Online Poker Tournament Rankings

[quote user="13Jayhawk13"]Are you sure that's true? I was told that this is not true by a supposed macgenious at a bestbuy store. Guy could have been full of shit, but maybe someone could confirm. [/quote] I run a 28 IInc ($330 i think? and I love it), so the vid card has plenty of power to do that, as far as turning the imac into a monitor idk, my advice is to buy the laptop, a non apple monitor, the mac mini, and a bluetooth mouse\keyboard (rocketfish from bbuy is my choice) that

[quote user="bbbbb33"]had mbp for about a month, love the thing. only problem... i have the mini dvi adapter and can hook it up to my 30in dell but am not able to change the resolution on the dell to anything better than 1280x1000. can anyone help? [/quote] might be the monitor, or the cord, I think I have the mini dvi to hdmi converter and I have mine at 1920X1280 (I think, I'll check when I get home)

I think once the people who so staunchly oppose the bill realize just how much money it could mean for there state they will have no choice but go with it, do you want to be the representative that tells your voting public that their kids don't have text books because you didn't want to pass a law that you thought might be morally questionable? there will be a select few extremist who do but voters will weed them out, nothing motivates the American people like money. and fwiw for those who

[quote user="tyson219"]I agree. At the same time, assuming you're a successful player, it's -EV to play $11 ABI when your bankroll allows you to play $44 ABI (assuming # of tables is constant and ROI makes $44 ABI more profitable). [/quote] [quote user="tyson219"]I agree. At the same time, assuming you're a successful player, it's -EV to play $11 ABI when your bankroll allows you to play $44 ABI (assuming # of tables is constant and ROI makes $44 ABI more profitable

[quote user="tyson219"] I think it's the entire roll. The point of BR management is to make sure you don't go broke in a bad downswing -- not that you don't go broke on one site. It's true that moving money between will be more difficult, but not impossible. [/quote] thought about this and I have to disagree, the point is not to avoid being broke, it's about having the ability to play. if your +EV in a tournament then not playing that tournament is -EV right? so regardless

this is clearly subjective, it really depends on your ability\willingness to transfer, once it becomes so hard to xfr that your worried about it (like now) then with the entire objective of BR management (as I understand it) being to avoid going broke you would have to treat each site like a different roll. If you lose your roll on one site you cant play those tournaments which would be -EV and have the same effect as going busto. *edited* ( I included some extra thoughts in the opening sentence

your right, assuming that wouldn't be a factor would be bad, but is that the right side of the equation? I think the ability to reload would decrease the risk of going bust so really we would need to adjust the risk of going bust by the probability of being able to reload and then plug it into our formula, something like this maybe? (expected probability of reloading) (the risk of going bust) = A (A)(-EV of being bust)+(EV 11ABI) >\=\< (+EV of 44 ABI)(A)

"According to my estimates over 80% of each dollar deposited to these sites gos to the sites, less than 20% is returned to the winning players." <-- pretty big leap for me to make without some sort of proof, if your going to post numbers you authored you should most definitely post the proofs of your work. the flow of money is not cyclical in the overall since, it flows upward. your deposit is taken by someone better than you, his by someone better than him and so on. at the upper levels