Harry Reid Pushing for Online Poker Legislation in Senate

12

On Friday, the Wall Street Journalpublished an article about the efforts by U.S. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV, pictured) to legalize and regulate online poker. Reid is “circulating” a bill dubbed the Internet Poker Act of 2010 and, as its name implies, the measure would solely bring legalized online poker to the United States. It also states that only existing land-based gambling companies will be able to offer poker to U.S. residents for the first two years.

The Journal noted that one of the primary proponents of the bill is Caesars Entertainment, which is based in Nevada: “has been a top priority for the Las Vegas-based Caesars Entertainment Corp., which recently changed its name from Harrah’s Entertainment Inc. and is the largest casino company in the world by revenue. The company owns the popular World Series of Poker brand that it hopes to parlay into online success to make up for anemic growth in its U.S. casino markets.” The Journal added that MGM was also in support of Reid’s bill.

Among those weighing in on poker-only bill was Poker Players Alliance(PPA) Executive Director John Pappas, who told PocketFives.com on Friday, “We have always stated that there was an opportunity to get a bill through during the lame duck session. I don’t think we should start dancing in the streets. There is a serious and deliberate process and we need to ensure that the interests of the poker community are properly addressed in any bill that moves. With that said, we remain hopeful that something can be accomplished in the coming days and weeks.”

Reid will retain his post as Senate Majority Leader when the new Congress convenes in January. However, on the other end of the Capitol, Republicans will gain control of the House of Representatives. In the House, current Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA, pictured) introduced HR 2267, which creates a full licensing and regulatory framework for the internet gambling industry in the United States. The bill passed out of Frank’s Committee in July, but has not yet seen the light of day in front of the full House.

Among those questioning the future of Reid’s efforts to legalize online poker was Interactive Media Entertainment and Gaming Association(iMEGA) Chairman Joe Brennan, who told PocketFives.com, “The reason why the UIGEA made it through in 2006 is because it had a zealous, dedicated core of legislators who wanted it, a lot of apathy by everyone else, and a lot of stealth. There is zero stealth here. If Reid’s bill is going to pass by tacking it onto something like the tax bill, it’s now so high-profile that everyone will see it coming.”

The UIGEA was attached in the final minutes of the 2006 Congressional session to an unrelated port security measure at the urging of then-Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-TN). Brennan gave his take on the proponents of anti-internet gambling legislation like the one that passed four years ago: “They truly believe that gambling is immoral. Jon Kyl (R-AZ, pictured) held up three Treasury nominations because he was upset about the delay of the UIGEA’s regulations. Kyl is obviously on the lookout for it and so are a lot of other people. It’s difficult to ‘Frist’ it when it’s very public.”

The bill also prohibits U.S.-based gambling companies from acquiring the assets of sites that currently serve the market like PokerStarsand Full Tilt. In essence, according to Brennan, the world’s largest online poker rooms may be shut out of the United States for the first two years of the bill’s enactment. However, Brennan explained, “At the end of the day, it’s still a steep hill for it to climb. Time is unfortunately running out.”

Visit the Poker Legislation forum for the latest headlines.

12 COMMENTS

    • While legalizing online poker would be great…it would interesting to see who would step up and provide a legitimate online poker site being based out of the U.S….anyone have any idea who that might be? Is the UB/Absolute sites based in the US? Indian companies? And do those count? As Deuce2High said, this isn’t gonna be pretty…

    • Plato, for example, holds that knowledge of what is just or moral, and the ability to distinguish true justice or morality from what is merely apparently just depends on the full development and use of human reason. ~ we don’t need you to be our god’s just stop holding freedoms and our economy hostage.

    • Sites like Pokerstars would probably just dip out for 2 years. They have plenty of worldwide action now.

    • this aint gonna be pretty

      I don’t think it’ll make things much worse than they are now…Where’s there’s money to be made someone will step up..I definitely see Caesars trying to capitalize and expand the WSOP franchise.

    • In other news, Pokerkaiser was caught snorting percosets off Felipe Montenegros sister, Maria’s, breasts while NestofSalt teabagged her.

      ooorlllyy?

    • for sure harrahs would start an online site an it would be instantly huge with the wsop being so famous – personally praying every night this happens, long way off though im sure

    • The way it reads the big casino companies and indian reservations will be the ones opening new sites. I pray this happens, because I would feel much better having my money here in the U.S. with regulation. I worry though the time is against us.

    • This story was also featured over on the Huffington Post. Considering HP is a site that caters to the left (and generally has smarter comments than, say, Yahoo) it has a lot of ignorance visible in the postings there as well. People are really afraid of silly things. I’d like to stay with FTP and PS, but if Harrah’s is my only alternative I’ll transfer my funds the day it becomes possible. I hope it makes a way through and doesn’t contain the sort of nasty tax measures as seen in PS-France.