Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


0 Neutral

About FenwayKing

  • Community Level


Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. So someone told me about this and just wanted to say a couple things: 1) The only reason I didn't respond to Luke's diatribe vs. me isn't because I think I'm too good to respond to him or anything, but mainly because I don't want to get into a debate about my character on Twitter. It's completely unproductive and isn't going to prove anything either way. Have I said some arrogant things on Twitter? Sure no doubt (I will say that some of them were tongue-in-cheek because I know people think I'm very arrogant so was just playing off that). I like to think that most people who have met me though don't find me that way. If not, well I'm sorry for that but I don't think I'm this arrogant douche who blows everyone off all the time. I don't deny that some of Luke's criticism is warranted but not responding to him was mainly because I don't think arguing about on Twitter accomplishes anything. 2) I don't post here anymore or read the forums because I simply don't have the time to anymore. When I was hyper-posting on here I was in college and other than cramming for exams had a lot of free time where I could read and post etc. The time I had here was extremely fun, I learned a lot about things, made some great friends, and I do miss just being able to sit around for hours shooting the shit but I simply don't have the time having a "real job" or whatever now. The problem isn't that I'm too good for OT; OT just consumes too much time when I have a relatively shortened time frame to maximize my earning potential in poker. Even though everyone thinks I'm "hollywood from OT," whenever I'm in Vegas I'm still always down to say hi, meet up with people etc. I just can't really post on here without it being a major distraction to me. Anyway, thanks to the friends who did support me on here and I think most of the people who don't like me, they never did like me and that's alright with me.
  2. Is someone consolidating all these? Assume most websites will be taken down eventually
  3. the thing with ppl hating on foles is even if he's not necessarily the greatest or more talented than a bunch of other QBs is that he has a great offensive system and the best playcaller in the league. Systems matter. We can make a big hullabaloo about how the system is "making" him but is anyone really going to care if he's putting up a 30-10 every year (obv 27-2 was just insane but even if he regressed to that he'd have some of the best stats in the league.) QBs/systems/surrounding talent etc are so inextricably linked that it's pretty likely Foles continues to put up top 10 stats over the next few years imo
  4. FenwayKing

    The Leftovers

    yea because cults usually define themselves as such...
  5. don't you think the logical assumption would be that someone who follows the tourney scene more closely (me) would have a much clearer idea than someone who clearly doesn't (you)? Nope, seems to make more sense to say "LEVEL??" without even doing a cursory search on google to see if maybe there's a reason I was saying that. That's what I don't understand---you freely admit you don't really know but still assume there's no reason to say that. btw the year Ivey made it, other than him, no one else would rank in the top 100 tourney players.
  6. why would it be? Dan is one of the 5 best tournament players in the world by anyone's measure, Martin's probably top 15-25 and Craig's in the top 50-100. Considering the remaining field, the other 6 likely won't be fish so doesn't even seem like much of a stretch to say that Name another year where it would even be close?
  7. if craig, martin and dan all ft it might be the most talented wsop main ft ever
  8. To this I say: but I'm sure you've done a lot of math on BRM and risk of ruin and variance which leads to your conclusion that Waco is a scumbag...
  9. yo waco i owe you 1757 from the PLH so plus this 175 is 1932, just call it 1930? im playing 1c and can have it on me tmrw

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.