from those who play or used to play those sports. The NFL situation seems so hypocritical, even now since they are endorsing lottery tickets. I am also confused about the American Gaming Association, are they neutral in the matter' Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 26th, 2009 |
|
Re:Washington Post: The NFL's Claims of Moral Ground on Betting Lost With Lotto Deals Wow, I had no idea that the Wire Act was amended to include interent poker b/c of this, a shame really. As for the UB scandal, an not to get off topic, but the scandal was even going on while UB was a publicly traded company, the cheating started in 2004. I wish it could have been exposed while UB was public, then more could have been done. I am going have to read up on H.R. 4411 as I somehow missed this and just assumed UIGEA was all there was to hurt interent poker. I am also behind on Frank's new bill. How much opposition will there be' From the NFL, FoF, or others' It seems with ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 25th, 2009 |
|
Re:Washington Post: The NFL's Claims of Moral Ground on Betting Lost With Lotto Deals OMG Why did you do that to me' LOL, I may start a crusade on the NFL similar to my UB efforts. I cannot believe that crap they put out. "UIGEA also enjoyed a broad array of supporters, including 49 state Attorneys General and other law enforcement associations, several major financial institutions and technology companies, dozens of religious and family organizations, and of course our sports organizations." "When it passed the House a year ago, the vote was 317-93, including majorities of both caucuses and with the affirmative votes of both party leaders" Wasn't ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 25th, 2009 |
|
Re:Tracking the New Poker Bills Thanks for the link. I have their emails and snail mail, I will write. The link you gave me was great, but when I click on the Name of the person, then the contact option, it gives me an error message that the alert is no longer there. I am not sure if that matters, but I figured I would let you know. It is too bad not many P5'ers come and check out this section. I was torn to start posting on this site but I hate to see your hard work "fall on deaf ears" so to speak. Anything I can do to help, feel free to let me know. Kudos for all the work on Digg and Twitter, as well as ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 25th, 2009 |
|
Re:Washington Post: The NFL's Claims of Moral Ground on Betting Lost With Lotto Deals "Owners this week gave their approval for teams to put their logos on lottery tickets, in exchange for a piece of the action." Words cannot describe how much I loathe the NFL, and it is not b/c I am a Browns fan. The NFL appears to be a bunch of self-serving jerks, clearly having no idea how stupid there stance on Gambling has become. Logo's on Lottery Tickets' The lottery! I must stop before my head explodes. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 25th, 2009 |
|
Re:Miami Herald: Poker players push 'game of skill' argument to lawmakers "If the federal government deems poker a skill game, it would be exempt from the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act that passed Congress in 2006." As so many poker players have said on TV "One Time!" "The law cast a cloud over the legality of Internet gaming, and prompted some websites to no longer accept U.S. players." Question: Worse case scenario, none of the bills pass and the UIGEA regs. go in to place, would there still be a chance to fight the UIGEA for poker' Or do the regs. that have to be in place by December put an end to the "grey ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 25th, 2009 |
|
Re:Tracking the New Poker Bills Thanks for putting in the time to compose all this information. I am sad to see that Ohio is not on that list. In any case, I hope the player and PPA can gather as much support as possible. It really seems with these bills coing to light that poker and players are fighting hard for the right to play. Thanks TE. Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 25th, 2009 |
|
Re:Harrah’s Launches New Online Subsidiary for the WSOP; One Step Closer to Offering Online Poker Another good reason, aside from Harrah's monetary contributions, would be U.S. regulation once the bill passes. This would mean there is no longer a need for the Kahnawake Gaming Commission or MIT. The regulation and monitoring would actually mean something, and not just a rubber stamp. Also The opportunity for news business in hosting severs and development would bring money and jobs to the U.S. I would also think there would be great Tax benefits. These sites would bring in alot of money and as companies be taxed accordingly. This money would no longer be sent offshore to some ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 24th, 2009 |
|
Re:Poker Players Alliance Exec. Dir. John Pappas on the P5s Podcast Good to know. Thanks for the quick response. I also just added you as a friend on Digg and bookmarked your page. I will check it frequently. I am also on facebook. I have added the Poker Players Alliance, but was sad to see no mention of your work, or links on the PPA's info page. I made a wall post plugging your Twitter and Digg pages, but was hoping you could get the PPA page to add it in the info section. The only websites are to the PPA homepage and to the PPA twitter page, but you are much more active. Any chance getting your sites on the info page, or somewhere on this PPA ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 24th, 2009 |
|
Re:Poker Players Alliance Exec. Dir. John Pappas on the P5s Podcast TE, I thank you for all the support you have done. I forgot I made this account, but once I heard you couldn't post your Digg links, I thought that was a shame. I am not a big fan of this site, or it UB adverts. This is the only section I will post in, as my views on the topic I am most interested in will not be well received and most likely get me banned. I will be glad to support you still. Thanks for all the hard work! I know we both want the same thing and hopefully we can reach these goals for all poker players Nationwide. Is this my first post, nuthugging TE, wow who would have ... Posted in: Poker Legislation |
Mookman5
May 24th, 2009 |

