Online Poker Tournament Rankings

Go and get a lesson from Jennifear. She can answer all your questions and teach you how to crush SNGs. Your plan may be a little unrealistic, but could be possible depending on how much volume you can put in. ROIs vary greatly depending on what level SNG you are playing. However if you Sharkscope some of the winners on a site you can see what ROI levels they win at. Low level SNGs (below $20) seem to be crushed by 20% ROIs or so. As you move up the scale, 5% is a winning player at the $50 level and

40% ROI is very high even for $16 turbos. How big is your sample size? Even 500 samples is not high enough to verify a ROI for SNGs. However I am sure that you cannot maintain that ROI, or anywhere close to it at the $50 level, even if you are one tabling. Regardless, do the math. 6 $16 SNGs per 6 hours is probably more than you are currently producing. Thats $96 in buy ins and $134 in winnings. Net = $38/day. Assume you play 25 days per month and that adds up to $950/mos. Not bad for bankroll building

Anyone else having trouble connecting to their site tonight? I am in several tournaments and not connecting to any there.... I can get here and everywhere else on the internet....

I couldnt get on for about 5 minutes and then I got back on. This is the only time this month I have had a problem. Very annoying since I was blinded out of two SNGs during that time.

I play a lot of poker JustKLLinITQ, what can I say. When you play a lot, you get to see everything and I have. And oh yes I am serious as a heart attack. If you multi-tabled 6-8 tables or more for years, you will see a lot of hands too.

You guys must not play that much! I have had over 35 of them since I started playing in 2003. I have played over 10 million hands over the years but I am still running ahead of the one royal per 650,000 hand expectation. And yes I say over 35 cause I stopped counting.....

Online cash games have progressed dramatically as Prodigy was saying. The three betting light philosophy has destroyed the profitability of the old TAG or LAG raise and Cbet philosophy. The old TAG or LAG and Cbet philosophy had been successful in live games for many years and it still is. However, because of the speed that the game progresses online, online players are now FAR ahead on average of where the average live player is. The average live player rarely gets reraised preflop, let alone 3

There was always more to the TAG or LAG style than just C-bets. I just used that as a style descriptor.

The answer you seek is here: http://www.pocketfives.com/poker-articles/Set-Mining-2426250

Also left out was the development of the concept of floating as an initial response to the basic TAG or LAG style that soon became incorporated into both styles as well before the 3 bet phase began.