Check out our brand new Local Poker Communities! Get updates and interact with poker players in your area.
Visit the United States Poker Community | Visit the California Poker Community | Read more about the Launch of P5s Local

Search Results Showing 1 to 30 of 201 results [Advanced Search]

Re:Very shady results on cake, please look.
did that really happen'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Mar 13th, 2009
Re:Very shady results on cake, please look.
how is that comment really relevant... we get it, people can change names.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Mar 12th, 2009
Re:Very shady results on cake, please look.
right...50k guarantee, 100k guarantee, two 30Rs, $100 20k guarantee, $200 wsop sat, etc...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Mar 12th, 2009
Re:Very shady results on cake, please look.
ok, so there is a good chance that at least one of them is someone good/well-known who changes his name every week and only plays cake on sundays. thanks for responding however, you'd think someone like that would be playing more than just the one tournament on that day... neither of them played in the other tournament. but whatever, I mean I'm sure it really is a coincidence, I just wish I was that lucky. Fck.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Mar 12th, 2009
Re:Very shady results on cake, please look.
Honestly' bc i've made 25k there, have generally run well, and have never had a problem cashing out. I'm simply sharing an observation...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Mar 12th, 2009
Very shady results on cake, please look.
This past weekend on sunday, as usual, cake poker ran its two biggest tournaments - the 50k and 100k guaranteed tournaments, with $100 and $150 buyins, respectively. I was at the final table of one of them pretty much until the end. The player who won seemed to never show down and essentially win every hand he played. I am not one to jump to conclusions and make any accusations, but something didn't feel right, so i sharkscoped him. nothing. when the tournament ended the result came up, and it was his first tournament on the site. He did not satellite in, and he played that tournament, ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Mar 12th, 2009
Re:PLO: hu against someone who raises every hand.
thanks, you're right. i'm not raising/reraising the flop enough in spots that are clearly profitable with the % of flops hes betting.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Apr 11th, 2008
PLO: hu against someone who raises every hand.
If you limp, they raise pot every time. if they are sb, they raise pot every time. if they raise and you reraise, they call every time. im just starting to play a lot of $25/$50 hu plo on a small site and im doing ok so far. however, the people I seem to have by far the most trouble with are the ones who are ultra-aggressive preflop. Once you start calling every hand, it becomes really difficult to know where you're at in a hand, and im finding myself thrown off balance by the strategy as a whole. Can anyone offer some advice/suggestions as to how to play against this strategy'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Apr 11th, 2008
Re(1): My Email Exchange With Full Tilt After Chat Ban
you come off as such a condescending douche
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Mar 2nd, 2008
Re(2): THE__D__RY AT EPT FT RIGHT NOW - WATCH on EPTLIVe.COM
tim vance pls kill self immed... could not be more annoying
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Feb 23rd, 2008
Re(1): rigged obv
LOL
Posted in: Bad Beats 		spikedag
Feb 11th, 2008
6th place is greeat....oh wait...no.
7.5k guarantee $30 on cake, 6 left Hand #1408182861002260: Tournament Table 21 Seat 1: qwerty321 (76481.00 in chips) Seat 2: thekid213 (248324.00 in chips) Seat 5: spikedag (93024.00 in chips) Seat 7: juiceeeeeee (225299.00 in chips) Seat 8: SHIP IT!!! (78900.00 in chips) Seat 10: Smebers (117972.00 in chips) qwerty321 posts ante of $500 thekid213 posts ante of $500 spikedag posts ante of $500 juiceeeeeee posts ante of $500 SHIP IT!!! posts ante of $500 Smebers posts ante of $500 thekid213: posts small blind $2,500 spikedag: posts big blind $5,000 Dealt to spikedag [ Jh Qc ] juiceeeeeee: ...
Posted in: Bad Beats 		spikedag
Feb 11th, 2008
Re(2): Matusow blatantly admits to cheating online...
Fair enough. I was wrong. Thank you for addressing the situation w/ class.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Feb 8th, 2008
Re(6): Matusow blatantly admits to cheating online...
Nice quoting FTP's ToS' Another completely irrelevant response. Way to avoid every point I made. This isn't about the site it was played on. It is about HIM. Jesus you are being difficult.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Feb 8th, 2008
Re(6): Matusow blatantly admits to cheating online...
I a site worthy of mention that condones this activity. You seem to have a knack for completely missing the point, which is that the general poker community does not approve of this kind of activity. But still, I ask you to find a site that approves of this. You are the only person on P5s arguing in his favor. Do you really think you're the only person who knows right from wrong'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Feb 8th, 2008
Re(6): Matusow blatantly admits to cheating online...
Name a site worthy of mention that condones this sort of activity.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Feb 8th, 2008
Re(4): Matusow blatantly admits to cheating online...
lol... Dyzalot, consistently the most self-righteous and condescending poster on this site. Always manages to come off as obnoxious. I'm not really sure why you always insist on playing devils advocate...I think you just like arguing. You can't just "assume" it was on Mikes account. If it was, you're creating a petty argument over the definition of cheating, when all that matters is that he violated the FTP Terms of Service by having multiple people play on one account. The whole point of this post is that other people have been BANNED from FTP for violating the TOS. Whether or not that ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Feb 8th, 2008
Re(1): What is your best comeback in a SNG?
5 chips FTW.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Jan 11th, 2008
Re(1): Full Tilt 45-man ROI
please...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Jan 2nd, 2008
Full Tilt 45-man ROI
I'm sure this has been asked/answered before but I searched and couldn't find the answers I was looking for. What is considered a good ROI for the 45-man sng's on full tilt' (they're not turbo) Obviously the answer is different across the different stakes, as a higher ROI is achievable at the $10+1 level relative to the $69+6, hopefully I can get answers for both etc... thanks.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Jan 2nd, 2008
what do you do w AA here?
Full Tilt Poker Game #4565279021: $10 + $1 Sit & Go (34612832), Table 5 - 20/40 - No Limit Hold'em - 12:56:09 ET - 2007/12/20 Seat 1: nhl76 (1,450) Seat 2: spikedag (2,410) Seat 3: triplej (1,200) Seat 4: noah1204 (1,430) Seat 5: Scott2011 (1,355) Seat 7: KIMBERLY87 (605) Seat 8: Gods Ghosts Me (1,450) Seat 9: harinarine (3,600) noah1204 posts the small blind of 20 Scott2011 posts the big blind of 40 The button is in seat #3 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to spikedag [Ac Ah] KIMBERLY87 folds Gods Ghosts Me folds harinarine folds nhl76 folds Scott2011: cool KIMBERLY87: were ...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Dec 20th, 2007
longest no cash streak...
between both stars and full tilt i have gone 50 tourneys straight w no cash... anyone done worse'
Posted in: Bad Beats 		spikedag
Dec 17th, 2007
Re(2): winning tournaments vs maximizing EV
umm... sngs -> more important to focus on making the money mtts -> play to win, FTW!!! etc... i think youre confused about sngs being responsible for developing the play to win attitude...or maybe you're playing them wrong'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Nov 12th, 2007
Re(2): Top Online Pros Please Step Inside
calbandgreat got lucky once and thinks people care about his opinion he also clearly lacks simple reading comprehension...zpaceman actually went out of his way to say the he IS NOT A TOP PRO cal, your post has nothing whatsoever to do with this thread or its ultimate point, not that this one does either, but just saying... fckng keep it to yourself douche
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Nov 4th, 2007
Re(2): Bounty Tourneys
yes, you get less when you win...but it reduces your overall variance. many times that you don't make the money you will recoup more than your buy in etc
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Nov 3rd, 2007
Re(3): What have you bought with Poker winnings?
i wonder how many pounds of weed get purchased yearly w poker winnings by users on this site...
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Oct 31st, 2007
Re(3): AK, call or fold, no real reads
result' foldament'
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Oct 28th, 2007
Re(2): vietcong01 - a new style of poker?
lol he is so gross...his scores actually make me gag/vom
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Oct 18th, 2007
Re(1): I never wanted to stand up before but now i must
there you have it, ladies and gentlemen. wp, GG AP for the 99th time.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Oct 18th, 2007
Re(1): Omaha hi/lo hand
i think you need to raise the flop where you called, or potentially lead out. I dont think check/calling here is good at all. Your draws are favored over essentially anything, certainly including dry aces. as played the river is a tough spot, im not really sure.
Posted in: Poker Discussion 		spikedag
Oct 17th, 2007