Online Poker Tournament Rankings

 
Bodog
$100K Guaranteed
Every Sunday! 
Sign Up Today!
Rakeback
Get cash back after
playing poker!
Sign up now!
CarbonPoker 
$15,000 Rake Chase
Plus 30% Rakeback!
Cake Poker 
33% Rakeback
$25k extra each month!

Search

You searched for the word(s): userid:46206
Page 1 of 21 (202 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »
  • Re:Tiffany Michelle on Amazing Race - is this old news?

    [quote user="tommy34"] cool story bro [/quote] thanks, tool. It was a simple yes/no question...no story involved whatsoever. Apes, feel free to delete the entire thread for all I care. My question was answered.
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 09-11-2009
  • Tiffany Michelle on Amazing Race - is this old news?

    It's completely new news to me - so forgive me if this is old news or repeat post. Sigh.
    Posted to Off Topic (Forum) by kgil33 on 09-11-2009
  • Re:Dude cheating playing on his brothers name

    OP did the right thing WillyWoo absolutely owns this thread.
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 08-31-2009
  • Re:Live Sattellite hand - debate over how to play it...

    Anyone, please? This seems standard shove to me. I guess I'm looking for confirmation and reasons for against any of the other options. Am I missing any info?
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 08-10-2009
  • Re:Live Sattellite hand - debate over how to play it...

    [quote user="lordxixor101"] What are the average stacks at this point in the tournament? How are blinds looking for the near term. Because, to be honest, if she's 5th in chips right now, and the top 4 stacks are all at her table, this is at best a flat, since you can't shove into them. I think reads on the bigger stacks play out here. Assuming she's around 90th or so in chips, I don't think folding is an option, so how are the bigger stacks playing? If she makes it about
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 08-10-2009
  • Re:Live Sattellite hand - debate over how to play it...

    [quote user="Goal4Ziggy"] Just shove, live people are clueless, you aren't close enough to the seat and you have AK. Flatting would be awful because you don't want a caller behind you and a shove with this action could even fold out a pair as big as TT. I'm guessing your friend who thinks that flatting is the best option is arguing that no one will reshove with worse so there is no point in shoving but he is wrong because someone might call behind with like 88 or AJ or something
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 08-10-2009
  • Re:Live Sattellite hand - debate over how to play it...

    I agree - but that's why the thread is here. Trying to learn/get thoughts from others to see why other options might be valid. edit: that was for optika's reply but I can't seem to get his quote in here....sigh
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 08-10-2009
  • Re:Live Sattellite hand - debate over how to play it...

    [quote user="optika11329"] there is no debate here - you are a million miles away from the bubble - so no ICM factors - what are you hoping for? if you had a seat locked, it was the CL who limped and you are 2 off the bubble - im listening - this hand deserves zero debate - and your donkey friends who say flat are clueless! (sorry im in a bad mood and being blunt) [/quote] LOL....np man. I agree 100000% Turns out UTG limped with 44 (absolutely horrible), UTG +1 RR with TT (also absohorrid
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 08-10-2009
  • Live Sattellite hand - debate over how to play it...edit/results

    Winstar Casino on the OK/TX border. $440 sat. to the ME which has a 3M guarantee. 450 entered (plus unknown # of alternates). At least 100 will get seats and there is ~186 left when this hand comes up that a friend was in. 600/1200/100 (ten handed) UTG limps (~5k behind) UTG +1 raises to 3600 (also ~5k behind) fold fold Hero AsKs, stack of 18K remaining 5 that havent acted all have 20-25K stacks. There are obviously 4 options. Fold. Flat. Raise (but not shove). Shove. Most of our discussion amongst
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 08-10-2009
  • FTP (micro stakes) rake question

    So I am sitting in my continuing education seminar and decide to play 1c/2c Omaha to kill time. I split a multiway pot with another player and noticed I still lost money (granted, only 1c total) so I went to look for FTPs rake info page. Either my search skills failed, or they don't have info on it. They raked 18c on a 1c/2c game. I find it odd that they'd rake 9x the bb. Is it just me? It's not the money (obviously) - it's the % of rake v stakes that blew me away. Does FTP have a
    Posted to Poker Discussion (Forum) by kgil33 on 07-26-2009
Page 1 of 21 (202 items) 1 2 3 4 5 Next > ... Last »