1. there's much worse out there
    Edited By: dolphin13 Oct 7th, 2017 at 03:04 AM
    Add dolphin13 to Rail
  2.  
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    The lol fake shit isn’t fake. Welp


    If it's fake, then it shouldn't be so hard to discredit, right? Saying it has been discredited a bunch of times isn't discrediting anything.
    Add p00pymcp00perton to Rail
  3.  
    Originally Posted by p00pymcp00perton View Post

    If it's fake, then it shouldn't be so hard to discredit, right? Saying it has been discredited a bunch of times isn't discrediting anything.


     
    Originally Posted by norcaljeff View Post

    Tell us more about trump’s lawyer being somewhere he wasn’t and about hooker pee loooool we’ll wait

    ...
    Add norcaljeff to Rail
  4. it's the war on information. fake news. fake science. fake secretary of defense, etc.
    Add Hank H1LL to Rail
  5. Oh, you mean Trump's lawyer, the one under federal investigations right now? He's denying shit too? I'm shocked!
    Add p00pymcp00perton to Rail
  6.  
    Originally Posted by Hank H1LL View Post

    it's the war on information. fake news. fake science. fake secretary of defense, etc.


    Add Cooker to Rail
  7. There are defamation lawsuits that have been filed. Also, Mueller and the FBI have interviewed the dossier author recently. If it is bullshit, then the defamation lawsuits will be wins and team Mueller has nothing. Reuters is reporting intelligence officials have concluded that the Russians named in the dossier are in fact Russian intelligence officials. So the dossier is at least partially correct if they are to be believed.
    Add p00pymcp00perton to Rail
  8. They put real names into a discredited dossier? This is getting good.
    Add rebelfd to Rail
  9.  
    Originally Posted by p00pymcp00perton View Post

    Oh, you mean Trump's lawyer, the one under federal investigations right now? He's denying shit too? I'm shocked!

    Is he the guy that was proven to be here while the dossier claimed he was there? It was some other amercian with the same name. Don't know if that's who we are talking about.
    Add ginwilly to Rail
  10.  
    Originally Posted by Cooker View Post

    Add Hank H1LL to Rail
  11. Add dolphin13 to Rail
  12. Case solved
    Add rebelfd to Rail
  13.  
    Originally Posted by p00pymcp00perton View Post

    Oh, you mean Trump's lawyer, the one under federal investigations right now? He's denying shit too? I'm shocked!

    We can wait for details

     
    Originally Posted by p00pymcp00perton View Post

    There are defamation lawsuits that have been filed. Also, Mueller and the FBI have interviewed the dossier author recently. If it is bullshit, then the defamation lawsuits will be wins and team Mueller has nothing. Reuters is reporting intelligence officials have concluded that the Russians named in the dossier are in fact Russian intelligence officials. So the dossier is at least partially correct if they are to be believed.

    Lol defamation. Thought u were a Law dog, Law dog
     
    Originally Posted by ginwilly View Post

    Is he the guy that was proven to be here while the dossier claimed he was there? It was some other amercian with the same name. Don't know if that's who we are talking about.

    Yes iirc
    Add norcaljeff to Rail
  14. While I just continue to enjoy life you all are owning the shit out of this thread

    Nothing's changed

    Back in a week or 2

    Hope someone here enjoys autumn
    Edited By: Earlybird893 Oct 7th, 2017 at 03:59 AM
    Add Earlybird893 to Rail
  15. This was on a mural at the Dr. Seuss museum. It's from his first book. Authors refused to attend an event because they considered it racist. The museum has agreed to take down the mural.

    Edited By: dolphin13 Oct 7th, 2017 at 04:08 AM
    Add dolphin13 to Rail
  16. Lol jfc
    Add norcaljeff to Rail
  17. Add El Guapo to Rail
  18. ROR!!
    Add ginwilly to Rail
  19. LOOOOOOOOL at the dossier being discredited.

    Sure, that's why they are still talking to the author of it a year after it came out.

    You guys are doing great!
    Add Tread to Rail
  20.  
    Originally Posted by dolphin13 View Post

    This was on a mural at the Dr. Seuss museum. It's from his first book. Authors refused to attend an event because they considered it racist. The museum has agreed to take down the mural.

    What's racist about it?
    Add VinnyRoo2002 to Rail
  21.  
    Originally Posted by Tread View Post

    LOOOOOOOOL at the dossier being discredited.

    Sure, that's why they are still talking to the author of it a year after it came out.

    You guys are doing great!


    At least two facts have been lol’d. Real life? Tell us more about pee and whores lol
    Add norcaljeff to Rail
  22.  
    Originally Posted by VinnyRoo2002 View Post

    What's racist about it?

    It's disgusting. It plays on the stereotype that Asians love wearing cleats when they eat rice.
     
    Add qjuice14 to Rail
  23. Those aren't cleats, they're those gangster asian sandals with wooden blocks. Don K. posted a picture of his. Pretty sure he was eating rice too.
    Add Sage Lee to Rail
  24.  
    Originally Posted by p00pymcp00perton View Post

    I agree with him, in context. It's a nothing burger in terms of winning future elections, which is what he was talking about when that clip was taken. Dems can't spend political capital on a stupid investigation and expect to get elected. Sure, Benghazi/email nonsense worked like a charm in damaging Hillary but it won't work on a sitting president where his base will believe the sky is purple if he says its purple.

    It worked like a charm bc she got 13 ppl killed, refused to call in reenforcements and then committed, at a minimum, 22 felonies, and committed 7 counts of perjury. loooooooooool

    Worked like a charm. You act like it was political grandstanding.

    Muh Russia on the other hand.... 2 years, 2 genders, 2 scoops, 0 evidence. All the same in poopyland tho... ffs
     
    Add Aaron_Hacker to Rail
  25.  
    Originally Posted by Tread View Post

    LOOOOOOOOL at the dossier being discredited.

    Sure, that's why they are still talking to the author of it a year after it came out.

    You guys are doing great!

    Ok Waco it's the very definition confirmation bias in writing. Steele gave the democrats what they wanted the facts be damned. And LOL is on you. LOL.
    Add rebelfd to Rail
  26.  
    Originally Posted by rebelfd View Post

    Ok Waco it's the very definition confirmation bias in writing. Steele gave the democrats what they wanted the facts be damned. And LOL is on you. LOL.

    Great, then you should have no problem listing the "facts be damned" statements right now. Let's hear them.
    Add Tread to Rail
  27.  
    Originally Posted by Aaron_Hacker View Post

    It worked like a charm bc she got 13 ppl killed, refused to call in reenforcements and then committed, at a minimum, 22 felonies, and committed 7 counts of perjury. loooooooooool

    Worked like a charm. You act like it was political grandstanding.

    Wow, that's quite a list against Hillary. I'm amazed she isn't in prison. Maybe if Trump had campaigned on locking her up things would be different. Imagine if he campaigned on locking her up and didn't pursue any of the "obvious" crimes she committed. That would be political grandstanding. Good thing nothing like that ever happened.
     
    Originally Posted by Aaron_Hacker View Post

    Muh Russia on the other hand.... 2 years, 2 genders, 2 scoops, 0 evidence. All the same in poopyland tho... ffs

    2016 was 2 years ago? The evidence we do have is that Trump, Republicans, willywoo, etc all can give a shit about Russia hacking the US as long as Trump ended up the winner.

    Meanwhile all i've said in this thread is the dossier hasn't been discredited. Repeating that the dossier has been discredited 1000 times on Sean Hannity doesn't make it so.
    Edited By: p00pymcp00perton Oct 7th, 2017 at 08:14 PM
    Add p00pymcp00perton to Rail
  28. Already provided link.
    Add rebelfd to Rail
  29. That brings us to the second reason to focus on the dossier — the one I find most disturbing. The FBI and Justice Department are thwarting Congress’s efforts to get to the bottom of it. As the Washington Examiner’s Byron York has been reporting, the FBI, backed by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein (who appointed Mueller), has been ignoring an August 24 subpoena for information about the dossier issued by House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes (R., Calif.). Concurrently, DOJ and the Bureau are stonewalling Senate Judiciary Committee chairman Charles Grassley (R., Iowa), who has inquired about the dossier in a probe of suspected investigative irregularities. And then there is the Senate Intelligence Committee, which is conducting the main congressional collusion probe. On Wednesday, Chairman Richard Burr (R., N.C.) groused that the committee had “hit a wall” because Steele refuses to discuss the dossier with its investigators. In a nutshell, then, the Justice Department and FBI are citing the Mueller investigation as their rationale for ignoring congressional demands for information, and Steele won’t talk to the Senate while he is talking to Mueller and the FBI. In trying to wrap my brain around this, here’s what I don’t get: The Justice Department and the FBI now answer to President Trump, not to President Obama. The key players, Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein (in place of recused Attorney General Jeff Sessions) and new FBI director Christopher Wray, are Trump appointees. So . . . if the Trump Dossier really is a completely discredited piece of garbage, who on earth has a greater incentive than Trump to expose it? Why are the Trump Justice Department and FBI impeding congressional probes? If the information is false, you would think they couldn’t shovel it out fast enough. Why are the Trump Justice Department and FBI impeding congressional probes? But what if the information — or at least some of it — were true? Under those circumstances, the White House would make a political calculation: Trump would be better served by simply continuing to complain about a purported witch-hunt and politicized abuses of surveillance authority; there would be too much downside risk in directing the Justice Department and FBI to disclose all relevant information to Congress forthwith.

    Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...-investigation
    Add p00pymcp00perton to Rail
  30.  
    Originally Posted by rebelfd View Post

    Already provided link.


    LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL. A link that simply states the dossier is discredited and then gets statements from people under federal investigation making denials. Awesome proof.
    Add p00pymcp00perton to Rail