Online Poker Tournament Rankings

 
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Search

You searched for the word(s): userid:42564
Page 1 of 67 (665 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
  • Re:itgigglebox on stars sunday million...FU pal your play is horrible..

    Anyone else hoping LtGiggleBox goes on to ship this thing ?? I know I am !!
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 08-23-2009
  • Re:itgigglebox on stars sunday million...FU pal your play is horrible..

    Can someone please keep this thread updated with how LtGiggleBox is going ??
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 08-23-2009
  • Re:itgigglebox on stars sunday million...FU pal your play is horrible..

    GG LtGiggleBox .. unlucky :( At least you cashed which is now about 500x OPs bankroll !!!
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 08-23-2009
  • Re:The Wretchy Saga comes to an end

    Seems like the only difference between JJProdigy and Wretchy is that at least JJ was 'intelligent' enough to come up with an explanation (albeit a completely stupid and unbelievable one) straight away, whereas Wretchy took over a week to come up with an equally ridiculous explanation. Andy McLeod pretty much hit the nail on the head (as he often does), and I think anyone that believes a single word of Wretchy's explanation is delusional. lol @ his designated cash game account playing
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 05-18-2009
  • Re:The Wretchy Saga comes to an end

    1 accout or 40 ... it's still cheating. I guess if you want to rank cheaters JJ is worse, but I tend to think that they should all be lumped together as it's the actions of all of them combined who bring down the reputation of the game. One could argue that seeing the damage JJ has done, and the fact that the sites have gone to great lengths to clear up loopholes and misconceptions surrounding MA-ing that anyone who continues to multi-account is actually worse than JJ.
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 05-18-2009
  • Re:LOOKING TO TAKE THE LEAP AS A PRO

    I would guess that in the 4-5 years that I've been reading PocketFives.com I've probably read hundreds, maybe even a thousand "should I turn pro" posts. Funnily enough, 99% of them were told it was a terrible idea, but 99% of them did it anyway. Not surprisingly, most of them have never been heard from again. If you have to ask if you should turn pro - the answer is almost certainly a resounding no.
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 04-14-2009
  • Re:world series of poker challenge

    I would gladly wear an Enron / Jeb Bush for President / Kill the Whales patch if they gave me a Buffet line pass. So I really can't see myself turning down $$ for wearing a small patch. I'd probably let them tattoo my forehead if the price was right !!!
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 04-06-2009
  • Re:Australian poker players unite

    OP, your information is completely incorrect. I have received a personal assurance from Senator Conroy's office that legit poker sites such as Stars and FullTilt will NOT be affected by the proposed filter. Feel free to PM me if you would like more information on this topic.
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 03-29-2009
  • Re:-So I got kicked out of the Venetian poker room

    Sounds like you had already made your decision and just wanted a bit more 'Hollywood' time. Once the clock was called maybe you should have thought about the hand, rather than getting into an arguement with another player ?? Saying you didn't have enough time is ridiculous - by your own accout you had 2 minutes and 20 seconds. If you can't make a decision in that amount of time playing 1/2 NL then you might want to re-evaluate your game.
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 03-29-2009
  • Re:Australian poker players unite

    I have just had a phone call from a friend who works for a Federal MP where I was given the following information. The list which was published on the wikileaks site IS indeed a blacklist of banned Internet sites, but it's not the Federal Government's list. It is the blacklist of a private internet filtering company - similar to NetNanny and many similar products out there which individuals can purchase for their home computers. The Federal Government's list DOES NOT INCLUDE legitimate
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by luckyshades on 03-29-2009
Page 1 of 67 (665 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »