[x]Register Now
Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local
Search Results Showing 1 to 30 of 120 results [Advanced Search]
|
Re(4): Whats the most times the same hand has been dealt to you back to back? There have been over 10 billion hands dealt on pokerstars. Wouldn't that mean that it's likely happened 5 times in their history' Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Oct 18th, 2007 |
|
Re(1): PARTY POKER.... If you look at Annette_15's recent scores page, she has no qualifying results from Party that count. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
May 19th, 2007 |
|
Re(2): You cannot dispute: I made sickest call, ever. the pre flop raise made me 70% sure he had deuces and the nail biting made me more than twice as sure - so therefore, to sum up, once again I WAS 150% SURE HE HAD DEUCES. Bad reasoning. I know you're exaggerating, but you obviously can't add mutually exclusive percentages together. More appropriately you'd say something like: The pre-flop raise by itself made made me 70% certain he had 22. The nail-biting by itself would have made me 90% certain he had 22. Those two probabilities together are then 70% + 30% * 90%, or 97% sure he had 22. Notice, like it or not,that you can never be 100% ... Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
May 12th, 2007 |
|
Re(4): Text Message Updates now up on PocketFivesLive! Below, Can you elobrate more on the angle you used when spilling your drink' Trying to figure out how you used this to get the guy to do what you wanted. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Apr 20th, 2007 |
|
Re(2): johnnydrama's article Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Mar 3rd, 2007 |
|
Re(1): Chuck Norris reading Chuck Norris jokes Johnny Bax was once faced with the decision of calling a guy down with a pair of 7s while holding 79. The donkey opponent (with a missed flush draw) sweated in fear, and Bax bellowed a mighty "I call" that tore a hole in the fabric of space/time, resulting in the very invention of poker itself. The donkey, upon realizing the recursive nature of the game, ran away from the table and his head exploded. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Feb 10th, 2007 |
|
Re(1): Did he rape her? Why has notashark not replied in this thread to justify himself' Maybe he realizes how the rest of the sane world views his story and is scared shitless. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Feb 3rd, 2007 |
|
Re(1): true or false? Definitely rape and don't really want to let this issue drop until he admits it and gets some help. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Feb 2nd, 2007 |
|
Re(1): Neteller Hacked You didn't fall vicitim to to FullTilt 10K Giveaway scam last week did you' Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Dec 12th, 2006 |
|
Re(6): Per OT Special Request: promised pics " " " " guys with 19 " penises' Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Dec 11th, 2006 |
|
Re(1): poker movies And who could forget this set: Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Dec 11th, 2006 |
|
Re(1): anyone else addicted to wikipedia Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Nov 4th, 2006 |
|
Re(2): Rankings... That would then discourage people from playing when they hit a huge score. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Nov 1st, 2006 |
|
Re(4): According to CardPlayer, Internet Poker is NOT Illegal Ape, That's misinformation as well. This bill does nothing to change the legality of hosting a poker site for online players. If hosting a poker site was illegal before, it's still illegal. If it wasn't illegal before this bill, it's still not illegal, and with the vague wording of such bills as the Wire Act of 1961, the question of legality can not be as definitely stated as you have done here. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Oct 5th, 2006 |
|
Re(4): Price is Right Bidding The sad thing is, if he had stuck with 420 on the second one (instead of going up to 1420), he would have won. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Sep 22nd, 2006 |
|
Re(1): When a Race Isn't a Race. What about HURRY-SCURRY It still has the implication of a race (perhaps even with the headstart connotataion - one has to scurry to catch up), with the added implication of confusion, disorder, and haste (as if one of the participants may have really not wanted to have gotten into the situation). Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Sep 9th, 2006 |
|
Re(1): When a Race Isn't a Race. SEESAW makes the most sense to me so far. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Sep 8th, 2006 |
|
Re(6): A challenging Math problem Doesn't this imply that if player 2 had x+2 coins, the event of having more tails or more heads is still mutually exclusive and the probability is still 1/2' And for that matter if player 2 had x+y more coins' This doesn't seem intuitive if its the case. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Aug 31st, 2006 |
|
Re(1): A challenging Math problem Out of x coins, both player 1 and player 2 have an expected outcome of tossing x/2 heads. Since player 2, has x+1 coins, the problem can be reduced to the chance that player 2 tosses heads with his final coin. The answer is 50% for any x. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Aug 31st, 2006 |
|
Re(1): Remember when the kooks all said we're going to FREEZE? I think a lot of people don't understand this concept because "Global Warming" is a bit of a misnomer. The effects of global warming, a thinning of the ozone layer, doesn't imply that it's always going to be warmer, it implies that the earth can't sustain sustain normal temperatures in it's atmosphere. In a nutshell, this means we will experience extreme temperatures on both sides of the scale: WARMER summers, and COLDER winters. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Jul 25th, 2006 |
|
Re(5): P5'er Wins WSOP ME - Automatically ranked #1 ? Being in the rankings doesn't have anything to do with being a pocketfiver. If you look through the list, you'll find a few people whose names aren't in bold because they aren't members. I think a lot of people come to the site after becoming ranked. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Jul 24th, 2006 |
|
Re(4): Yikes, this 9/11 conspiracy stuff is getting deeper and deeper MUPoker, I was responding to The Alchemist who said the Q33NY thing creeped him out. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Jul 22nd, 2006 |
|
Re(2): Yikes, this 9/11 conspiracy stuff is getting deeper and deeper except that Q33 is a sequenece of letters that has nothing to do with anything related to 9/11 OMG!! We're all part of the conspiracy! "P5S OFF TOPIC" HAS 11 CHARACTERS TOO! Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Jul 22nd, 2006 |
|
Re(3): OT: Beerpong Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Jul 21st, 2006 |
|
Re(1): ???? for Cal, Adam, Lenny From my understanding, the players to watch page is not a page 2 of the rankings. It's a different acknowledgement altogether, and the players on that page, although they may be just as good as ranked players, don't necessarily fit the playing requirements for the ranked list. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Jul 19th, 2006 |
|
Re(5): Official Action Jeff Party Discussion/Prediction Thread Why can't he be holding the SHIFT key down as he's typing his name in ALL CAPS and hit the 5 key when trying to press the "R" in GARZA' Also, jmaltz, IE users don't have to type in br tags, they only need to hit the carriage return. Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Jul 18th, 2006 |
|
Re(1): Did I violate the POker Rules of engagement? Actually, under most hold'em tournament rules it's okay to lie about your cards, but if you tell the truth and your hand is revealed, you must forfeit your chips. UPDATE: I've found a rule book which includes the following: 35. Verbally disclosing the true contents of your hand will cause the hand to be killed and a penalty will be assessed. 35a. A player cannot verify the contents of a live hand that was verbally disclosed. Only a director or floorperson may check those contents after the hand is over, but before the pot has been awarded. If the hand is verified but is not in violation ... Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Jul 14th, 2006 |
|
Re(3): The great Tiffany Williamson joins team Pacific poker I'm not saying her move was respectable, I'm saying she wasn't contemplating a call for all her chips there. It was all an act, including the "I... uh....I" while lifting chips towards the pot and bringing them back. No time during that charade did she plan on calling. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Jul 9th, 2006 |
|
Re(1): The great Tiffany Williamson joins team Pacific poker I don't think for a second that Tiffany was contemplating a call with KJ in that famous scene on ESPN. I think it was a blatant psycological game she was playing with the Shiek, and anyone who sees her as a donkey is only looking at the surface of what they are shown on tv. Posted in: Poker Discussion |
PokerPro11
Jul 9th, 2006 |
|
Combination of letters with more pronunciations than -OUGH? I seriously don't think there's a group of letters that has more ways of pronunciation than the English -OUGH. Here's what I've come up with: COUGH (as in OFF) BOUGH (as in COW) ROUGH (as in STUFF) THOUGH (as in LOW) THROUGH (as in FLEW) Posted in: Off Topic |
PokerPro11
Jul 9th, 2006 |

