Jump to content

Fox

Members
  • Content Count

    2,710
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

Profile

Personal

  • About Yourself
    Chris 'Fox' Wallace has been a regular contributor to Pocketfives since it's inception in 2005. He is a professional poker player and coach, writes a monthly column for Bluff magazine and writes multiple articles every week on Poker Update.
  • Favorite poker hand
    6h6c6s6d in Omaha
  • Your profession
    Poker player and poker coach
  • Favorite place to play
    San Jose, CR
  • Your hobbies
    I play slide guitar and a little harmonica and I throw the Frisbee for my mutt.
  • Favorite Cash Game and Limit
    High-Limit Razz and Omaha 8
  • Favorite Tournament Game and Limit
    Razz MTT's

Live Results

Social

  • Twitter Follow Name:
    foxpokerfox

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Screen names

Rankings

  • Worldwide

    N/A

  • All-time high

    2,687 (2010)

Cashes

  • Lifetime total

    $54,590

  • Biggest cash

    $8,730

  • Number of cashes

    75

  • Average cash

    $728

  • gpi_ranking

    4,398

Latest post

  1. This article is provided by pokerfox.net. If you like what you read we have a lot more just like it inside! With the number of questions on the forums here at pocketfives about bankroll management, I thought some basic information about bankroll management was needed. This is an adaptation of an article from my website at www.pokerfox.net, and it is a good example of the kind of thing we do there. It has occurred to me recently that many people have questions about bankroll management that aren't easily answered with just a simple number or a formula, so this article should give you some ideas about how to think about your bankroll for yourself. Hopefully this information will allow you to come up with a safe and effective bankroll strategy and prevent you from going broke. I'll start with a few numbers for reference. These aren't exact numbers, but they are a good place to start, and for our purposes they will do just fine. Below there are three columns. The numbers in the "Pro" column are for players who derive the majority of their income playing, and would be devastated financially if they lost their bankroll to a bad run of cards. Using these figures will yield a less than 1% chance of going broke over the course of a lifetime of play assuming that you are a solid winning player. The numbers in the "Protected" column are for a bankroll that you are going to attempt to make a serious income from. If your bankroll will be tough to replace if you lose most of it then you should use these numbers as a starting point. The "Unprotected" column is for people who are willing to play a little looser in an attempt to build a bankroll, and for those of you who could easily replace your bankroll if you were to lose it. Keep in mind that using these figures does yield a significant possibility of going broke or having to drop down levels if you get off to a rough start. An average winning player (if there is such a thing) would have a less than 10% chance of going broke if they use the unprotected number and don't remove any money from their bankroll until it is built up to a safer level. If you use the unprotected column as a long term guide, and pull money out any time you get significantly above that number, you will almost certainly go broke at some point. Now that we have these numbers, I can teach you how to modify them and how to use them. The practical application of these numbers also requires a basic understanding of variance and what kinds of things affect it, so we'll discuss that first. Variance is a term used to describe the ups and downs you experience in a situation where results can differ in the short term, from their average. It's also a nice way to describe a losing session. Hatfield "How'd you do today Fox?" Fox "Lots of variance." Hatfield "How much are you stuck?" Fox "About $600" Lots of things can increase or decrease your variance. If you read my previous bankroll article on limit Hold Em then you have seen some of the factors in the formula I presented. I'll do my best to present them in order of importance. Your win rate is the single biggest factor in determining the variance that directly affects your bankroll. A solid 2BB/100 winner in a limit Hold Em game is not likely to see a downswing of more than 300 big bets very often, and (if he is lucky) may not see one in ten years. If that same player moves up to a tougher game where he is only winning half a big bet per 100 hands, a downswing of 300 BB's could occur every year or two. Hit the books and improve your game, and your variance will decrease as well. Your mental stability will also affect your variance a great deal. That 60 BB downturn will turn into a 200 BB losing streak if it affects your mental state, and a small losing session can turn into a serious beating if you let it put you on tilt instead of getting up from the game. Your playing style will affect your variance as well, though usually in small chunks rather than large ones. A very loose aggressive player who is winning at the same rate as a tight solid player will see more small ups and downs. Using limit Hold Em as an example, the loose aggressive player, no matter how good he is, will see more 50 BB swings than a tight solid player. If loose aggressive gets you a higher win rate then you shouldn't change your style, you simply need a little larger bankroll and the ability to deal with frequent swings. Your opponents playing style can also affect your variance. If your opponents are loose and aggressive, or simply loose and unbluffable, then your variance will rise slightly. This is somewhat offset by the fact that your overly loose opponents will be idiots, and your win rate will be higher in these games. In multi-table tournaments the payout structure and the size of the field will have a huge affect on your variance. The larger the tournament is the less often you will make the top three where the big money is. Lots of misses, and the rare big win, is a perfect recipe for high variance. The numbers in the chart above assume an average field size of 200. In the very large tournament fields, with buy-ins below $30 online your variance will be quite high, though your win rate against the donkeys who populate those tournaments will help offset the huge field size. In a very steep payout structure tournament like the OWNS tournament on UltimateBet the variance is so high that 500 entry fees might not be enough, even for a very good player. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the OWNS, it's a $50 rebuy tournament where the winner takes the whole prize pool, and it is often filled with excellent players. Scary. Keep in mind also that the number in the chart above is assuming regular freeze out tournaments. If the tournament is a rebuy you have to assume at least four times the initial buy-in as a your actual investment. If you play a lot of rebuy tournaments it would be wise to count the number of rebuys and the add-ons for a few tournaments and come up with a good idea what your average investment really is for each tournament. In a ring game the number of players has the opposite effect on variance. Playing shorthanded or heads up can increase your variance greatly because you are forced to play a looser and more aggressive style, and your opponents will usually play a little more reckless style as well. In ten handed games your long-term variance should be significantly lower. Heads up sit and go tournaments are a variance monster all to themselves. Your win rate will have a massive effect on your variance in heads up play, and a player who is only winning 55% of his matches will have huge swings, while a really solid heads up player with a 70% win rate can get away with using numbers about twice the size of the regular SNG numbers in the chart above. The 55% player probably can't have a big enough bankroll no matter what he does; the variance is just too high. That should give you a pretty good idea how high your variance is compared to most players and allow you to come up with a fairly accurate number that takes into account your personal variance, and the level of risk you are willing to take with your bankroll. Now let's take a look at a few ideas for ways to take calculated risks without worrying too much about your bankroll disappearing. A rolling bankroll is my own personal favorite. Pick a number that is when you will move up to the next level - we'll call it your ceiling - and a number at which you will have to move down a level because of a losing streak - we'll call that your floor. When you hit your ceiling you can move up a level, and when you hit your floor you must move down. Failing to move down immediately when you hit your floor is very risky; don't do it. As an example If you a 10/20 player and using 350 big bets ($7,000) as your floor then you might want to play until you have 450 big bets at the next level (15/30) before you move up in case you hit a losing streak right away at your new level. 450 big bets at 15/30 is $13,500 so that would be your ceiling at 10/20. Once you move up levels to 15/30 your new floor would be 350 x $30 or $10,500. Taking a shot at a big payday is nearly impossible to resist on occasion, especially for tournament players. If done judiciously, and in circumstances where your win rate is likely to be very high, this won't increase your variance too terribly. For ring game players I recommend that you never move up more than one level, and that you set yourself a specific number that you can lose at the higher level before you end your little adventure. This number should be less than 10% of your bankroll, and it is not a practice that you should engage in with any frequency. I will occasionally step up a level when I see one of my favorite fish at a table, but otherwise it's just too risky. Losing 5% of my bankroll ruins my day entirely and takes me a week to win back, making the risk worthwhile only if I can expect a much higher than average win rate at the higher table. For tournament players taking a shot can be playing a tournament with an overlay even if is twice your usual buy-in, or playing a few satellites to win your way in to a big tournament. The BoDog 100k guarantee is a good example of a place to take an occasional shot. The weak competition, combined with a large overlay, make this tournament very profitable even if it is a little above your usual comfort level. No matter what your reasons are for taking a shot at a larger tournament, the buy-in should never exceed 5% of your bankroll, and these excursions into deeper water should remain few and far between. Hopefully this article gives you all the tools you need to understand bankroll management. Feel free to email me at fox@pokerfox.net with any questions or suggestions you may have. I'll see you at the final table, Fox
×

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.